A comma can make all the difference in the world :thumbsup

The title of your thread was misleading Groove. It says "Lensman a pedophile...". If you would have started a thread saying "Mike Okitch a pedophile...", I would be on you like Homer Simpson on a donut.

I am aware that you did not mean to piss Lensman or anybody off by doing this.

I also understand the purpose of your thread.

But you could have chosen another title.

Just imagine someone starting a thread "Groove a pedophile is using adult.com as a referee". People would read it and think "Shit, Groove is a pedo?" Think of the damage this would do to your reputation! That's the only point I'm trying to get across here.

Cheers :)

Mike

I accept your apology Groove.
Sometimes punctuation can make a difference in the intended meaning.

Just to make sure your apology is clear ...
without confusion ...
do you believe I am a pedophile yes or no ??

Lolita is a term which refers to pre-pubescent girls who pedophiles find to be sexually attractive. Just because there are a lot of sites using the term is does not make it legal or moral.

He's selling under 18s access to the "adults only" section of his site!

And who do you think he is targetting with those banners?

The same here.

LOL, OK now I get your point :) And maybe I'm wrong, but somehow I doubt that
anyone would have thought that I was accusing Lensman of being a pedophile.

However that term has now changed and gone more underground as a result of Google and other search engines.
I've not kept up with the issue but the underground slang changes as fast as the authorities can keep up.


No - but they will black listed.
I have personally experimented with some of those terms.
Google.com will black list you.
So don't do it.

Who is he ??
How were ttey able to do that if the site assuming had a REAL ADULT VERIFICATION SERVICE !!!!
Whoever you are talking about - let me encourage you - to have some courage - and report this issue to the police finally. Fuck you guys - don't you have any courage to deal with the police???


Lets see the banners so I can give you an opinion.
Curious - the guy sounds like an asshole.
Who is it specifically - coward???

Or ya - just can't say ... its the - I don't proof but I heard from a friend of a friend of a friends aunt????

I was *NOT* apologizing to you! I was apolgizing to anyone who thought this
thread was an attack on Lensman or Adult.com as this was not my intention.

I believe that you've had CP on Sexeducation.com, I believe you've offered to sell minors access to adults-only content, and I believe that Sexeducation.com has been used to attract pre-teens, teens and pedophiles for "sex education" by Dad@ and friends. Do you think it is unreasonable to conclude from these facts that you are pedophile?

So you were banned from Google for having "experimental" CP terms in your headers?

He is you - Sexeducation, AKA Materblogger, AKA Dad@, AKA John Beacock.
I was quoting you directly from another thread (but you knew that already).

Scroll up this thread a bit and you'll see them (but you knew that already also).

I have posted proof in this thread.

Are you saying that I've fabricated anything that I've posted?

BTW Sexped, I am going out now. So you will have
to play troll with the other kids for a while. :321GFY

several child porn pictures that have been archived have since been deleted upon request.

LENSMAN , if you contact the archive they will confirm the deletions of child pornography from the servers.

50 sick fucking perverts

Apparently you need to post or email him some child porn to get the point across...

I did. I emailed him several of the archived pictures before they took them down. I also included details on where the pictures came from and the editing that was done by sexped..

I sometimes understand lensmans ways, but this tops the cake.

Either lensmans spam filter is set too high , or he is missing something ??


When proof was posted in one of the threads ( like someone posted the actual child porn in the thread , lensman deleted the thread ) but yet sexped remains..

ahh... conspiracy... *locked* :glugglug

I haven't seen any child porn on any his stuff. I didn't see any in smokey's email.

And no one else has been able to forward me any proof on this guy.

And Groove basically called me a pedo in the thread title, so I guess it backfired on him.