![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Entrepreneur
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 31,429
|
Congress Drafts Law Banning Video Voyeur Photography
WASHINGTON -- Calling video voyeurism the new frontier of stalking, the House on Tuesday approved legislation to make it a crime to secretly photograph or videotape people, often for lascivious purposes.
Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said the issue of surreptitious videotaping has become "a huge privacy concern" with the miniaturization of technology and the proliferation of cell phone cameras. People have used these devices for purposes like secretly taking pictures beneath women's skirts in such places as school locker rooms, department store dressing rooms and private homes. Rep. Michael Oxley, R-Ohio, a former FBI agent who has promoted the legislation, said there are were many Web sites devoted to such pictures, where they "can be instantly posted on the Internet for millions to view." Secretly photographing people in a compromising position is against the law in some states, but there is no federal law. Oxley said the legislation could serve as a model for states that have not enacted anti-voyeurism laws. The bill would make it a crime to videotape or photograph the naked or underwear-covered private parts of a person without consent when the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
__________________
![]() from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION! *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 35,218
|
Fuck there goes my favorite hobby...But seriously this is going to screw a lot of web sites...
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 14,423
|
hasn't it always been illegal? they'll just fake it now anyway.
__________________
no sig |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
want to get in shape
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: on the lake
Posts: 12,329
|
Key wording....
without a reasonabloe expectation of privacy.... I would think a good lawyer can keep the party girl stuff in the mix... I am sure they are targeting the real stalketrs, and perves out there with this law.....( those are the dangerous ones) |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,377
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
I don't use ICQ anymore. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
SEO Connoisseur
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Brantford, Ontario
Posts: 17,109
|
Quote:
so the answer is yes, it is fake. What this bill proposes is to stop stalkers and sick fuckers from videotaping or snapping pictures of under your wife's or daughters skirt while walking or going up an esculator.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Let's do some business.
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The dirty south.
Posts: 18,781
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life "I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be." |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Entrepreneur
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 31,429
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
![]() from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION! *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
jellyfish
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 71,528
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ¤ª"˜¨๑۩۞۩๑¨˜"ª¤
Posts: 18,481
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 1,239
|
Wont affect 90% of the sites out there who are presently doing this.
__________________
Sig is on vacation... (I wish I could vacation as long as my sig has...) |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |