woman attacked by a pitbull video.

[Sami]

Anyone seen this?

http://www.assustador.com.br/videos10/acidentes/18.mpg

It looks like a cop getting attacked by a pitbull.


Not much of gore to warn about, but it is some scary shit!

[Spunky]

Those dogs scare me..they should be outlawed

[xxxoutsourcing]

Yea seen it before, nice doggy doggy nice doggy.

[reynold]

that's horrible.. scary.

[galleryseek]

those fucking dogs should be killed, no use for them.

that big lard of shit owning a dog like that.

[WarChild]

It's not the dog that's dangerous. It's the dog's owner.

The ignorant people, calling for outlawing Pittbulls should really get informed. You'd have to outlaw every strong breed of animal.

http://www.fataldogattacks.com/

Fatal dog attacks happen much less often than fatal traffic accidents. Should you be able to own a car if you might accidentally kill somebody with it? Yes but you have to be responsible with your car. The same applies to dogs.

[BrainDead]

the dog is really scary! the owner should make some action! she shouldn't let the dog on the street so that it can't harm anyone!

[WarChild]

Originally posted by BrainDead
the dog is really scary! the owner should make some action! she shouldn't let the dog on the street so that it can't harm anyone!

But outlawing the breed of dog is not the answer.

When Thugs can't get pittbulls, they'll move to another breed. A German Sheppard is just as likely to attack a person as a pittbull. You don't hear cries for outlawing them.

[Lace]

My pit is a pussy.

[galleryseek]

Originally posted by WarChild
It's not the dog that's dangerous. It's the dog's owner.

The ignorant people, calling for outlawing Pittbulls should really get informed. You'd have to outlaw every strong breed of animal.

http://www.fataldogattacks.com/

Fatal dog attacks happen much less often than fatal traffic accidents. Should you be able to own a car if you might accidentally kill somebody with it? Yes but you have to be responsible with your car. The same applies to dogs.

what the fucking shit is the need for such a dog? they're naturally aggressive, right? i dont know shit about dogs but I think it's safe to say that some breeds are more aggressive than others.

me n' my gf were outside and a dog like that one comes running up to us out of no where and jumped up on her and bit her, not badly, but still did, then took off.

they're worthless. get a normal fucking dog.

[WarChild]

Originally posted by galleryseek
what the fucking shit is the need for such a dog? they're naturally aggressive, right? i dont know shit about dogs but I think it's safe to say that some breeds are more aggressive than others.

me n' my gf were outside and a dog like that one comes running up to us out of no where and jumped up on her and bit her, not badly, but still did, then took off.

they're worthless. get a normal fucking dog.

You are 100% completely off base.

Read this site: http://www.fataldogattacks.com and get informed.

A Pittbull is no more likely to be aggressive by nature than any other breed of dog. Seriously, read the site. It will open your eyes.

[SomeCreep]

Originally posted by Sami
Anyone seen this?

http://www.assustador.com.br/videos10/acidentes/18.mpg

It looks like a cop getting attacked by a pitbull.


Not much of gore to warn about, but it is some scary shit!

Damn, if that was me getting attacked, I would've showed no mercy. I would've ripped the dogs eyes out with my other hand.

[Sami]

I dont really like pitbulls myself.


A kid in my neighborhood was mauled to death by one of them not too long ago.

[WarChild]

Originally posted by Sami
I dont really like pitbulls myself.


A kid in my neighborhood was mauled to death by one of them not too long ago.

Any dog of sufficient size can maul a dog to death.

With all due respect, I don't believe you either. Everybody always knowns somebody that knows someone who was killed by a Pittbull.

Unfortunetly, the numbers don't add up. Fatal Dog attacks are very rare.

"It is necessary to emphasize that a fatal dog attack is an exceptionally unusual event. Approximating 20 deaths per year in a dog population of 53 million yields an infinitesimal percent of the dog population (.0000004%) involved in a human fatality. "

http://www.fataldogattacks.com

[Sami]

Originally posted by WarChild
Any dog of sufficient size can maul a dog to death.

With all due respect, I don't believe you either. Everybody always knowns somebody that knows someone who was killed by a Pittbull.

Unfortunetly, the numbers don't add up. Fatal Dog attacks are very rare.

"It is necessary to emphasize that a fatal dog attack is an exceptionally unusual event. Approximating 20 deaths per year in a dog population of 53 million yields an infinitesimal percent of the dog population (.0000004%) involved in a human fatality. "

http://www.fataldogattacks.com

be my guest to ask anyone in the vancouver area.
It was all over the news

[Gynecologist]

That was an animal control officer.

[WarChild]

Originally posted by Sami
be my guest to ask anyone in the vancouver area.
It was all over the news

I live in the Vancouver area. Sorry, didn't hear about it.

