Sexeducation: Sponsor Guidelines - GoFuckYourself.com

Lensman · 09-26-2004, 12:05 PM

Do not use any of our programs if there is any content on your site targeted to people under the age of 18.

If anyone is aware of this, please let me know by email.

DarkJedi · 09-26-2004, 12:07 PM

first.

see sig.

crockett · 09-26-2004, 12:08 PM

well when he uses the e-mail name... [email protected] you be the judge whom he is targeting

polish_aristocrat · 09-26-2004, 12:08 PM

I think www.sexeducation.com - although it says "you have to be 21+", generally attracts minors, because they are more likely looking for sex education than adults...

TDF · 09-26-2004, 12:08 PM

kmanrox · 09-26-2004, 12:09 PM

hmm Lensowned.

fris · 09-26-2004, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lensman
Do not use any of our programs if there is any content on your site targeted to people under the age of 18.

If anyone is aware of this, please let me know by email.

are you still looking for the sp2 popup code?

wyldblyss · 09-26-2004, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by crockett
well when he uses the e-mail name... [email protected] you be the judge whom he is targeting

I agree with you there. It is obvious what this guy is up to and he also seems to enjoy the fact that he can flaunt it and no one really does anything about it.

Trent Edison · 09-26-2004, 12:12 PM

Ehh... sig.

Johny Traffic · 09-26-2004, 12:12 PM

I cant work out if this guy sexed is for real or not, is he just a sig whore or just a twat?

boobmaster · 09-26-2004, 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by polish_aristocrat
I think www.sexeducation.com - although it says "you have to be 21+", generally attracts minors, because they are more likely looking for sex education than adults...

You make a very good point

NoCarrier · 09-26-2004, 12:16 PM

Even if 1% of what people say about sexeducation is true, I would never let him promote my program.

That guy is too fucking weird. It's obvious he has serious mental stability problems.

Sexeducation and porn don't go very well together.

If you were looking for porn, would you type that domain name? Not really.

polish_aristocrat · 09-26-2004, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier
Even if 1% of what people say about sexeducation is true, I would never let him promote my program.

That guy is too fucking weird. It's obvious he has serious mental stability problems.

Sexeducation and porn don't go very well together.

If you were looking for porn, would you type that domain name? Not really.

I don't think he even wants to promote any affiliate programs.

Manowar · 09-26-2004, 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
first.

see sig.

M_M · 09-26-2004, 12:21 PM

It's a sad day when Lensman opens threads to fuel the sexeducation drama

That worthless piece of shit doesn't deserve this Lens, I can't believe you're giving him the attention he's craving.

chase · 09-26-2004, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Johny Traffic
I cant work out if this guy sexed is for real or not, is he just a sig whore or just a twat?

He sometimes sounds like a kid himself with his psuedo-intellectual nonsense. That "bow to the power of a masterblogger" line just makes me go

I try to stay out of the whole "pedo" mess, because I wasn't here when it all happened, but I can't take anybody seriously that spouts out crap that a 15 year old would say....

sexeducation · 09-26-2004, 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lensman
Do not use any of our programs if there is any content on your site targeted to people under the age of 18.

If anyone is aware of this, please let me know by email.

Understood.

There is NO content currently on SexEducation.com "targeted" to those under the age of 21.

It is a venue of ADULT ONLY intercourse.
All graphics will be 2257 compliant.

Thank you.

bdld · 09-26-2004, 12:29 PM

hopefully we will soon see "so fucking banned" under his name.

candyflip · 09-26-2004, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Understood.

There is NO content currently on SexEducation.com "targeted" to those under the age of 21.

It is a venue of ADULT ONLY intercourse.
All graphics will be 2257 compliant.

Thank you.

He's not "targetting" but sure as hell "hoping" they come see it.

I love how he uses the quotation makes.

DarkJedi · 09-26-2004, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier
Even if 1% of what people say about sexeducation is true, I would never let him promote my program.

You don't have a program.

dig420 · 09-26-2004, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by candyflip
He's not "targetting" but sure as hell "hoping" they come see it.

I love how he uses the quotation makes.

yes he is. Not too long ago he was advertising his site on an equine forum for young girls.

NoCarrier · 09-26-2004, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
You don't have a program.

Stop being a smartass. You call everyone a sheep, but you keep posting in threads about sexed.

sexeducation · 09-26-2004, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by candyflip
He's not "targetting" but sure as hell "hoping" they come see it.

I love how he uses the quotation makes.

You've been owned by the MasterBlogger SOOOOOO MANY TIMES ...

give it up...

sexeducation · 09-26-2004, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier
Stop being a smartass. You call everyone a sheep, but you keep posting in threads about sexed.

And they will continue ...
as their feelings have been hurt for being proven absolutely wrong about me ...

and they don't have the courage to apologize ...

MattO · 09-26-2004, 12:44 PM

Here is one of his banners that he was using on the horse forums to advertise his site:

NoCarrier · 09-26-2004, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MattO
Here is one of his banners that he was using on the horse forums to advertise his site:

WTF?

M_M · 09-26-2004, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MattO
Here is one of his banners that he was using on the horse forums to advertise his site:

thats fucked up

SmokeyTheBear · 09-26-2004, 12:50 PM

Wow this is news.. Lensman doesnt mind his graphics on servers that also contain child porn.. ?? Strange turn of events..

SmokeyTheBear · 09-26-2004, 12:51 PM

I bet someone could make some good money buying cp domains and forwarding them to realitycash. I have never heard of any other sponsor that allows such traffic..

Naughty · 09-26-2004, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by fris
are you still looking for the sp2 popup code?

anybody can get that from any page that still has popup when you are using sp2. All one needs to do is look at the source, no?

Tipsy · 09-26-2004, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MattO
Here is one of his banners that he was using on the horse forums to advertise his site:

The banner says it all. The target audience for that is obviously minors. Who's gonna e-mail it to Lens then?

Lensman · 09-26-2004, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by fris
are you still looking for the sp2 popup code?

$1000 for working code that makes real exit pops.

BRISK · 09-26-2004, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MattO
Here is one of his banners that he was using on the horse forums to advertise his site:

sexeducation · 09-26-2004, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tipsy
The banner says it all. The target audience for that is obviously minors. Who's gonna e-mail it to Lens then?

That banner was served at Free-Banners.com for almost three years and had 3 MILLION impressions into GENERAL AUDIENCE demographics without a single complaint.

SexEducation.com does NOT contain a general audience area now and therefore does not use that banner.

It also maintained a 3.61 click thru ratio - which means it was twice as effective as other banners in it's class.

It is only in this community where the immature do not understand the text of the banner that there has been an issue.

So let me translate it for the illiterate ...

"Mom & Dad never had social discussion like this!"

duh !!!!

friggen wannabes

EDIT: added ...."thate ther has been an issue"

Centurion · 09-26-2004, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lensman
Do not use any of our programs if there is any content on your site targeted to people under the age of 18.

If anyone is aware of this, please let me know by email.

Email on its way.

Plus note what SexEd says:

"There is NO content currently on SexEducation.com "targeted" to those under the age of 21." The definitive word here is "CURRENTLY"..even he ADMITS he has done so in the past!

Do you want your programs associated with someone who DID have material targeted and used by minors in the past? Yes, he did get caught and remove the material..but that doesn't excuse his past behavior.

SmokeyTheBear · 09-26-2004, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lensman
$1000 for working code that makes real exit pops.

It just doesn't work like that anymore.

You can hijack the back button.

You can make popups that hide, but popups when clicking the X are dead.

I have not seen anything yet to do this and i dont predict you seeing anything of this sort anytime soon.. not before google browser starts splitting the market.

Head · 09-26-2004, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by crockett
well when he uses the e-mail name... [email protected] you be the judge whom he is targeting

agreed

johnbosh · 09-26-2004, 02:06 PM

Fake Nick · 09-26-2004, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear

I have not seen anything yet to do this and i dont predict you seeing anything of this sort anytime soon.. not before google browser starts splitting the market.

look harder

sexeducation · 09-26-2004, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
Email on its way.

Plus note what SexEd says:

"There is NO content currently on SexEducation.com "targeted" to those under the age of 21." The definitive word here is "CURRENTLY"..even he ADMITS he has done so in the past!

Do you want your programs associated with someone who DID have material targeted and used by minors in the past? Yes, he did get caught and remove the material..but that doesn't excuse his past behavior.

Go for it ...
keep digging your hole ...

Yes there was content on SexEducation intended for Parents to share with their teenagers.

The most famous of that was an article entitled "Let Teens Have Sex. The arguement why teenagers should be allowed to have sex. by [email protected]" The essay - went through all the most common arguements of why teenagers should be allowed to have sex and concluded irrefutabley that abstinence from partner sex until not affected by adolescent hormones was the logical "adult" thing to do.

