Would you let a porn tranny stick her penis in you without a condom on? I wouldn't. I don't think I'd even let one sit on my car seats without a condom on.
Originally posted by Holly Would you let a porn tranny stick her penis in you without a condom on? I wouldn't. I don't think I'd even let one sit on my car seats without a condom on.
Why!? because fuck em...thats why. Seriously though...trannies are not known for their strict moral fiber and virginal qualities. I would think condoms are a good idea.
Originally posted by mdcq Why!? because fuck em...thats why. Seriously though...trannies are not known for their strict moral fiber and virginal qualities. I would think condoms are a good idea.
If we want to assert that our industry does not harm society, a responsible attitude is mandatory.
Consentual kinky and explicit sexual depictions are OK!
Unprotected sex is NOT ok.
This is not a difficult concept to grasp (or rationally challenge) and it is not limited to any particular gender identity/orientation.
It may be a visual bummer (no pun intended) that the 'good old days' of unwrapped antics are over but, just as the adult industry has benefited by pop culture letting us into the living room and making adult entertainment mainstream (much to the chugrin of the right), the same evolvement of contemporary culture will yield an audience which, not only does not mind viewing depictions of smart sexuality, but will expect it as a measure of integrity.
Originally posted by mdcq Why!? because fuck em...thats why. Seriously though...trannies are not known for their strict moral fiber and virginal qualities. I would think condoms are a good idea.
yeah because straight men without developed breasts have always been known for their moral fiber.
Originally posted by dcortez If we want to assert that our industry does not harm society, a responsible attitude is mandatory.
Consentual kinky and explicit sexual depictions are OK!
Unprotected sex is NOT ok.
This is not a difficult concept to grasp (or rationally challenge) and it is not limited to any particular gender identity/orientation.
It may be a visual bummer (no pun intended) that the 'good old days' of unwrapped antics are over but, just as the adult industry has benefited by pop culture letting us into the living room and making adult entertainment mainstream (much to the chugrin of the right), the same evolvement of contemporary culture will yield an audience which, not only does not mind viewing depictions of smart sexuality, but will expect it as a measure of integrity.
-Dino
That's such horse shit. You think porn has the responsibility to advocate protected sex?
Why not ban violence in games and movies while you're at it. It's harmful to the society
I refuse to provide sex education through porn. Don't fuck with peoples freedoms, ok?
Originally posted by M_M That's such horse shit. You think porn has the responsibility to advocate protected sex?
Why not ban violence in games and movies while you're at it. It's harmful to the society
I refuse to provide sex education through porn. Don't fuck with peoples freedoms, ok?
No, I don't think it's our responsibility to advocate sex.
But, I do believe it's our opportunity to cut our industry some slack from the fundamentalists without compromising our freedoms by doing what makes sense anyways.
More important, from a plain business model, the members which will sustain your revenues (not flash in the pan thrill seekers who are already bored with even the most extreme content) will pay attention to what you choose to do - this is called catering to and respecting your market.
There are already a lot of themes which don't require rules or laws to stay away from them. This is just one of those things that's not a sacrifice.
Arguing for 'bareback' is no different than supporting taking up smoking with all we know now.
Obviously, there will always be those who are stuck through either habit or mindset to see beyond that.
Originally posted by dcortez No, I don't think it's our responsibility to advocate sex.
But, I do believe it's our opportunity to cut our industry some slack from the fundamentalists without compromising our freedoms by doing what makes sense anyways.
More important, from a plain business model, the members which will sustain your revenues (not flash in the pan thrill seekers who are already bored with even the most extreme content) will pay attention to what you choose to do - this is called catering to and respecting your market.
There are already a lot of themes which don't require rules or laws to stay away from them. This is just one of those things that's not a sacrifice.
Arguing for 'bareback' is no different than supporting taking up smoking with all we know now.
Obviously, there will always be those who are stuck through either habit or mindset to see beyond that.
I have no idea what your argument is.
I don't have a problem with content with condoms. I have a problem with people suggesting condomless porn not to be allowed.
Whatever sells, will be produced, as long as it is legal. That leaves us only one way to stop unprotected sex in porn: Banning it. Which fucks with our freedom, and that's why I am against that and against people suggesting it.
Arguing about if sex in porn "should" or "should not" be with condoms is just "blah blah blah" as long as rules and regulations don't change.
Originally posted by Holly Would you let a porn tranny stick her penis in you without a condom on? I wouldn't. I don't think I'd even let one sit on my car seats without a condom on.
definately one of the funniest things i've heard all day
Comment