GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   New York Times : Kerry for President (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=373207)

smack 10-17-2004 01:48 AM
fiddy


VOTE KERRY!!!!!!!!!!

momo 10-17-2004 01:54 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by CDSmith
Like I said, I didn't see an author's name anywhere, no one seemed to sign off on it at all other than the fact that it reads like an opinion and is in the opinions section.

I have no problem with Kerry per se, or the NYTimes for that matter. I have no ulterior motive for being on this thread other than the article looks to me like an opinion piece rather than an official declaration from the paper itself. That's all. I could be wrong, and if I am, big deal.

At least I got momo to relax.
"The opinions expressed in the editorials do not represent any one person's point of view, which is why they aren't signed. Through an editorial, the newspaper takes a leadership role in the community, not the person writing it."

http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjourna...9942045.htm?1c

NiteRain 10-17-2004 02:06 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by CDSmith
Like I said, I didn't see an author's name anywhere, no one seemed to sign off on it at all other than the fact that it reads like an opinion and is in the opinions section.

I have no problem with Kerry per se, or the NYTimes for that matter. I have no ulterior motive for being on this thread other than the article looks to me like an opinion piece rather than an official declaration from the paper itself. That's all. I could be wrong, and if I am, big deal.

At least I got momo to relax.
LOL, I understand CDSmith. Hope I didn't seem like I was attacking yah.

News papers try extremely hard to seperate the opinions of outside sources from their own, and it would have been noted in the article before they got into the letter, and at the end, to remind people that the statements made in this article is not and should not be accepted as the position of NYTimes, and as far as the reason why they didn't sign off on it, only NYTimes knows.

See yah you guys later going to hit the sack.

uno 10-17-2004 02:32 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by CDSmith
Where have I head that before?
It's probably that pervasive echo of common sense.

uno 10-17-2004 02:33 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by bringer
thats what i thought, but was mislead by momo, who also said they were hiding WMD in their news room.
The Iraqi nucular team and baghdad bob have been working on this piece for weeks.

uno 10-17-2004 02:34 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by momo
of course its an opinion piece but its still an official endorsement... its usually how a newspaper endorses a candidate, via the editorial.

http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml...toryID=6520169
so?

momo 10-17-2004 03:36 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by uno
so?
?

Libertine 10-17-2004 04:55 AM
Here is something a few of you seem to need. I didn't read the entire thread because it was wasting my time, so I offer my sincerest apologies if this has already been posted.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=editorial

uno 10-17-2004 04:57 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by momo
?
??

momo 10-17-2004 05:13 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by uno
??
i don't understand what your "so?" was for

momo 10-17-2004 05:14 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by punkworld
Here is something a few of you seem to need. I didn't read the entire thread because it was wasting my time, so I offer my sincerest apologies if this has already been posted.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=editorial
:thumbsup

uno 10-17-2004 05:35 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by momo
i don't understand what your "so?" was for
I thought it was pretty self explanatory.

So what?

Does that elaborate my point better? I'll say it again: They printed an opinion in their opinion section. Does them endorsing a candidate via the editorial pages change their news reporting? What exactly are you getting at?

Tuna 10-17-2004 05:35 AM
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLIT....endorsements/

momo 10-17-2004 05:41 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by uno
I thought it was pretty self explanatory.

So what?

Does that elaborate my point better? I'll say it again: They printed an opinion in their opinion section. Does them endorsing a candidate via the editorial pages change their news reporting? What exactly are you getting at?
it doesn't change their reporting. its an endorsement, thats the only thing i was getting at.

momo 10-17-2004 05:42 AM
http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wi...-regional-wire

http://www.news24.com/News24/World/U...606395,00.html

http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news...p_world _news

http://wireservice.wired.com/wired/s...n_wi re_story

:glugglug

uno 10-17-2004 06:20 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by momo
it doesn't change their reporting. its an endorsement, thats the only thing i was getting at.
Oh, I thought you had some sort of point about their reporting. Sorry.

webcrawler 10-17-2004 06:07 PM
Although NY times endorses kerry openly, there is no assurance that he will get the full support of everyone there. this is merely an opinion of one person and does not represent the majority.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:24 PM.
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123