This is great, camchicks is giving this guy a recent history lesson and he's responding with half a Rush Limbaugh rant and nothing to back up his assumptions and bs. Don't waste your time with that kid.

Please tell me that newsmax article answered any doubts you may have had about the answer to that question. This is well known stuff.

Do you guys just forget what happend 3-4 years ago or were you not paying attention then?

Bush actually made the situation horribly worse when he said that NK was part an "axis of Evil".

He invaded Iraq and is doing nothing with NK, only 6-way bullshit talks, no sanctions, nothing.

Bush is talking about mixed messages. I mean, NK has nuclear weapons and Iraq did not. Now countries know what to do to avoid being invaded.

So Bush should STFU. He failed doing something about the crisis. NK has reprocessed the fuel rods and they are building even more weapons as we speak.

Once a country has nukes, its hard to bully them. That strengthens the argument to get rid of Saddaam before he got them, so we wouldn't have a situation like NK.

The 1994 plan was basically just an appeasement, and NK broke it. I don't know if its a problem that has a solution now.

:1orglaugh

You forget Saudi Arabia and Israel

In that case Bush should have focussed on North Corea and Iran instead of Saddam who wasn't even trying anymore to acquire nuclear weapons

Kerry wants bilateral talks AND multinational talks.

No wonder Bush doesn't want to talk to other leaders.
Bush is so incompetent that he gets owned in every debate :)

50 John Kerry supporters...

CamChicks couldn't give me a history lesson if his life depended on it. As I said, I don't engage in "google-offs" with people. Given enough time, I could find internet articles to prove everything from the existence of Bigfoot to the location of the lost city of Atlantis. Does that mean those things exist? No. Does it mean some idiots believe they do? Yes. Personally, I don't have the time. I read the thread, I respond out of my own knowledge of the subject based on the facts and history that I know to be true and based on opinions that I have formed by drawing conclusions from multiple sources. Not just what I happened to find when googling through the news that day on a quest to find yet another thing that proves how stupid Bush is.

You extremist idiots are ridiculous. You can tell the education level of most of you by the amount of times someone has compared Bush to Hitler in this thread. See, here on GFY it's easy to act cool because the uninformed and grammatically challenged peanut gallery will chime in in your defense. In the real world of intellectual discussion though, you are mental midgets. As is anyone who consistently takes the same extremist view every time. Things aren't that black and white. What you basically do is render your opinion irrelevant. It becomes sort of like white noise that no one pays attention to. Who cares what you, directfiesta, Cam Chicks or your ilk really have to say on a subject? We already know it will be all one-sided, biased, and based on a hatred for Bush. It just makes you look totally silly and like a nut (anywhere but on GFY). The things I've posted in this thread are true whether you want to believe them or not. I might actually listen to your side of the story if it wasn't so biased and unjust all the time. No one with any sense goes to Michael Moore and expects a fair view of things. The same can be said of Rush Limbaugh. As I said: white noise. I have things I agree and disagree with from Bush and Kerry. I just happen to disagree with Kerry more. But I listen to and understand both sides.

I'd put you on ignore, but it's too damn funny reading your BS that you think makes you looks so politically informed. I would like to see Cam Chicks in a debate though: "your response to the question?" "uh...hey guys, wait a sec, I gotta go google some articles for you! I didn't know we wouldn't have internet access at the podium. duuuuuuh".:1orglaugh

Btw, thanks for the "kid" reference, I'm always telling my wife I feel old ever since I turned 30.:thumbsup At least I'm not a "looser" anymore.

I'm going to ignore trouserrat's silly implication that posting facts somehow diminished the arguement. or the person making the arguement.

Hey, look what else I just google'd....

Bush's diplomatic skills amount to doing nothing but name-calling. That may be applauded by his xenophobic redneck base, but it puts the world in unneccessary danger. This isn't how you make friends.

Of course you'll ignore it, it makes it much easier to continue with your BS. Of course I always find it funny that things are "facts" when they agree with your argument but falsehoods when they don't. Keep googling, moron. If left to your own devices and knowledge, you'd appear the fool. You're going to be so sad come November, aren't you?

(PS. argument is spelled argument not "arguement". You spelled it that way twice so I assume it's not a typo. And before you say that's a lame observation, consider this: Spelling=how well read you are. Reading=information. Information=Knowledge. Maybe you should read more and cut and paste less.)

CamChicks, for once, could you please try to use your brain to compose an intelligent rebuttal, rather than simply copying and pasting facts that are easily found through any simple web search.

lol

"Make up shit based on half truths you heard on talk radio, don't post facts from news articles."

Good point guys.

We present valid points regarding this situation and the truth about the bilateral talks, and this jackass comes back with insults about us and reasons why we're not credible, the main reason being that we're posting facts. Does it get any better than this? :1orglaugh

Oh, and don't forget the spelling corrections.

I think the Bush monkeys are upset because their upper-chimp got owned big time by Kerry.
Muhahahahahahahaha!

So owned, he's going to win the election. Good one.

Rich, I don't think I've seen you post a valid point on this board ever. As with most people like you, valid points are only "valid" if they agree with your rhetoric. Take for instance this new thread:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...adid=366194&s=
They literally have video of Kerry taking a cheat sheet from his pocket, yet there's some reason for it or no that's not what you're seeing...it's a pen! C'mon. But Bush is Hitler. Yea that's reasonable. It's just so absurd.

Anyway, the bottom line is I enjoy debating politics with plenty of people on message boards with discussions ranging from music to video games to Walt Disney World. I talk with friends and family ranging from my homosexual raving liberal brother to my mom who literally has a talking George Bush doll. The reason I can discuss things with any of them is because they are 1) intelligent and 2) able to see multiple sides of an argument. As I have said before, this is something you and many others here are unable to do. Thus, you are pretty pathetic and your opinions only have even the tiniest shred of relevancy when you are espousing them to others as deluded as you. Walk outside and speak to actual knowledgable intellectuals and you'll be laughed at. I think you know this is the case and that's why you spend so much time BSing on here.

Btw, notice that Cam Chicks has not responded again to this thread because he was told to actually use his brain, not Google. Anyhow, better things to do tonight than debate with people who don't actually debate, only blather and bluster. Ta Ta.