GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   I AGREE WITH LENSMAN I am GOING TO VOTE FOR BUSH (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=376978)

Peacemaker 10-25-2004 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by wvuatl

I have not read the Qu'ran but I have read many non-mainstream news sources:


enough said.. just stop talking about stuff you have no clue about.

i have several muslim friends here, and i asked them about "kill other people".. and they say, that it is not allowed to kill other people.. so, what you are talking here, is just BULLSHIT

nikcho 10-25-2004 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimmyf
education you say we would be all dead before we got'em educated...

Looks like you want the UN 2 take over..

get serious or better still get educated

We cannot "got'em" educated but how about educating the people here in the US? It is interesting that this country is losing its competitive edge in many aspects (porn excluded) :-) It was the manufacturing jobs leaving the country, soon it will be the tech ones already on their way to Asia. What will be left here is really the low-paying face-to-face jobs...

I do believe that UN should take over on international matters. Maybe it was a mistake to attack Iraq. Maybe these unaccountable and unelected judges at the International Criminal Court can really stop the madness of a person who I am not afraid to compare to a recent German Dictator behind the shadow of an enemy called "terrorism".

And give me a break, I may be old-fashioned that I still read books but chills go down my spine when I think about the "9/11 Commission Report" the best non-fiction this year. Yes, there is terrorism out there. Yes, the war on terror cannot be won. Yes, there will be more attacks against the US. And although I am positive that George Bush's intentions are good and patriotic, they have degenerated into shutting up opposition and fueling the world imbalance.

I would allow myself to quote Ted Rall:
"10. We deserve a president who can speak English and doesn't look like a chimpanzee. John Kerry (news - web sites) is a far from ideal prospect but he's a huge leap forward from an evolutionary standpoint."
For the full article, please visit:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...aseagainstbush

wvuatl 10-25-2004 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peacemaker
enough said.. just stop talking about stuff you have no clue about.

i have several muslim friends here, and i asked them about "kill other people".. and they say, that it is not allowed to kill other people.. so, what you are talking here, is just BULLSHIT

You are missing my point.

I never said the Qu'ran did or didn't say that.

I didn't fucking read it so I don't know.

I'm saying SOME PEOPLE THINK the Qu'ran says that.

You can not dispute that fact. I am observing other people.

The people that think Qu'ran has those messages are mostly members of radical Islamic groups.

Your friends probably aren't members of a radical Islamic group. They are members of a club that has a friend who can't read.

:321GFY

sperbonzo 10-25-2004 11:33 AM

John Kerry will say whatever the polls tell him that you want to hear. And you will all suck it up without doing any research on what the guy has actually done while a senator for 20 years.

suckers.......:2 cents:

Peacemaker 10-25-2004 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by wvuatl
You are missing my point.

I never said the Qu'ran did or didn't say that.

I didn't fucking read it so I don't know.

I'm saying SOME PEOPLE THINK the Qu'ran says that.

You can not dispute that fact. I am observing other people.

The people that think Qu'ran has those messages are mostly members of radical Islamic groups.

Your friends probably aren't members of a radical Islamic group. They are members of a club that has a friend who can't read.

:321GFY

sure.. and before you start to insult friends of me, shut up , will you? :)

jacked 10-25-2004 11:40 AM

http://www.teenpiccentral.com/gfy/images/bush04.jpg

wvuatl 10-25-2004 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peacemaker
sure.. and before you start to insult friends of me, shut up , will you? :)
deal :thumbsup

DavieVegas 10-25-2004 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by OWNED
THIS COUNTRY NEEDS A LEADER WHO DOESN'T GIVE A FUCK AND WILL BLAST THE TERRORISTS TO HELL!!

BUSH IN 2004!

i hope your ready to get drafted u fucking moron

mardigras 10-25-2004 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sperbonzo
John Kerry will say whatever the polls tell him that you want to hear. And you will all suck it up without doing any research on what the guy has actually done while a senator for 20 years.

suckers.......:2 cents:

Kerry is not Bush:glugglug

CET 10-25-2004 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peacemaker
bullshit .. and alot.

the quran says "you should not kill other peoples"...

dont blame the quran.

After that it goes on to say when, how and why you should kill other people. It espouses the holy virtue of beheading, which is why we are seeing lots of beheadings right now, rather then stabbings, throat slittings, shootings or other forms of execution.

CET 10-25-2004 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peacemaker
enough said.. just stop talking about stuff you have no clue about.

i have several muslim friends here, and i asked them about "kill other people".. and they say, that it is not allowed to kill other people.. so, what you are talking here, is just BULLSHIT

How about YOU read the Koran. Just open it up and start reading. The Koran is not a book of peace, much like the old testament of the Bible.

CET 10-25-2004 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DavieVegas
i hope your ready to get drafted u fucking moron
You bought Kerry's scare line; hook, line and singer. Sucker! Kerry is saying he wants to expand the military by 40,000 billets. Where do you think those 40,000 servicemen are supposed to come from?

CET 10-25-2004 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mardigras
Kerry is not Bush:glugglug
Bullshit! They're almost the same with only a few minor differences. Put the issues side by side and actually compare them. How few differences you'll find is actually scarey. After doing so myself, I became convinced that we truly live in an autocracy. We only have two tenable choices and they both say the same thing.

ytcracker 10-25-2004 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lensman
Keep me the fuck outta this
hAHAHHAHA

leedsfan 10-25-2004 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by OWNED
THIS COUNTRY NEEDS A LEADER WHO DOESN'T GIVE A FUCK AND WILL BLAST THE TERRORISTS TO HELL!!

BUSH IN 2004!

congratulations on your successful lobotomy.:1orglaugh

titmowse 10-25-2004 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sperbonzo
John Kerry will say whatever the polls tell him that you want to hear. And you will all suck it up without doing any research on what the guy has actually done while a senator for 20 years.

suckers.......:2 cents:

i did my research.

How John Kerry exposed the Contra-cocaine scandal

Follow the Money, How John Kerry busted the terrorists' favorite bank

With probes, making his mark

John Kerry, the man who uncovered Iran-Contra

Jim_Gunn 10-25-2004 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by OWNED
THIS COUNTRY NEEDS A LEADER WHO DOESN'T GIVE A FUCK AND WILL BLAST THE TERRORISTS TO HELL!!

BUSH IN 2004!

Bush has failed to catch Osama bin Laden and most of Al Qaida's leaders have escaped punishment. These reasons alone should mean that Bush should be defeated. The incompetence and corruption of his administration are a disgrace to this country.

titmowse 10-25-2004 02:22 PM

Bush also had a chance to stop Zarqawi in 2002 but the Bush administration killed the operation because it would have devalued their mission to wage war on hussein:

"But the raid on Mr. Zarqawi didn't take place. Months passed with no approval of the plan from the White House, until word came down just weeks before the March 19, 2003, start of the Iraq war that Mr. Bush had rejected any strike on the camp until after an official outbreak of hostilities with Iraq. Ultimately, the camp was hit just after the invasion of Iraq began."

link

TheGoldenChild 10-25-2004 02:24 PM

LICK BUSH

NO MORE WAR

vending_machine 10-25-2004 03:10 PM

Just remember, the so called war on terror will never be won.

wvuatl 10-25-2004 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jim_Gunn
Bush has failed to catch Osama bin Laden and most of Al Qaida's leaders have escaped punishment. These reasons alone should mean that Bush should be defeated. The incompetence and corruption of his administration are a disgrace to this country.
I think that was thr downfall of the CIA... most of those people will still be running the show even if / when Kerry wins..

Sure the Whitehouse staff makes some calls, but most of that weight is on the shoulders of the CIA.. it's their job.

Right now, they're fighting to integrate the CIA & FBI.. so both organizations are suffering...

Bottom line is the USA & European Union needs better intelligence.

Pornkings 10-25-2004 03:16 PM

go Kerry

pxxx 10-25-2004 03:25 PM

I dont think that is a good decision.

project_naughty 10-25-2004 04:42 PM

wvuatl: The interpretation of the Qu'ran is the root of their Jihad battle, yes.

Me: Wrong. It is illegal in Islam to interpret the Qu'ran. There is only one meaning and that is exactly what is written. When it says "slay the unbelievers" that is what it means. It cannot be interpreted as "go outside and hug the nearest Jew".

wvuatl: BUT the people of the Middle East learn at a very young age that the FOCUS of the battle is over Palestine.

