Posted by Lensman as regards sexeducation - GoFuckYourself.com

theking · 09-27-2004, 11:21 PM

Quote:

I haven't seen any child porn on any his stuff. I didn't see any in smokey's email.

And no one else has been able to forward me any proof on this guy.

And Groove basically called me a pedo in the thread title, so I guess it backfired on him.

With everyone talking about proof of this and proof of that...apparently not a single one that claims to have proof...can provide proof to the owner of this board.

What does that say about all of you that claim to have proof? I know what your claims of proof say to me.

Pig shit.

klik · 09-27-2004, 11:24 PM

i wish my ignore list could ignore the threads about him..

sarettah · 09-27-2004, 11:26 PM

Jace · 09-27-2004, 11:26 PM

i have no idea about the pedo thing, i just know he is annoying...prolly way more than lawrenceC ever got....

and definately not an adult webmaster, which I thought lensman was also cracking down on

there seems to be no consistency with this board...one day he bans for someone not being a webmaster, then one day you don';t have to be a webmaster

smack · 09-27-2004, 11:27 PM

sig placement.

sicone · 09-27-2004, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sarettah

Thats the closest thing to proof that I have seen since the day I joined the board here

WickedVenus · 09-27-2004, 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sarettah

wow thats major proof right there!!!

Jace · 09-27-2004, 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WickedVenus
wow thats major proof right there!!!

hahahahaha...oh shit...that is a great graphic

baddog · 09-27-2004, 11:44 PM

URL is 404 so really you are assuming things by the URL

irishfury · 09-27-2004, 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WickedVenus
wow thats major proof right there!!!

Wow I busted gut to that one

sarettah · 09-27-2004, 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog
URL is 404 so really you are assuming things by the URL

at best it is a piss poor choice of terms to be using in a website directory structure. It definitely appers that he was using tactics that most of us know are designed to attract one particular audience to the site. Much like these:

foolio · 09-27-2004, 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sarettah

Ok, so lets say I made a url like this

whateveryouwant.com/sarettah_fucking_dog_in_ass_and_licking_horse_dick/cumshot-1.jpg

that would mean you did all that right?

SmokeyTheBear · 09-27-2004, 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog
URL is 404 so really you are assuming things by the URL

The child porn was pulled picture by picture from the archie servers as it was reported..

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

If this censored graphic of a Russian advertisement is considered child pornography then I request the deletion of my Adult.com accounts and the termination of Archive.org as there is NO EXCUSE for posting child pornography.

BOTH MUST OCCUR THOUGH ...

Both Archives.org and SexEducation.com must be terminated.

However, if you feel that in some situations that CP must be discussed ... if you believe in free speech ...

Then you must answer the question - where?

I believe on the world's busiest adult webmaster board .. that under certain situations - Adult.com MUST allow the discussion of this most controversial subject ...

otherwise ... we can not teach those entering the biz about it ...

On my website - I would NOT attempt that type of discussion.
On SexEducation.com ALL GRAPHICS WILL BE 2257 compliant ...

Here though ...

I have questions about that?

Not the big mouths ...
but does the Adult.com community agree with that?

= = = = =
here is the final post ...
I wasn't done writing the "article" before the 5 min time limit was up ...

sarettah · 09-27-2004, 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by foolio
Ok, so lets say I made a url like this

whateveryouwant.com/sarettah_fucking_dog_in_ass_and_licking_horse_dick/cumshot-1.jpg

that would mean you did all that right?

Not at all. But it would indicate, imo, that you were at the least trying to get picked up by the SEs for those terms in some manner. Or it could be an accurate description of the folder content for all I know. I don't remember the 70's very well

SmokeyTheBear · 09-27-2004, 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by foolio
Ok, so lets say I made a url like this

whateveryouwant.com/sarettah_fucking_dog_in_ass_and_licking_horse_dick/cumshot-1.jpg

that would mean you did all that right?

Well you can take the word of the hundreds of people who have actually seen the pictures on his servers or you can assume you know what the pictures had on it..

