GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Serious question for the Kerry supporters... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=361517)

JasonB 09-24-2004 04:22 PM

Kerry's stance on the issues.

=Reproductive & Women's Rights
Supports keeping abortion safe & legal
Supports the Violence Against Women Act

=US Economy
Supports raising the national minimum wage
Opposes Privatizing Social Security

=Tax Breaks For The Rich
Opposes Additional Tax Cuts For Corporations
Opposes Tax Cuts For People Making Over $200k

=Religion & Government
Opposes Organized Prayer In Public School
Opposes Federal Funding Of Religious Organizations

=Environment
Opposes Oil Drilling In The Arctic Wildlife Refuge
Supports Mandatory Clean Air Emission Standards

=Equal Rights
Opposes Amending the Constitution To Ban Gay Marriage
Supports Civil Unions For Gays And Lesbians

=Firearms
Supports Requiring Manufacturers To Have Safety Devices On All Guns
Supports Requiring Background Checks On Gun Show Purchases

=Death Penalty
Supports National Review of Death Penalty Fairness

=Education
Supports Additional Funding For Higher Education
Opposes Vouchers Taking Away Funding From Public Schools For Private & Religous Schools


*Bush has the exact opposite stance on all issues.

baddog 09-24-2004 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JasonB
Kerry's stance on the issues.

=Reproductive & Women's Rights
Supports keeping abortion safe & legal
Supports the Violence Against Women Act

=US Economy
Supports raising the national minimum wage
Opposes Privatizing Social Security

=Tax Breaks For The Rich
Opposes Additional Tax Cuts For Corporations
Opposes Tax Cuts For People Making Over $200k

=Religion & Government
Opposes Organized Prayer In Public School
Opposes Federal Funding Of Religious Organizations

=Environment
Opposes Oil Drilling In The Arctic Wildlife Refuge
Supports Mandatory Clean Air Emission Standards

=Equal Rights
Opposes Amending the Constitution To Ban Gay Marriage
Supports Civil Unions For Gays And Lesbians

=Firearms
Supports Requiring Manufacturers To Have Safety Devices On All Guns
Supports Requiring Background Checks On Gun Show Purchases

=Death Penalty
Supports National Review of Death Penalty Fairness

=Education
Supports Additional Funding For Higher Education
Opposes Vouchers Taking Away Funding From Public Schools For Private & Religous Schools


*Bush has the exact opposite stance on all issues.

well, at least you had an intelligent response, even if I don't personally agree with some of his positions

kenny 09-24-2004 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JasonB


*Bush has the exact opposite stance on all issues.

*So does Kerry probably on half of those..

:1orglaugh Sorry I couldn't resist making a joke about the flip flop

jayeff 09-24-2004 04:51 PM

This isn't a "serious" question because it has nothing to do with the reality of US politics.

Heaven knows the last time a presidential candidate wrote his own speeches or shaped his own policies. Or for that matter the last time a party didn't blow with the wind to try to get elected. In short, everything you can say or imply about Kerry is equally true of Bush.

You think either party offers us the best possible presidential candidate? Of course they don't. What we get is either a mouthpiece for a single power block, or if there isn't one block strong enough to force its candidate on everyone else, we get someone who is an agreeable compromise for whoever is sharing power at the top of the party.

Nor is there a president in the past 100 years or more who has actually delivered on election promises: at least not the important ones. That's why we still have an education system which produces results comparable with eastern Europe and why longevity in the US is now closer to third-world standards than those of developed countries.

The only reason to vote is to try to put into power a party that might be marginally less damaging than the other. There is no point whatever in listening to what the candidates say, much less worrying about who is the most photogenic or who talks the talk best.

M_M 09-24-2004 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jayeff
This isn't a "serious" question because it has nothing to do with the reality of US politics.

Heaven knows the last time a presidential candidate wrote his own speeches or shaped his own policies. Or for that matter the last time a party didn't blow with the wind to try to get elected. In short, everything you can say or imply about Kerry is equally true of Bush.

You think either party offers us the best possible presidential candidate? Of course they don't. What we get is either a mouthpiece for a single power block, or if there isn't one block strong enough to force its candidate on everyone else, we get someone who is an agreeable compromise for whoever is sharing power at the top of the party.

Nor is there a president in the past 100 years or more who has actually delivered on election promises: at least not the important ones. That's why we still have an education system which produces results comparable with eastern Europe and why longevity in the US is now closer to third-world standards than those of developed countries.

The only reason to vote is to try to put into power a party that might be marginally less damaging than the other. There is no point whatever in listening to what the candidates say, much less worrying about who is the most photogenic or who talks the talk best.

very well said

president is more like a spokes person than a leader

titmowse 09-24-2004 05:03 PM

John Kerry has proven he's capable of finding and stopping the financial networks that support terrorist organizations. John Kerry opened the investigations into a group that traded arms and dealt in drugs while supporting tyrannical governments in Central America. You might be familiar with the investigation, it was called Iran/Contra. In addition, John Kerry stood strong against opposition from everyone, including members of his own party when he shut down the Bank of Credit and Commerce International/BCCI.

SuckOnThis 09-24-2004 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts


What positions has Kerry taken that you agree with*?







Getting rid of ASScraft

pornJester 09-24-2004 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RocHard
His position is that he is not Bush.

Platinum Dave 09-24-2004 06:45 PM

One reason to vote for Kerry no matter how much you dont like him.

Is to get that bitch ass mother fucker George Bush the fuck out of the white house

Masturbationman 09-24-2004 07:04 PM

First off I think that michael moore is smart for only one reason and that is becasue he found a way to make 100 million dollars. Other than that he is a loser. Why did he not donate most of the profits to 9/11 victums? Because he did it for the money!!! Can't anyone see that?

MM

woj 09-24-2004 07:05 PM

50 Serious question for the Kerry supporters

SuckOnThis 09-24-2004 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Masturbationman
First off I think that michael moore is smart for only one reason and that is becasue he found a way to make 100 million dollars. Other than that he is a loser. Why did he not donate most of the profits to 9/11 victums? Because he did it for the money!!! Can't anyone see that?

MM

Dear dumbass,

He did give the profits of his movie to the families of the 9/11 victims.

Masturbationman 09-24-2004 07:36 PM

First off I think that michael moore is smart for only one reason and that is becasue he found a way to make 100 million dollars. Other than that he is a loser. Why did he not donate most of the profits to 9/11 victums? Because he did it for the money!!! Can't anyone see that?

MM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123