But you know that.
As you and LM have previously posted about that essay - skipping the thesis (that's a topic conclusion) of abstinence being the right thing to do.

YOU OWE ME AN APOLOGY ...
have the courage to say you are wrong when you are!

MetaformX · 09-26-2004, 02:08 PM

I am totally out of the loop on this sexeducation guy...sad

SmokeyTheBear · 09-26-2004, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick
look harder

show me , i will eat my words, until then my words stand .. there is no exit method that doesn't require user interaction. 0% nada..

Centurion · 09-26-2004, 02:13 PM

Lens,

As you can see, his "man" admits he had material that could be accessed by minors in his last post:

"Yes there was content on SexEducation intended for Parents to share with their teenagers."

Do you need MORE than his OWN ADMISSION??

As evident in the html files of his chat program that had minors on it that has been sent to you..he had NO structure in place that kept kids out. It was a wide open site for ANYONE to access. It doesn't matter that he says it was INTENDED for Parents, when we all know in the end, NO webmaster should leave material on his site that kids can access!

Juicy D. Links · 09-26-2004, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lensman
$1000 for working code that makes real exit pops.

20k plus 5 hookers in Vegas

MattO · 09-26-2004, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaformX
I am totally out of the loop on this sexeducation guy...sad

you're lucky. Once you've followed a couple of his threads, you're tainted for life.

sexeducation · 09-26-2004, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
Lens,

As you can see, his "man" admits he had material that could be accessed by minors in his last post:

"Yes there was content on SexEducation intended for Parents to share with their teenagers."

Do you need MORE than his OWN ADMISSION??

As evident in the html files of his chat program that had minors on it that has been sent to you..he had NO structure in place that kept kids out. It was a wide open site for ANYONE to access. It doesn't matter that he says it was INTENDED for Parents, when we all know in the end, NO webmaster should leave material on his site that kids can access!

Once again more lies ...
SexEducation.com as Archives.org shows had the most extreme ICRA.org rating since I believe 2000.

I also coded my own controls using Aestiva which expired all URLs automatically after 30 minutes of none use.

and now we come to exactly where we met and disagreed FLUID OF FUCK FACE ...

let me quote you "no webmaster should leave material on a site that kids can access!"

"NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE FLUIDS ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN NAME!"

and that's where you and I clashed on another board many moons ago - remember???

09-26-2004, 02:23 PM

Here's an archive of a page that he used to have on his site where he was basically saying that minors could look at the porn on his site if they paid him $100. Pretty crazy stuff.

http://web.archive.org/web/200010171...t_content.html

Why anyone would risk letting this lunatic into their program is beyond me.

sexeducation · 09-26-2004, 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by evildick
Here's an archive of a page that he used to have on his site where he was basically saying that minors could look at the porn on his site if they paid him $100. Pretty crazy stuff.

http://web.archive.org/web/200010171...t_content.html

Why anyone would risk letting this lunatic into their program is beyond me.

the text of the link is below...
it's an ENGLISH version of a warning for teenagers NOT to access the restricted areas of SexEducation.com without direct adult supervision. I only have ONE area now - ADULT ONLY.

I figure it will take another ten years for some communities to understand that some sexual topics are general audience, some are mature and some are restricted.

I am only going to have ONE area - ADULT ONLY.

Please do NOT get membership as your statement above definitely proves you're a child.

YEAR 2000 / ARCHIVE.ORG

RESTRICTED AREAS EXPLANATION

This website costs money to operate, build and expand! In particular, there is a network bandwidth charge for each and every webpage and graphic retrieved. As a result in most places throughout the world, we have the right to limit access to something that costs us money.

Therefore, if you are a teenager visiting this website WITHOUT DIRECT ADULT SUPERVISION THIS WEBSITE IS NOT FREE. The cost per page retrieved is $100 USD dollars each.

If you have a parent directly supervising you, then and only then, is this website free for you to view.

If you are an adult over the age of 21 - this website is free to view, however if you allow your children to view this website unsupervised, then the cost per page retrieved is 100 USD.

We reserve the right to prosecute thefts to the fullest extent of the law.

MattO · 09-26-2004, 02:32 PM

What a maroon.