I can tell you because i have seen them.. All you can tell me is you haven't . Just like you haven't seen jackson molest any little boys or o.j. simpson murder anybody

foolio · 09-27-2004, 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sarettah
Or it could be an accurate description of the folder content for all I know. I don't remember the 70's very well

lol

foolio · 09-27-2004, 11:58 PM

lol - forgot to post my point.... All these guys running around saying they have proof. IF they were telling the truth why would they not foward it to Lens? If they did they would get thier #1 wish and have this guy banned.... so whats holding them back? I think also these peopel are full of shit unless one of them stepsup and provides hard core proof to Lens.

if he did it - show it and lets get him out. If they dont have proof they shoud STUFU.

All I know is this shit is old now.

sarettah · 09-27-2004, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
Well you can take the word of the hundreds of people who have actually seen the pictures on his servers or you can assume you know what the pictures had on it..

I can tell you because i have seen them.. All you can tell me is you haven't . Just like you haven't seen jackson molest any little boys or o.j. simpson murder anybody

You've seen pictures like that of me ?? Oh shit. Damn, last times e something like this happened it cost me plenty. Ok, where are the pics? I want all the copies too.

On a serious note. I have never accused sexed of being pedo. I think he is way way out there and has used questionable practices in the past.

SmokeyTheBear · 09-28-2004, 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by foolio
lol - forgot to post my point.... All these guys running around saying they have proof. IF they were telling the truth why would they not foward it to Lens? If they did they would get thier #1 wish and have this guy banned.... so whats holding them back? I think also these peopel are full of shit unless one of them stepsup and provides hard core proof to Lens.

if he did it - show it and lets get him out. If they dont have proof they shoud STUFU.

All I know is this shit is old now.

I emailed lensman several pictures that have since been erased, but if the above quote is correct lensman saw the nude pictures of 14 year old girls and said it was ok..

Some of the other pictures previously contained hardcore pictures of apparent children engaged in sex acts..

SmokeyTheBear · 09-28-2004, 12:03 AM

Most of the hardcore images have been erased from the archive after repeated complaints regarding them. But the pictures posted in this thread * quote * and the other were from a well documented childrens porn ring in russia..

foolio · 09-28-2004, 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
I emailed lensman several pictures that have since been erased, but if the above quote is correct lensman saw the nude pictures of 14 year old girls and said it was ok.

but if the quote above is a correct quote I am taking that as Lens not seeing anything. "I haven't seen any child porn on any his stuff. I didn't see any in smokey's email."

So did lens see 14-year old girls nude? Or did he not see them?

You say you seen the pictures - did he say they were 14 or did they just look 14? Shit, I can show you some Asian girls that look 12 that are really like 30, lol. Hell, even little april and twanee (back in the day) tried to pull that shit. Could this have been sometihng like that? I have no idea - never saw pictures don't care to see the pictures. And in no way am I defending CP or SexEd but this ENTIRE thing is just fucking old.

BradM · 09-28-2004, 12:15 AM

I sent lens the thread that was obviously deleted that "masterblogger" posted a CP link on.

He said it wasn't proof enough.

Pageviews over morals.

PenisFace · 09-28-2004, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BradM
I sent lens the thread that was obviously deleted that "masterblogger" posted a CP link on.

He said it wasn't proof enough.

Pageviews over morals.

That about sums it up.

baddog · 09-28-2004, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
The child porn was pulled picture by picture from the archie servers as it was reported..

I think maybe you need to go to ASACP and read the definition of CP

Webmaster_Logic · 09-28-2004, 12:36 AM

well the only way i see to get rid of this guy is everyone to start a thread and complain about him..... i will start it off..

p.s since my next post on gfy will be my last you guys/girls hold the fort down....

Webby · 09-28-2004, 12:49 AM

foolio:

Quote:

lol - forgot to post my point.... All these guys running around saying they have proof. IF they were telling the truth why would they not foward it to Lens? If they did they would get thier #1 wish and have this guy banned.... so whats holding them back? I think also these peopel are full of shit unless one of them stepsup and provides hard core proof to Lens.