Me: Wrong. That is secondary. The primary focus of learning is to take over the whole world and convert/ enslave/ kill the population.

wvuatl: Every "terrorist message" I've read either before, after, or regarding an attack has a mention of the war in Palestine. Tell me that statement is wrong.

Me: If the terrorists were simply to say "we carried out this bombing because you are infidels" then even the stupid Westerners would stop supporting them. Pretending that it is because of Israel is to provide legitimacy to their acts in the eyes of stupid Westerners.

wvuatl: Many feel that USA's support for Israel is driven by two things:

1) After Hitler the USA swore that we would never let the Jewish race get wiped out.
2) That Jesus wll come again once there is a stable Middle East.

Me: The actual reason is to support the only democracy in the region.

wvuatl: Both the Qu'ran and Bible speak of this war... the war that will end the World. Many Jihadists "think" they are fighting the final Jihad.

Me: The Qu'ran cribbed much of it's content from the Jewish and Christian scriptures. This is why some of it sounds like the shit in the Bible.

project_naughty 10-25-2004 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peacemaker
bullshit .. and alot.

the quran says "you should not kill other peoples"...

dont blame the quran.

Thicky.

The earlier peaceful verses in the Qu'ran were abrogated (you don't know what that word means, I bet) by the later violent verses when Muhammad gained power. The Qu'ran is the root of the problem. Another problem is dumbass Westerners like you who don't understand a single thing about world affairs.

project_naughty 10-25-2004 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peacemaker
enough said.. just stop talking about stuff you have no clue about.

i have several muslim friends here, and i asked them about "kill other people".. and they say, that it is not allowed to kill other people.. so, what you are talking here, is just BULLSHIT

They were:

1. Lying to you. It is permitted for a Muslim to lie to a Kafir (derogatory term Muslims use for an unbeliever, not unlike the word "hahahahahaha") as long as it furthers the Muslim cause.

2. They have never read their own "holy" book.

project_naughty 10-25-2004 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DavieVegas
i hope your ready to get drafted u fucking moron
Well seeing as John Kerry himself says on his website that he will institute the draft, then if JK wins then I suppose OWNED will indeed be drafted.

Oh yeah, it was also the Democrats who instigated the draft bill in the Senate, which was shot down 402-2.

Wolfy 10-25-2004 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by project_naughty
Well seeing as John Kerry himself says on his website that he will institute the draft, then if JK wins then I suppose OWNED will indeed be drafted.

Oh yeah, it was also the Democrats who instigated the draft bill in the Senate, which was shot down 402-2.

Just showing some support - and appreciation for someone who actually keeps up and doesn't listen to talking points and then try to use them in a political debate.

Bush has his faults, but you know what the guys stands for. Go Bush.

ChumpChange 10-25-2004 07:00 PM

:1orglaugh fucking idiot

Doctor Dre 10-25-2004 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jacked
http://www.teenpiccentral.com/gfy/images/bushcheney.jpg
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

straight up from faraneight 911

Doctor Dre 10-25-2004 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
I thought Lensman is voting for Kerry. :)
same here ... he even made a thread about it

DavieVegas 10-25-2004 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by project_naughty
Well seeing as John Kerry himself says on his website that he will institute the draft, then if JK wins then I suppose OWNED will indeed be drafted.

Oh yeah, it was also the Democrats who instigated the draft bill in the Senate, which was shot down 402-2.

What are u talking about? Kerry looked at america in the face and said he will never institute the draft. Highly doubtful

piker 10-25-2004 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mardigras
GW... took us from a large surplus to a record deficit in 4 years...
The first administration in 72 years to lose jobs...
Bungled the Iraq situation every step of the way...
Failed to follow through on their own passed educational program...
A hinderance to scientific advancement...
Wants to legislate morality...
Is disliked by most of the world including half of his own country...

And that's just for starters...


ok, the recession and 911 took us from a large surplus to a deficit.... (btw, a surplus is worse then a deficit.. in terms of economy... )

jobs are at a net loss but yet the unemployment rate is at the lowest in decades.. weird....

iraq is a war.. shit is going to happen.. could we have used more troops and sure.... could it be worse sure....

you want more of a deficit? only a democrat can bitch about a deficit and a decrease in spending at the same time...

hinderance to scientific community? im guessing you mean stem cell research... but yet you look at the fact and the stem cell research that is banned shows absolutely no sign of being better then the ones that are oked...

you are against morality?

most of our best presidents were disliked by the world... its funny but what happens to be good for america tends not to be as good for europe.... which do you want? and half the population dislikes kerry as well... go figure...

Dead13 10-25-2004 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by piker
ok, the recession and 911 took us from a large surplus to a deficit.... (btw, a surplus is worse then a deficit.. in terms of economy... )
You actually went to school? Holy shit you better go back!!!

SexMatcher 10-25-2004 09:38 PM

If this is the best our political gene pools can offer us we have a problem.

We will be voting for Kerry since we feel that Kerry cares more about health care and health insurance. My wife is in really poor health since she was pushed in front of a car by the bouncers at the Voodoo lounge last year at one of the Internext convention parties. My wife has currently been waiting over a year for Social Security disibility to approve her and the lawyers say it could be another 6 months or more. That's if we have any Social Security left after Bush. Also how fucked up did our economy get in the past 4 years.?

Bush took his eye off the ball with UBL and tried to make up for it this wild goose chase with weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that don't exist. Please let us use some of that 87 Billion dollars to help my wife. What's up with Korea that DOES have weapons of mass destruction and DOES have the ability to hit the U.S. with them, oh, that's right, Korea doesn't have oil...

Beside who is better to fight a war on terrorism, someone that has servered and been in a war or someone that tried everything he could to avoid being sent to war. This war in Iraq created more terrorists than before. No matter what you think of Bush and Kerry this is the truth.

Paul Markham 10-25-2004 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by OWNED
THIS COUNTRY NEEDS A LEADER WHO DOESN'T GIVE A FUCK AND WILL BLAST THE TERRORISTS TO HELL!!

BUSH IN 2004!

So where were the terrorist in Iraq?

Bush has created more terrorists than he killed.

Thurbs 10-25-2004 11:10 PM

this country isnt the end all .. we keep going around waving our dicks around someones gonna chop that hubris right off.

kmanrox 10-26-2004 12:27 AM

if you were to wear a BUSH/CHENEY shirt in any country but the USA, I *guarantee* someone will either say mean shit to you, or kick your ass....

and dont talk shit unless you've been off of the North American continent this past couple of years.

SuckOnThis 10-26-2004 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sperbonzo
John Kerry will say whatever the polls tell him that you want to hear. And you will all suck it up without doing any research on what the guy has actually done while a senator for 20 years.

suckers.......:2 cents:

Christ, do all you Bush backers get your news solely from campaign commercials?

SuckOnThis 10-26-2004 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by project_naughty
Well seeing as John Kerry himself says on his website that he will institute the draft, then if JK wins then I suppose OWNED will indeed be drafted.


Show us where on Kerry's site that he says this ya lyin asshole.

piker 10-26-2004 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dead13
You actually went to school? Holy shit you better go back!!!
Well think about a surplus in these terms.... The govt is hoarding money... Meaning they are collecting money from you but not spending it... Which means you have less money... Which means you spend less... Which means it can collect less next year....

The you here is general... The problem here is most people cant think of general terms. They just think the govt finances should be like their own ideal finacial situation... I hope you arent one of those and then being sarcastic about schooling.

I assume that was your attempt to be sarcastic... and take what seems like an obvious positon having money is better then having no money... On a personal level that is true for yourself...On a govt level it is not true? Does it need to save for retirement?

piker 10-26-2004 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SuckOnThis
Show us where on Kerry's site that he says this ya lyin asshole.
He does say he wants to increase toops by 40k not sure how he plans to do that.. but i dont think he proposes any type of draft.. he may of been trying to paint that bush's foreign policy promotes a draft.. you know to scare people... but thats the only context he would suggest a draft im sure...

wvuatl 10-26-2004 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DavieVegas
What are u talking about? Kerry looked at america in the face and said he will never institute the draft. Highly doubtful
at this point, you really can't trust anything either side says 100%

they'll really say anything to win

Halo18 10-26-2004 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by piker
jobs are at a net loss but yet the unemployment rate is at the lowest in decades.. weird....
Once you're collecting unemployment for a certain period of time, you're cut off from collecting and thus no longer counted in the "unemployment" stats...but you still don't have a job. That's how jobs are at a net loss. By the way, unemployment right now isn't that far off from when Clinton left office...

Quote:

you are against morality?
I don't think anyones against morality... I think he means it shouldn't be passed into law because everyone has morals that are different. Abortion is a prime example... half the country thinks it's morally wrong, the other half doesn't... it's better to give people the right instead of taking it away because half the population doesnt agree... because if you dont agree...it doesn't hurt you any, just dont have one. But if they outlaw it, half the country losses an option, a choice, and a freedom.

Quote:

most of our best presidents were disliked by the world... its funny but what happens to be good for america tends not to be as good for europe.... which do you want? and half the population dislikes kerry as well... go figure...
Bush was good for America? We already established we lost jobs... and have a record defecit... don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Kerry will DEFFINITELY fix anything. But change is needed.

Halo18 10-26-2004 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by piker
Well think about a surplus in these terms.... The govt is hoarding money... Meaning they are collecting money from you but not spending it...
Good point about the surplus... however I think it'd still be better to have some sort of a surplus (doesn't have to be a billion dollars) than be in debt.

wvuatl 10-26-2004 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by project_naughty
wvuatl: The interpretation of the Qu'ran is the root of their Jihad battle, yes.

Me: Wrong. It is illegal in Islam to interpret the Qu'ran. There is only one meaning and that is exactly what is written. When it says "slay the unbelievers" that is what it means. It cannot be interpreted as "go outside and hug the nearest Jew".

wvuatl: BUT the people of the Middle East learn at a very young age that the FOCUS of the battle is over Palestine.

Me: Wrong. That is secondary. The primary focus of learning is to take over the whole world and convert/ enslave/ kill the population.

wvuatl: Every "terrorist message" I've read either before, after, or regarding an attack has a mention of the war in Palestine. Tell me that statement is wrong.

Me: If the terrorists were simply to say "we carried out this bombing because you are infidels" then even the stupid Westerners would stop supporting them. Pretending that it is because of Israel is to provide legitimacy to their acts in the eyes of stupid Westerners.

wvuatl: Many feel that USA's support for Israel is driven by two things:

1) After Hitler the USA swore that we would never let the Jewish race get wiped out.
2) That Jesus wll come again once there is a stable Middle East.

Me: The actual reason is to support the only democracy in the region.

wvuatl: Both the Qu'ran and Bible speak of this war... the war that will end the World. Many Jihadists "think" they are fighting the final Jihad.

Me: The Qu'ran cribbed much of it's content from the Jewish and Christian scriptures. This is why some of it sounds like the shit in the Bible.

project_naughty, I think we're both right on most of the points...

You may be right on what the religous and political leaders are thinking.. and I may be right on what most of "the people" think.. I honestly think they are brainwashed into thinking Palestine is their focus.

Here are some interesting videos and writtings these topics:

http://www.memri.org/video/

MetaMan 10-26-2004 09:31 AM

75% of america wont vote this election, all you people need to SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Dead13 10-26-2004 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by piker
Well think about a surplus in these terms.... The govt is hoarding money... Meaning they are collecting money from you but not spending it... Which means you have less money... Which means you spend less... Which means it can collect less next year....

The you here is general... The problem here is most people cant think of general terms. They just think the govt finances should be like their own ideal finacial situation... I hope you arent one of those and then being sarcastic about schooling.

I assume that was your attempt to be sarcastic... and take what seems like an obvious positon having money is better then having no money... On a personal level that is true for yourself...On a govt level it is not true? Does it need to save for retirement?

Only in your Republican brain can you actually justify that.

Now here is your chance to get informed on the real story behind the surplus.

I was not being stockpiled simply for the sake of hording all of the money. More than 3 trillion dollars had been earmarked for the infamous Social Security Lock Box. This money, invested in strong interest bearing accounts and other various building practices, would have stabalized social secrity well past the baby boom retirement and their kids retirements with increases of up to 25% in social security benefits.

