Very well said :thumbsup

I agree

I Agree.

:321GFY

What a fucking hyprocrite you are.

Anytime a Kerry supporter says something you disagree wit you tell them to shut up. Who the fuck are you to use the 1st ammendment against anybody?

republicans only believe in the Freedom of experssion as long as it suites them, any time someone says something they disagree with they try as hard as they can to shut them the fuck up.

And yes we should bring up that all the Republicans on this board agreed it was ok to fire a poor old lady for choosing to vote for Kerry.

Heres a clue for you, The daddy is a fucking idiot and irresponsible for marching his 3 year old daughter into a Kerry rally to use her as a shield.
Whoever in the crowd that actually grabbed the sign is a fucking prick for doing it.

The people who were yelling at the father were probebly yelling what a moron he was to use his daughter as a protest tool.

So fuck both of them.

Id be embarrassed to have to believe this about my side.

Yes, 13 points up in the poll and we stage this. hahaha, buy a clue.

you can almost never have a group of liberal protesters without assualts and arrests. kinda displays what they are.

dear rabble, go find a post where I've every told somone with a different viewpoint to "shut up"

you got a link to that?
post it and then point out *my* post.

dear rabble, here in America, a 3ry old should be safe holding a sign.
perhaps the father was exposing his daughter to the political process and explaining how its ok to peacefully disagree with someone.

What she learned was that liberal rabble are dangerous.

Ok Dad, time to put down the girl and start kickin' ass an takin names...

So, by the logic of the people posting on this thread.....then it is OK for Bush supporters to assault a person carrying a Kerry sign?


Sorry..... I don't get it at all. You guys must not think of freedom of speech the same way I do:2 cents:

Can't comment without knowing the whole story. not even gonna try to read something in to it.

They say porn is bad, maybe there should be AVS for politics?

Same thing could of happened at a baseball game. The little girl had a Cardnials cap on at a Cubs game. So somebody throws a beer at her.

Please point me to any legit source that says she was holding the sign.

I placed the laughing emotican with that comment to indicate I was joking. I doubt the action I suggested transpired.

Unfortunately I don't see many liberal protests to view for myself the amount of assaults and arrests. This due to the fact that the Republicans will not allow protests and instead designate areas many miles away from any events.

Yes right to protest but waaaaaaaaay over here in the corner where no one can hear you.

50

Who cares who was holding the sign? At what age is it ok to assault someone and destroy their property because you disagree with their politics?

what's your point?
are you excusing these scumbags at the ball game or the ones at the airport?

Interesting...... Are you referring the Democratic National convention? The one in Boston where they kept the supporter locked up in big cages? Are those the "republicans" that you are referring to?

Just wondering...

you obviously missed the DNC and the fenced in, tarped over area for the protesters showing up there. :Oh crap

that's exactly what the sign tearer was thinkin as well.

i'm from canaduh, and we even watch in hopeless disbelief that bush actually has people who support his totally moronic ass.

No I am refering to the designated protest zones that are in place anytime Bush is in town.

If someone is violent or starting a riot they should be locked in cages regardless of the party they support.

I'm excusing neither. My point speaks to society in America today. Thought that was obvious?

So I guess you would assault Bush supporters in order to impose your opinion on them?

hmmmmm..... I guess that National Sociolism isn't dead after all...

guess she never served in Vietnam

liberals are well known for their violent protests, conservatives are not.

(think WTO protests, they aren't conservatives or republicans)

the violent rabble need to be kept away from the president. I understand this seems new to you but the facts are, there was never a need to protect clinton from conservative protesters. this liberal rabble needs to be kept far away from Bush.

The protesters in Boston were not violent. The Democrats had the cages set up before the protesters got there, they kept ALL of them inside of the cages.

When Clinton was president, protestors were kept away from him also.......they ALWAYS are kept back from sitting presidents for security reasons. ALL presidents.

what was obvious is your lack of condemnation of the assault on a 3yr old.

Do dems were forced to remove a pro-kerry T-shirt, arrested and handcuffed at a Rep gathering.
That never and will never happen .... :1orglaugh

Your sig says it all, "I'm the brick wall"

quote 12clicks current sig:
"I'm the brick wall morons bang their head against"

So call me the moron and lets moveon.org

Protecting a president is one thing. Making it so a protester can not be heard is another. I wasnt at the DNC in Boston so I don't know the location of this protected area that protesters were put in but I do know Bush is famous for making it impossible for protestors to be heard above and beyond security.

We're all someones children.

In related news, A woman was arrested for heckling laura bush today.

:glugglug

he is mainly concerned about " been shown ".

You NEVER see a protester or a protest sign.
You do see unanimous cheering people and mostly you see him waving constantly ( coming down from the plane ) to a possible crowd. But I think there is nobody when he waves as such, otherwise a shot of the crowd would be done on the spot.

How about at the point someone shoves it in their face. If you were to shove a sign in my face you'd be lucky if that's all that got tore up.:glugglug

In this day and age....if Kerry wins, you will see the same kind of security around him.

Where did you see that it was shoved in anyones face? They were standing at a fence...facing the fence. How could they "shove it in their face"?

BTW, this happened to me at an anti-war rally in Miami. I came with a sign that was for the war, and people were grabbing at it, trying to pull it down..... the only difference was that I'm 6'4" and I held it out of their hands....and pushed back at the people that were pushing at me, but I've seen firsthand how anti-bush protesters act towards people that don't agree with them.:2 cents:

That was the point of a couple of my previous posts. We have no clue what happened. The original poster embellished the story that the girl was holding the sign and that it was thrown back at her while people cheered.

Besides not being able to find any legit source that supports that, we are left with a pic that suggests that after whatever happened her dad stood there calmly and posed for a pic while she cried while pushing a piece of a sign in her hand.

A picture may be worth 1000 words, but you can attatch 1000 words to any pic.:2 cents:

This story is useless without video.

father is guilty of child endangerment

Almost as bad as dangling a baby out a window:glugglug

Actually, I heard the father interviewed this morning on the radio. He was holding a sign, and so was his daughter. They were both taken, and, as far as "posed for a pic", the father says that he turned around and left as soon as it happened. When someone takes a pic in the middle of the action, the action is frozen.... This was obviously a moment after the thug in the green hat had grabbed the sign, the father still has to take several seconds to assess the situation, and turn around and get out of there......"calmly stood for a pic"? Give me a break!

I don't see how ANY person that grabs ANYONE ELSE'S sign because they don't agree with them is justified. That just seems common sense to me.....NO MATTER WHICH SIDE OF THE FENCE YOUR ON

....and the people that assaulted them are guily of what? Nothing? I don't see your point at all... Don't you think that the other people were wrong? I bet if it was your child, or baby sister, or whatever, YOU would be kicking some ass out there.

It's pretty clear you don't have kids. A three year old has a "traumatic situation" on average of once per hour.

please don't make laugh :1orglaugh

That's not nice.