Lens.. Has Groove Actually Been Banned??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Webby
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Oct 2002
    • 14956

    #1

    Lens.. Has Groove Actually Been Banned??

    Lens... I got this rumour that Groove has actually been banned from GFY cos of some crap over that troll and pervert SexEducation?


    If this is actually correct... You are talking about a total troll who has nada judgement of anything and who has published child porn, ripped off images from others, posts child porn links on GFY - yet you ban Groove???

    Duh?
    XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
  • polish_aristocrat
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Jul 2002
    • 40377

    #2
    He started a thread and forgot to add a comma.

    Thread title "Lensman a pedophile is using" indicated that Lens is pedo.

    Should be "Lensma, a pedophile is using...."
    I don't use ICQ anymore.

    Comment

    • Webmaster_Logic
      Confirmed User
      • Jul 2004
      • 1886

      #3
      Wow thats really messed up if it's true....

      Comment

      • Tipsy
        Confirmed User
        • Jul 2001
        • 6989

        #4
        However mistaken or not Groove may have been for posting it, you have to love it when sexped has started to piss people off so much that useful members start to get banned because of him.

        Talking of which it's been quiet lately. I suppose it's too much to hope....
        Ignorance is never bliss.

        Comment

        • Webby
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Oct 2002
          • 14956

          #5
          polish_aristocrat:

          Thread title "Lensman a pedophile is using" indicated that Lens is pedo.

          Should be "Lensma, a pedophile is using...."

          Are you seriously suggesting Lens banned Groove because of a comma??

          Everyone knows what is mean't - I'd hate to be picked up on every typo I make on this board :-)

          And yes! Groove has actually been banned over the splitting of hairs as to whether SexEd is a pedophile or a paedofile.

          It is clear, even on an initial review of SexEd's sites (even the remains of them left in archives) and the volumes of "indicators" on GFY, that there is some "problem".

          There is *no doubt whatsover* that SexEd was enticing kids into his sites. I don't need to see more of his "content" of some pervert sticking his dick into a child's mouth to make a rational decison as to whether there is an aura of CP around.

          One woman who is used to tracking pedos, when first reading that sex-education.com "front" said, - "This person is hiding his tendencies with hypocracy, - I know what I'm going to find inside the site" That was before there were any images displayed.

          Next we'll be hearing SexEd has a new career in childcare...

          It's ironic *real* members of this board, like Groove, get banned because of this trolling trash, while SexED remains an avid poster, pissing off what appears to be the majority of the board.
          XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

          Comment

          • Manowar
            jellyfish  
            • Dec 2003
            • 71528

            #6
            Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
            He started a thread and forgot to add a comma.

            Thread title "Lensman a pedophile is using" indicated that Lens is pedo.

            Should be "Lensma, a pedophile is using...."

            Comment

            • GonZo
              Confirmed User
              • Jul 2002
              • 3180

              #7
              Come get some....

              http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...94#post5442794
              Assclown Bob Rice wants to BANG your credit card!
              "I am putting the bastards of this world on notice; greed and corruption will always be met with "a voice made of ink and rage."
              All the information above is my personal opinion.

              Comment

              Working...