I have more than enough "proof" that was started a few years back now.

The reason I'm not giving fuck all info out on this shitbag or providing *any* material to others is there is more at stake. I'm not gonna fuck up work done by others for the sake of some peace on a webmaster board which, when you think of it, means nothing.

Much as tho I'd love to post the whole fucking lot - it sure is tempting when the shitbag goes into a state of denial - I know there are more "relevant" things in line for SexEd. Folks have spent a long time over SexEd and a few others. I also still want to remain on friendly terms with the people who trusted me - so nada info outta me! :-)

Screw his crap on GFY! :-)

PS... I doubt he is still doing his CP shit - he knows stuff - and I'm sure his hard drives are spotless - at least the one's he is currently using.

Centurion · 09-28-2004, 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BradM
I sent lens the thread that was obviously deleted that "masterblogger" posted a CP link on.

He said it wasn't proof enough.

Pageviews over morals.

And it has become "He doesn't NOW have cp on his site."
Can't argue with that one!

Doctor Dre · 09-28-2004, 01:21 AM

Ok we might not have proof but we all know he is a deranged individual and a pure troll . I don't see why he's still here

Centurion · 09-28-2004, 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Doctor Dre
Ok we might not have proof but we all know he is a deranged individual and a pure troll . I don't see why he's still here

Using that criteria..you could wipe out 2/3rd of the membership!

foolio · 09-28-2004, 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
Using that criteria..you could wipe out 2/3rd of the membership!

lol, I think you are underestimating here

Webby · 09-28-2004, 01:33 AM

foolio:

Quote:

lol, I think you are underestimating here

You think??

Why would anyone think that?

The board says it all.....

jonesy · 09-28-2004, 01:51 AM

i guess this intro page says it all

http://web.archive.org/web/200011090...education.com/

SmokeyTheBear · 09-28-2004, 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by foolio
but if the quote above is a correct quote I am taking that as Lens not seeing anything. "I haven't seen any child porn on any his stuff. I didn't see any in smokey's email."

So did lens see 14-year old girls nude? Or did he not see them?

You say you seen the pictures - did he say they were 14 or did they just look 14? Shit, I can show you some Asian girls that look 12 that are really like 30, lol. Hell, even little april and twanee (back in the day) tried to pull that shit. Could this have been sometihng like that? I have no idea - never saw pictures don't care to see the pictures. And in no way am I defending CP or SexEd but this ENTIRE thing is just fucking old.

He did indeed see the pictures , as i sent them to him via email.

look a bit on the archive servers , theres still a few pics up, you have to dig, im not going to post them because lensman will delete them for some reason from gfy , yet he asks for people to post the proof, If it isn't proof why does he delete them , they are hotlinked straight from the servers .

09-28-2004, 05:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

With everyone talking about proof of this and proof of that...apparently not a single one that claims to have proof...can provide proof to the owner of this board.

What does that say about all of you that claim to have proof? I know what your claims of proof say to me.

Pig shit. [/B]

You think that picture of the little girl with a bottle of vodka between her legs is OK?

Tipsy · 09-28-2004, 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by evildick
You think that picture of the little girl with a bottle of vodka between her legs is OK?

You have to remember you're talking to someone almost as unstable as sexped although fortunately without the kiddy fixation.

CDSmith · 09-28-2004, 05:44 AM

I looked around his site last year when this issue first came up. I say I saw some very questionable stuff going on there. Very questionable. The child-porn-like innuendo on his site was rampant, a few banners were blatant pandering to kids, including the sex connotation.

I don't know, maybe he's changed some things since. I haven't bothered going back there.

But I expect my word to be enough. If it isn't enough for some of you, then some of you just don't get it. I know what I saw.
I didn't like what I saw.

Now you can believe me or not, makes no nevermind to me. But don't go challenging my word and arguing and disagreeing with me and defending the twit. Because, out of the two of us, it is I that actually went and looked at the site and took the time to look around in order to know what I'm talking about. Some of you talking here.... didn't.

Clear enough?

theking · 09-28-2004, 05:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by evildick
You think that picture of the little girl with a bottle of vodka between her legs is OK?

I do not approve of the picture...but I doubt that it meets the legal criteria of being child porn. It is unimportant what I think...it is Lensmans board.

theking · 09-28-2004, 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tipsy
You have to remember you're talking to someone almost as unstable as sexped although fortunately without the kiddy fixation.

You saying it does not make it true...now does it? BTW...

whoever you are.

JayJay · 09-28-2004, 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sarettah

Now thats fucking proof right there!

09-27-2004, 11:26 PM	#3
sarettah see you later, I'm gone Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 14,111	__________________ All cookies cleared!

09-27-2004, 11:27 PM	#5
smack Push Porn Like Weight. Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Inside .NET Posts: 10,652	sig placement. __________________ Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.

09-27-2004, 11:58 PM	#17
foolio ICQ: 178725656 Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Sunny San Diego Posts: 12,366	lol - forgot to post my point.... All these guys running around saying they have proof. IF they were telling the truth why would they not foward it to Lens? If they did they would get thier #1 wish and have this guy banned.... so whats holding them back? I think also these peopel are full of shit unless one of them stepsup and provides hard core proof to Lens. if he did it - show it and lets get him out. If they dont have proof they shoud STUFU. All I know is this shit is old now. __________________

09-28-2004, 12:03 AM	#20
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	Most of the hardcore images have been erased from the archive after repeated complaints regarding them. But the pictures posted in this thread * quote * and the other were from a well documented childrens porn ring in russia.. __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

09-28-2004, 01:51 AM	#32
jonesy Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 6,688	i guess this intro page says it all http://web.archive.org/web/200011090...education.com/ __________________ . Shooting Bikini Girls

09-27-2004, 11:24 PM	#2
klik Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: san diego Posts: 5,092	i wish my ignore list could ignore the threads about him..

09-27-2004, 11:26 PM	#4
Jace FBOP Class Of 2013 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: bumfuck, ky Posts: 35,562	i have no idea about the pedo thing, i just know he is annoying...prolly way more than lawrenceC ever got.... and definately not an adult webmaster, which I thought lensman was also cracking down on there seems to be no consistency with this board...one day he bans for someone not being a webmaster, then one day you don';t have to be a webmaster

09-27-2004, 11:44 PM	#9
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	URL is 404 so really you are assuming things by the URL

09-28-2004, 12:15 AM	#22
BradM Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: 1123,6536,5231 Posts: 3,397	I sent lens the thread that was obviously deleted that "masterblogger" posted a CP link on. He said it wasn't proof enough. Pageviews over morals.

09-28-2004, 12:36 AM	#25
Webmaster_Logic Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Tampa bay area Posts: 1,886	well the only way i see to get rid of this guy is everyone to start a thread and complain about him..... i will start it off.. p.s since my next post on gfy will be my last you guys/girls hold the fort down....

09-28-2004, 05:44 AM	#36
CDSmith Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: My network is hosted at TECHIEMEDIA.net ...Wait, you meant where am I located at? Oh... okay, I'm in Winnipeg, Canada. Oops. :) Posts: 51,460	I looked around his site last year when this issue first came up. I say I saw some very questionable stuff going on there. Very questionable. The child-porn-like innuendo on his site was rampant, a few banners were blatant pandering to kids, including the sex connotation. I don't know, maybe he's changed some things since. I haven't bothered going back there. But I expect my word to be enough. If it isn't enough for some of you, then some of you just don't get it. I know what I saw. I didn't like what I saw. Now you can believe me or not, makes no nevermind to me. But don't go challenging my word and arguing and disagreeing with me and defending the twit. Because, out of the two of us, it is I that actually went and looked at the site and took the time to look around in order to know what I'm talking about. Some of you talking here.... didn't. Clear enough? __________________ *Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!* ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!! Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634