This case may or may not have happened. But with some 20 fatal dog attacks per year in the US, and EVERYBODY knowing somebody who knows someone who was killed by a pittbull, the numbers don't add up.

Ask a Veternarian if Pittbulls are more likely to attack someone than any other breed of dog. My sister, a DVM in Vancouver, flat out told me no.

That's enough for me.

[galleryseek]

Originally posted by WarChild
You are 100% completely off base.

Read this site: http://www.fataldogattacks.com and get informed.

A Pittbull is no more likely to be aggressive by nature than any other breed of dog. Seriously, read the site. It will open your eyes.

so you're telling me under the same living conditions with that woman, ANY other breed of dog would have acted the same way?

if this is the case... then there still is a problem.

obviously dogs like pitt bulls have a bad reputation, and i think many people agree they're pretty ugly... so the people who usually purchase these dogs are low class individuals up to no good, who probably don't have the slightest idea on how to properly train it.

so what do you do (if this is such a big problem that something has to be done)?

do you make mandatory training classes?

or do you ban them?

[crockett]

Originally posted by WarChild
You are 100% completely off base.

Read this site: http://www.fataldogattacks.com and get informed.

A Pittbull is no more likely to be aggressive by nature than any other breed of dog. Seriously, read the site. It will open your eyes.

dude you can post all the links in the world but the simple fact is most of the people that get that kind of dog do so because of their aggressive nature. How many homeboys or rednecks would be happy with a basset hound or a golden retriever not many.

It's a simple fact that pit bulls, German Shepard's and Dobermans are far more naturally aggressive.

[WarChild]

Originally posted by galleryseek
so you're telling me under the same living conditions with that woman, ANY other breed of dog would have acted the same way?

if this is the case... then there still is a problem.

obviously dogs like pitt bulls have a bad reputation, and i think many people agree they're pretty ugly... so the people who usually purchase these dogs are low class individuals up to no good, who probably don't have the slightest idea on how to properly train it.

so what do you do (if this is such a big problem that something has to be done)?

do you make mandatory training classes?

or do you ban them?

Good questions!

Let me quote a bit of the site I keep trying to get you to check out.

THE BREED FACTOR
Many communities and cities believe that the solution to prevent severe and fatal dog attacks is to label, restrict or ban certain breeds of dogs as potentially dangerous. If the breed of dog was the primary or sole determining factor in a fatal dog attack, it would necessarily stand to reason that since there are literally millions of Rottweilers, Pit Bulls and German Shepherd Dogs in the United States, there would have to be countless more than an approximate 20 human fatalities per year.

Since only an infinitesimal number of any breed is implicated in a human fatality, it is not only unreasonable to characterize this as a specific breed behavior by which judge an entire population of dogs, it also does little to prevent fatal or severe dog attacks as the real causes and events that contribute to a fatal attack are masked by the issue of breed and not seriously addressed.

The problem is, that if you ban pittbulls .. These sorts of people that are using these dogs to be thugs, will just select another breed.

The problem we have to deal with is the idiotic owners. Start holding some of these owners accountable for "murder" and maybe it will change their mind.

[WarChild]

Originally posted by crockett
It's a simple fact that pit bulls, German Shepard's and Dobermans are far more naturally aggressive.

100% wrong. My source is a Doctor of Veterinary Medcine. What's yours?

[crockett]

Originally posted by WarChild
100% wrong. My source is a Doctor of Veterinary Medcine. What's yours?

experance

[WarChild]

Originally posted by crockett
experance

I think what your experience is telling you, is that bad dog owners often select these types of dogs.

Examination of newspaper archival records dating back to the 1950?s and 1960?s reveal the same types of severe and fatal attacks occurring then as today. The only difference is the breed of dog responsible for these events. A random study of 74 severe and fatal attacks reported in the Evening Bulletin (Philadelphia, PA) from 1964-1968, show no severe or fatal attacks by Rottweilers and only one attack attributed to a Pit-Bull-type dog. The dogs involved in most of these incidents were the breeds that were popular at the time.

[TheSenator]

My pit is trained hardcored.

I never leave my pit alone with the kids. I wouldn't leave any dog alone with my kids. It is just a rule.

Other than that he is just a normal dog that loves to play ball and hump the side of the couch.

[SmokeyTheBear]

black people kill 1000 times more people every year , maybe they should ban the black people breed. Far too dangerous..

[molotov]

I have a fucking pit bull it was given to me thats why i took it,
the fucker is 5 months old, but it never listens, not long ago it kill a poor cat basically it destroy it and left it in my front door.

The only good thing about it is that its very playful, other than that it destroys everything.

I don't know what to do, im probably going to give it away or something,
The dog is a pain in the ass

[jade_dragon]

1st of all the pitt is on the agressive animal list.... but you wanna know what else is.

No suprise: Rottweilder and Doberman but guess who else and it tickles me pink. German Shepards and Akitas. A german shepard is way more dangerous to an adult than a pitt bull.

1 they are smarter
2 they are faster
3 they are MUCH heavier.

That pitt weighed all of 45 pounds, the reason the police do not use them is because they are WAY to light to stop an agressor. The pittbull is actually a loose term, most of the ones you are familiar with are mastiff/terrier mixes and they are not agressive as much as they are hyper protective. If the owner is not in danger and is calm the dog is fine, if the owner is endangered the dog WILL defend the house and owner as well as all within with its life and that is the point of the dog.

That dog attacked because it was protecting its owner from an assailant, the dog does not know what a badge or authority is, it only knows my owner is upset by this person, that person must go. Pitts are only deadly to kids and the elderly, but only pitts, rotts and dobermans make the news. I have had 3 pitts and I am no thug or gangster. The dog is the epitomy of a protector and backs down from no one, that I admire in anything that is alive.
None of my dogs were trained to be overtly agressive but they were very protective of myself and my property but I would not say any more than a german shep.

[jade_dragon]

Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
black people kill 1000 times more people every year , maybe they should ban the black people breed. Far too dangerous..

Humn.... ask jews, indians both american and asian, arabs and africans about whites and the death and destruction they have caused over the centuries. But then again the those indians did kill settlers hunh. Oh and wait arabs have been killing since the beginning of time and have been doing a lot more recently. Oh shit, looks like all mankind needs to be killed of also, you had a great idea, you just didn't go all the way

[Bas]

'They' say a dog is a reflection of it's owner...

(Something like Jake and the Fatman...)

[Pornopat]

Oh my...if people keep a dog they can not control all should be shot.

[beemk]

it cant be the dogs fault because its a pitbull, the dog owner looked like a nice responsible person that takes good care of her dog.

[BrainDead]

those dogs should be killed! really scary...

[mufas]

dog

[CamChicks]

Originally posted by galleryseek
what the fucking shit is the need for such a dog? they're naturally aggressive, right? i dont know shit about dogs

Right, you don't know shit about dogs.

I bet you can't even identify a "pitbull" if you saw one.

Want to try?
http://www.pitbullsontheweb.com/petbull/findpit.html

Pitbulls were bred to fight other dogs. Human trainers had to be able to set inbetween two fighting dogs and seperate them without getting bit himself. ANY fighting dog that was agressive towards humans would be culled (killed). This history makes "pitbulls" one of the most human friendly breeds and the least likely to attack a human. The 'killer pitbull' myth is something created by the media in the last couple decades. There was once a pitbull living in the White House. They were, not too long ago, considered great family pets. But then their historical image as 'fighters' was sold to wannabe toughguys as a penis enhancer. Ghetto assholes abuse them and idiots blame the dog instead of the owner who deliberately set out to create a monster by keeping it chained up alone 24/7, having their friends beat it with sticks, and feeding it gunpowder.

[WarChild]

Originally posted by BrainDead
those dogs should be killed! really scary...

Some children grow up to be drunks. Some drunks kill people in cars.

Cars and children should be killed!

[dig420]

Originally posted by jade_dragon
1st of all the pitt is on the agressive animal list.... but you wanna know what else is.

No suprise: Rottweilder and Doberman but guess who else and it tickles me pink. German Shepards and Akitas. A german shepard is way more dangerous to an adult than a pitt bull.

1 they are smarter
2 they are faster
3 they are MUCH heavier.

That pitt weighed all of 45 pounds, the reason the police do not use them is because they are WAY to light to stop an agressor. The pittbull is actually a loose term, most of the ones you are familiar with are mastiff/terrier mixes and they are not agressive as much as they are hyper protective. If the owner is not in danger and is calm the dog is fine, if the owner is endangered the dog WILL defend the house and owner as well as all within with its life and that is the point of the dog.

That dog attacked because it was protecting its owner from an assailant, the dog does not know what a badge or authority is, it only knows my owner is upset by this person, that person must go. Pitts are only deadly to kids and the elderly, but only pitts, rotts and dobermans make the news. I have had 3 pitts and I am no thug or gangster. The dog is the epitomy of a protector and backs down from no one, that I admire in anything that is alive.
None of my dogs were trained to be overtly agressive but they were very protective of myself and my property but I would not say any more than a german shep.

Hit a German Shep upside the head with something heavy and it'll run. Hit a Pit with something heavy and it'll try twice as hard to kill you. A Pit can easily bring a man down and take him out. A Pit is deadly to anything it attacks. The reason they're not used for police and protective work is because they can very reliably be trained to attack, but they won't reliably come off the attack on command.

That said, Pits are no more vicious than any other breed and are considerably more naturally people friendly than many other big breeds. The only problem with the Pit is the gangsters who want tough dogs and abuse them to make them crazy and Rednecks who breed them in their back yard.