Now we have nothing, social benefits and veterans benefits are being cut by 37% and social security will be privatized under Bush. He can call it whatever the fuck he wants, his plan has us privitizing it and forces us to fend for ourselves if we ever intend to retire.

Now the rest of the trillons of dollars was earning interest and could have been used to do literally thousands of things. One of the things on the table was providing health coverage to every child in America under 18, that would still leave quite a bit left over if was handled correctly. Not to mention the surplus was still growing. And I hate to put your Bush tax cut to shame but saving parents thousands of dollars in health care for their children would have boosted the economy far better than making people believe they were getting a tax cut until the end of the year once they realized there was no tax cut and it was only a change in employeer withholding responsibilities. If you do not believe that is true, go read a copy of the 2003 and 2004 tax manuals, it is in big ass red print, your taxable liability has actually been raised while your employeer withholding has been lowered which means this January millions of Americans are going to owe money they cannot afford because they believed they were getting a tax break when in fact their taxes were raised.

If your against health care for children then you have proven your Republicanness.

I realize Republicans do not see money as a real thing since most of them have never had to earn their own, however having REAL money to spend is far better than spending borrowed money on credit. Had America been able to aquire a large enough surplus to actually spend in real time with no interest owed I cannot even begin to tell you how much more powerful this country could have become in the next 10 years.

Dead13 10-26-2004 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaMan
75% of america wont vote this election, all you people need to SHUT THE FUCK UP.
Funny, the percentage of Canadians who do not vote is still much lower than Americans who vote. :321GFY

project_naughty 10-26-2004 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SuckOnThis
Show us where on Kerry's site that he says this ya lyin asshole.
Ok fucko, here ya go:

http://web.archive.org/web/200402100...es/natservice/

That's what his website said about the draft earlier this year. He has now cleaned it up into a sanitized version. Isn't the Internet Wayback Machine a wonderful thing? :)

Quote:

As President, John Kerry will have the courage to lead and call on all Americans to make our nation stronger. Whether it is protecting America from the threats of terrorism or addressing the problems we have at home, America?s new challenges will not be met by the same old answers of big government or big tax cuts for the wealthy. John Kerry will call on all Americans - tapping into the idealism and ingenuity of Americans and putting it to work on building a safer, stronger, and more secure nation. Americans already make an enormous difference in their communities, volunteering, in Boys and Girls Clubs or homeless shelters. Many Americans do full time service. John Kerry believes that in these times, we need to bolster these efforts with a nationwide commitment to national service. Whether it is a Summer of Service for our teenagers, helping young people serve their country in return for college, or the Older Americans in Service program, John Kerry?s plan will call on every American of every age and every background to serve. John Kerry will set a goal of one million Americans a year in national service within the next decade.

John Kerry Outlines Plan to Require Service for High School Students

Part of 100 days Plan to Enlist One Million Americans in National Service A Year

On September 11th, 2001, America experienced the most terrible and deadly attack in its history. John Kerry believes we need to think big and do better and get more young Americans serving the nation.

As part of his 100 day plan to change America, John Kerry will propose a comprehensive service plan that includes requiring mandatory service for high school students and four years of college tuition in exchange for two years of national service.
This is what his website says now:
http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/national_service/

Quote:

Engage 200,000 Americans A Year In "Service For College"
John Kerry and John Edwards will offer a simple deal to hundreds of thousands of America's young people: if you will serve for two years in one of America's toughest and most important jobs, we will cover four years of tuition at a typical public university.
Hmmmm I wonder why he changed his website. Maybe he thought that it would harm his campaign to be honest about his plans........


As an Englishman, I cannot vote in your elections, but your decision affects me too.

Both Bush and Kerry are wankers. They are terrible candidates but there is no alternative.

There are thousands of terrorists whose job it is to attack America. If there is another 911 (which is more likely under Kerry because he is not as tough as Bush) then no one will have any money to buy porn, so you're out of a job anyway.

So why not bite your lip and vote Bush for another 4 years until a decent candidate can stand up who can take America forward.

If you want to keep your "cred" amongst your buddies then just tell them you voted Kerry, but don't fuck your country (and the rest of the world) by actually voting for Kerry.
America's enemies want Kerry to win because they know he will not fight them with the same vigour as Bush. That should be something of an eye-opener for you.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123