![]() |
Quote:
"John Beacock will NEVER BACK DOWN - EVER." ; ) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"Any Father that permits the circumcision of their daughter should be castrated." [email protected] |
Quote:
Well, he would probably be able to tell me if the phone number I found was you or not, wouldn't he ? I mean, if I post it and it isn't you, then I haven't broken any rules. I just posted a phone number that I happened to find on a site. But if it is you, then I would be posting personal info on another member of gfy and that would be clearly against the rules. But, damn, I keep forgetting, you don't ever lie, so it must not be your nunber so it would be ok to post it right ? |
Quote:
It's not true. I win. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
However, my phone number is 1-403-619-2739 and you can phone me RIGHT NOW ... DING DONG the lights are on but no-one is home ...Hello McFly ...duh Homer ... |
Master Blogger do you continue to ignore my specific questions for a reason? You claim to answer all questions. Feel free to admit you're "pinned".
Specific Questions: 1) What act of law, special certification or right granted to a Canadian Citizen permits you to violate Canada's Federal Laws governing Child Pornography and the Internet? 2) Where can I find clear and credible information backing up your self admitted right to "do what ever you want - go where ever you want."? |
Is that the same numer you gave Gonzo but keep refusing to answer ?
|
Quote:
I have NEVER violated any law that I was or currently aware of. Quote:
My links to my past websites ... and continue to visit my current website over the next six months ... from that research you will discover my research and it sexual discoveries ... my current campaign is - "Vaginal orgasm is a lie." |
PEDO:
Quote:
I've only seen enormous volumes of crass stupidity from you so far. I sure ain't alone in these opinions either - and not just from folks on GFY. You are the subject of some "concern" elsewhere, tho the word "courage" has not been mentioned yet. I must be more patient and wait for that word. Tho plenty of other comments like "I have seen many child porn sites in my career - this is another I'm pleased to leave" plus lots of use of words like "pedo", "this man is a sicko" and "this is a familiar dialogue with child molestors". But then, - you know all these people are wrong, tho that is what they do for a living - deal with scum like you. |
Quote:
Have you ever posted links to any public or private but not Goverment Agency website with Child Pornography anywhere on the Internet in an attempt to have said website shut down? |
PEDO:
Quote:
Sheesh... you are totally insane. It's amazing how far your deviant mind will go to have some appaearance of "legitimacy". But then, that's what pedo's do. They are all "innocent" and only have the concern of others uppermost in their minds. You are just so damned sick - you ain't got one clue. |
PEDO:
"But then, that's what pedo's do. They are all "innocent" and only have the concern of others uppermost in their minds." This is why you "need" GFY isn't it John? To "proove" something... |
Quote:
And once again ... [email protected] and John Beacock apologizes to the entire internet for having that fucking website shut down in 15 minutes. |
Quote:
Can you confirm that statement to be true or false please: "John Beacock, in a bid to fight against Child Pornography, from time to time surfs websites in search of Child Pornography. John Beacock further agrees that when he is searching for Child Pornography it is soley for reasearch and never for sexual satisfaction or to prey on Children. The one and only time John Beacock posted a direct link to Child Pornography on the website GoFuckYourself.com it was done by mistake and in anger." True or false? |
WarChild:
Quote:
He did better on both counts. He actually published child porn on his sites along with another load of images he ripped off from others (which were not related to CP). He later claimed the rips were "public domain" tho the photographers/copyright owners did not agree:-) If you want some of John's nice pics of kids having oral sex with adults and other sex acts with minors - sure, got em all on CD. Copies have been supplied to several interest parties - tho these folks ain't other pedos :-) John also knows all about "communicating" with children and marketed his websites to encourage children to visit and enable him to teach them all about "sex education". "John" is also known by police forces in serveral countries. First time the name was mentioned, the reply came back, "You mean that guy from Calgary?" "John E Beacock" is well known - tho there is another "background story" to the saga. Of course he has violated Canadian law. He has also violated US law. Tho he may not have a mindset to admit any of that, but "avoid it" instead - the usual pattern. This guy think he is "special" and no one can touch him - silly guy! :-) |
Quote:
In the past I had used an automated downloading software product called "QuadSucker". From the autodownloads in an unscientific manner - solely by counting up the number of accidentally downloaded CP images I came to the conclusion that .RU was the worst CP distributor offender. I then banned all of Russia (.RU) from obtaining a membership on the domains I owned. Currently - I ownly download form 2257 compliant suppliers and no longer use QuadSucker. Currently - there is only two suppliers with the guts to handle my type of sexual exploration ... Adult.com and Playboy.com Both use NATS ... an independent tracking system where adult webmasters are protected from "shaving". |
PEDO:
Quote:
Was this some jealousy that others were running a CP site and you were stopped from running yours? Or was it, once again, your "state of being indignant" and horrified that such things exist and your concern was for the children of the world? |
Quote:
The Account Holder of "Sex Education" known also as Dad@ is a known and proven Criminal. The Account Holder of "Sex Education" known also as Dad@ is a known and proven Pedophile. Go ahead sue me for Libel if you think I'm wrong. |
WarChild:
Quote:
We'll be hearing about his "research" next and "vaginal orgasm". He's sick... |
nuff said ...
thread terminated ... how did it taste? |
PEDO:
No... the thread is not finished. It is not you who will decide that. You avoided all issues concerning your publication of child porn - tho this is "normal" in your "condition". Do you remember any of the images of kids on your child porn site John?? I can - they made me sick and they had the same effect on others. Did you use QuadSucker to collect them - "accidentally"? |
Sex Education completely owned and "pinned".
Can offer no defense and changes his story, after the fact, to try to worm out of situations. Known and proven Pedophile. Known and proven Criminal. |
WarChild:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Basic_man:
Quote:
Another Pedo Drama Queen trying to be significant.... |
Quote:
I can't get exactly what I want so I'm gonna throw a big fat tantrum. How fucking old are you, BTW? Seriously! |
Quote:
And not only did I delete your duplicate post Serge banned your attention starved ass. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Doesn't change the fact that my posts were altered right after I posted them. I don't require attention here - I require my potential suppliers to be DESENSITIZED to my type of posting which PUSHES BUTTONS - for the causes I choose to promote. I am tired of having suppliers cancel without a reason being supplied. Yet - here I am on the worlds busiest adult webmaster board with one of the most well known handles. I am going to recruit new webmasters to promote my choosen affilate programs and supply them with articles to post on other boards and into usenet and blogging syndication websites. Articles like "Let Teens have sex. The arguement why teenagers should be allowed to have sex. [email protected] says - YES !!!!!!" (Which is an abstinence only article - sorry no drama) Are we desensitized yet? |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123