[polish_aristocrat]

Originally posted by Sami
Anyone seen this?

http://www.assustador.com.br/videos10/acidentes/18.mpg

It looks like a cop getting attacked by a pitbull.


Not much of gore to warn about, but it is some scary shit!

Doesn't load for me, Real Player says it needs an update to play that file, but cannot find that update.

[RedShoe]

Originally posted by CamChicks
Right, you don't know shit about dogs.

I bet you can't even identify a "pitbull" if you saw one.

Want to try?
http://www.pitbullsontheweb.com/petbull/findpit.html

Pitbulls were bred to fight other dogs. Human trainers had to be able to set inbetween two fighting dogs and seperate them without getting bit himself. ANY fighting dog that was agressive towards humans would be culled (killed). This history makes "pitbulls" one of the most human friendly breeds and the least likely to attack a human. The 'killer pitbull' myth is something created by the media in the last couple decades. There was once a pitbull living in the White House. They were, not too long ago, considered great family pets. But then their historical image as 'fighters' was sold to wannabe toughguys as a penis enhancer. Ghetto assholes abuse them and idiots blame the dog instead of the owner who deliberately set out to create a monster by keeping it chained up alone 24/7, having their friends beat it with sticks, and feeding it gunpowder.

Nailed it first guess.

The weird thing is... Everyone points the finger at these dogs because it's what the gang bangers and shit eating hillbillys use as 'protection' (fucking idiots)

When I was a kid we had a dog that's bred SPECIFICALLY for hunting lions. They are all over the US and no one EVER mentions them. I bet less than half the people here even know what kind of dog it is. These dogs hunt lions... HUNT LIONS. That would be like owning a fish that hunts sharks.

I hope they never get the same bad reputation as the pit bulls do.

[notjoe]

Originally posted by WarChild
But outlawing the breed of dog is not the answer.

When Thugs can't get pittbulls, they'll move to another breed. A German Sheppard is just as likely to attack a person as a pittbull. You don't hear cries for outlawing them.

Sheppards dont have locking jaws


*EDIT* But i do agree that the dog is an extension of the person and a reflection of how the dog was cared for by the person.

Animals are really the only ones who will give you unconditional love

Pits are good dogs. The owners are the ones responsible, just like parents are responsible for kids that act like idiots. The person in the vid branded a metal stick at the dog...Why wouldn't it think it was under attack?

[CET]

That's are what boots are for. If that dog wants to eat something, feed him your boot.

[CET]

Originally posted by shermsshack
Pits are good dogs. The owners are the ones responsible, just like parents are responsible for kids that act like idiots. The person in the vid branded a metal stick at the dog...Why wouldn't it think it was under attack?

That was after the fact. The victim wasn't holding anything.

[WarChild]

Originally posted by notjoe
Sheppards dont have locking jaws


*EDIT* But i do agree that the dog is an extension of the person and a reflection of how the dog was cared for by the person.

Animals are really the only ones who will give you unconditional love

Locking jaw isn't all that relevant. Any large dog can do damage to a person, no problem. A 150 pound Rottweiler without a locking jaw could still tear even a grown man apart, if it's so inclined.

Get rid of the pittbulls, and the morons will move on to Rottweilers, Doberman and Sheppards. All of which could be very dangerous.

[WarChild]

Originally posted by CET
That's are what boots are for. If that dog wants to eat something, feed him your boot.

Most people that think they will be able to feed their boot to a large dog has never faced an angry one.

There's a guy in Florida that trains police animals in the German attack method (forget the name and could never spell it anyway). He used to have an open challenge to anyone that wanted to get padded up and try one of his Sheppards. You would be allowed to use any method you wanted to try and stop the dog.

One guy, armed with some grappling martial arts and basic animal anatomy figured he would be able to grab the dog's front legs while it lunged at him and spread them apart. If you were able to do this with enough force it should split a dog's rib cage. Needless to say he wasn't succesful. Never got ahold of the dogs paws once.

Anyways I'm rambling now.

[DarkJedi]

fuck dogs.

[Ross]

A pitbull tried to attack my Labrador 3 months ago when he was just a baby. I kicked it in the head. Guess I'm lucky it didn't take my foot off.

[mardigras]

Originally posted by DarkJedi
fuck dogs.

Often?

[NinjaSteve]

Originally posted by WarChild
It's not the dog that's dangerous. It's the dog's owner.with your car. The same applies to dogs.

That's like saying a tiger isn't dangerous, it's the owner. Time and time again pitbullls have attacked even under nice conditions. It's still wild within and built like a killing machine.

[jimmyf]

that's old old, saw it years ago on TV

[gangbangjoe]

holy shit
this was scary

poor woman