09-26-2004, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

Therefore, if you are a teenager visiting this website WITHOUT DIRECT ADULT SUPERVISION THIS WEBSITE IS NOT FREE. The cost per page retrieved is $100 USD dollars each.

Translation:
"Come on in children, just make sure you get your checkbook out before you check out the smut I stole and the child porn pics I reposted from usenet."

09-26-2004, 12:05 PM	#1
Lensman GFY Chaperone Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Adult.com Posts: 9,846	Sexeducation: Sponsor Guidelines Do not use any of our programs if there is any content on your site targeted to people under the age of 18. If anyone is aware of this, please let me know by email.

09-26-2004, 12:08 PM	#3
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	well when he uses the e-mail name... [email protected] you be the judge whom he is targeting __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

09-26-2004, 12:08 PM	#4
polish_aristocrat Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 40,377	I think www.sexeducation.com - although it says "you have to be 21+", generally attracts minors, because they are more likely looking for sex education than adults... __________________ I don't use ICQ anymore.

09-26-2004, 12:08 PM	#5
TDF Triple OG nigga on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: in the BP4L family compound Posts: 27,296	__________________ Sig heil

09-26-2004, 12:09 PM	#6
kmanrox aka K-Man Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Gutter Posts: 29,292	hmm Lensowned. __________________ Crypto HODLr Crypto mining Angel investor

09-26-2004, 12:07 PM	#2
DarkJedi No Refunds Issued. Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: GFY Posts: 28,300	first. see sig.

09-26-2004, 12:12 PM	#9
Trent Edison Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Freeport 7 Posts: 6,132	Ehh... sig. __________________

09-26-2004, 12:12 PM	#10
Johny Traffic Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 5,461	I cant work out if this guy sexed is for real or not, is he just a sig whore or just a twat? __________________ hosted flv's, hosted galleries, morphing rss feeds, free content, free sites, hosted blog

09-26-2004, 12:16 PM	#12
NoCarrier We need more free porn Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Montreal Posts: 16,356	Even if 1% of what people say about sexeducation is true, I would never let him promote my program. That guy is too fucking weird. It's obvious he has serious mental stability problems. Sexeducation and porn don't go very well together. If you were looking for porn, would you type that domain name? Not really. __________________

09-26-2004, 12:21 PM	#15
M_M Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 1,167	It's a sad day when Lensman opens threads to fuel the sexeducation drama That worthless piece of shit doesn't deserve this Lens, I can't believe you're giving him the attention he's craving.

09-26-2004, 12:29 PM	#18
bdld $100,000 Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 11,452	hopefully we will soon see "so fucking banned" under his name.

09-26-2004, 12:44 PM	#25
MattO The O is for Oohhh Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: AUSTIN TEJAS Posts: 10,861	Here is one of his banners that he was using on the horse forums to advertise his site:

09-26-2004, 12:50 PM	#28
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	Wow this is news.. Lensman doesnt mind his graphics on servers that also contain child porn.. ?? Strange turn of events.. __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

09-26-2004, 12:51 PM	#29
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	I bet someone could make some good money buying cp domains and forwarding them to realitycash. I have never heard of any other sponsor that allows such traffic.. __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

09-26-2004, 02:06 PM	#38
johnbosh Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: The Netherlands, Rotterdam Posts: 8,965	lol

09-26-2004, 02:08 PM	#41
MetaformX Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 6,704	I am totally out of the loop on this sexeducation guy...sad __________________

09-26-2004, 02:13 PM	#43
Centurion Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: SeATtle Posts: 6,033	Lens, As you can see, his "man" admits he had material that could be accessed by minors in his last post: "Yes there was content on SexEducation intended for Parents to share with their teenagers." Do you need MORE than his OWN ADMISSION?? As evident in the html files of his chat program that had minors on it that has been sent to you..he had NO structure in place that kept kids out. It was a wide open site for ANYONE to access. It doesn't matter that he says it was INTENDED for Parents, when we all know in the end, NO webmaster should leave material on his site that kids can access! __________________

09-26-2004, 02:23 PM	#47
evildick Guest Posts: n/a	Here's an archive of a page that he used to have on his site where he was basically saying that minors could look at the porn on his site if they paid him $100. Pretty crazy stuff. http://web.archive.org/web/200010171...t_content.html Why anyone would risk letting this lunatic into their program is beyond me.

09-26-2004, 02:32 PM	#49
MattO The O is for Oohhh Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: AUSTIN TEJAS Posts: 10,861	What a maroon.