Those pics look like camera-phone quality pics. The camera you posted should be able to take much higher quality photos.

you got a shitty camera

Read the following book

http://www.digital-camera-buying-gui...raphy-book.jpg

or get a new camera..

No offense, but *ALL* your pictures suck ass.. (Quality speaking)

grainy

the ones who say they are great, Im sure the camera can make a lot better pics...

very low quality.... imho

really phone cam :)

you are right . . . I could set it for "best" at 3.2 MP and get pics that are 2080x1368, or I can set it for "good"at 0.8 MP and get pics at 1024x768

Now, which do you think I am going to use for posting pics on a message board that are going to have to be resized anyway?

http://209.126.180.115/100_0031.jpg

yeah . . . they are just a bunch of big, fat liars :1orglaugh

She doesn't look too happy about you taking that pic. :Graucho

you noticed that too?

2 MP, not the best quality choosed.

http://www.nextdoorcash.com/test2.jpg

But its still a great pic:)
Little does she know 100's of adult folks have now seen her icey stare:):1orglaugh

HELLLLLLLLLLLLLO? IDIOT? ANYONE HERE?
there is a difference between resolution and picture quality...can u get it?

:bowdown :bowdown :bowdown


feel better?









:moon

no :) I just try to help :)

baddog, stop using the software zoom, that's what fucks you pics up.

She is just pissed because she has to stand at that fucking store all day most every day of the week.

<----Looks in bag of troll snacks....oops....all empty...come back tomorrow.

Living up to the name is a good thing, but your trying to hard pal.

you may have noticed in your travels that it is easier to get a building to stand still for a picture than it is people walking down the street

Like I said, I had those pics set for 0.8 MP not 3.2

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

you have a great subject....looks like interesting

I have found most Kodac lenses to be not very good :2 cents: