GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Violent John Kerry supporters attack a 3 year old girl (pic) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=357893)

woj 09-17-2004 08:26 AM

50

sperbonzo 09-17-2004 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by mardigras
Please point me to any legit source that says she was holding the sign.
Who cares who was holding the sign? At what age is it ok to assault someone and destroy their property because you disagree with their politics?

12clicks 09-17-2004 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by pussyluver
Can't comment without knowing the whole story. not even gonna try to read something in to it.

They say porn is bad, maybe there should be AVS for politics?

Same thing could of happened at a baseball game. The little girl had a Cardnials cap on at a Cubs game. So somebody throws a beer at her.

what's your point?
are you excusing these scumbags at the ball game or the ones at the airport?

sperbonzo 09-17-2004 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Male
I placed the laughing emotican with that comment to indicate I was joking. I doubt the action I suggested transpired.

Unfortunately I don't see many liberal protests to view for myself the amount of assaults and arrests. This due to the fact that the Republicans will not allow protests and instead designate areas many miles away from any events.

Yes right to protest but waaaaaaaaay over here in the corner where no one can hear you.


Interesting...... Are you referring the Democratic National convention? The one in Boston where they kept the supporter locked up in big cages? Are those the "republicans" that you are referring to?

Just wondering...

12clicks 09-17-2004 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Male
I placed the laughing emotican with that comment to indicate I was joking. I doubt the action I suggested transpired.

Unfortunately I don't see many liberal protests to view for myself the amount of assaults and arrests. This due to the fact that the Republicans will not allow protests and instead designate areas many miles away from any events.

Yes right to protest but waaaaaaaaay over here in the corner where no one can hear you.

you obviously missed the DNC and the fenced in, tarped over area for the protesters showing up there. :Oh crap

perverted and proud 09-17-2004 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Reak
kerry must win
that's exactly what the sign tearer was thinkin as well.

i'm from canaduh, and we even watch in hopeless disbelief that bush actually has people who support his totally moronic ass.

Furious_Male 09-17-2004 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sperbonzo
Interesting...... Are you referring the Democratic National convention? The one in Boston where they kept the supporter locked up in big cages? Are those the "republicans" that you are referring to?

Just wondering...

No I am refering to the designated protest zones that are in place anytime Bush is in town.

If someone is violent or starting a riot they should be locked in cages regardless of the party they support.

pussyluver 09-17-2004 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
what's your point?
are you excusing these scumbags at the ball game or the ones at the airport?

I'm excusing neither. My point speaks to society in America today. Thought that was obvious?

sperbonzo 09-17-2004 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by perverted and proud
that's exactly what the sign tearer was thinkin as well.

i'm from canaduh, and we even watch in hopeless disbelief that bush actually has people who support his totally moronic ass.

So I guess you would assault Bush supporters in order to impose your opinion on them?

hmmmmm..... I guess that National Sociolism isn't dead after all...

ColBigBalls 09-17-2004 08:37 AM

guess she never served in Vietnam

12clicks 09-17-2004 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Male
No I am refering to the designated protest zones that are in place anytime Bush is in town.

If someone is violent or starting a riot they should be locked in cages regardless of the party they support.

liberals are well known for their violent protests, conservatives are not.

(think WTO protests, they aren't conservatives or republicans)

the violent rabble need to be kept away from the president. I understand this seems new to you but the facts are, there was never a need to protect clinton from conservative protesters. this liberal rabble needs to be kept far away from Bush.

sperbonzo 09-17-2004 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Male
No I am refering to the designated protest zones that are in place anytime Bush is in town.

If someone is violent or starting a riot they should be locked in cages regardless of the party they support.

The protesters in Boston were not violent. The Democrats had the cages set up before the protesters got there, they kept ALL of them inside of the cages.

When Clinton was president, protestors were kept away from him also.......they ALWAYS are kept back from sitting presidents for security reasons. ALL presidents.

12clicks 09-17-2004 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by pussyluver
I'm excusing neither. My point speaks to society in America today. Thought that was obvious?
what was obvious is your lack of condemnation of the assault on a 3yr old.

ColBigBalls 09-17-2004 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sperbonzo

hmmmmm..... I guess that National Sociolism isn't dead after all...

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/.../rs-lgflag.gif

directfiesta 09-17-2004 08:41 AM

Do dems were forced to remove a pro-kerry T-shirt, arrested and handcuffed at a Rep gathering.
That never and will never happen .... :1orglaugh

pussyluver 09-17-2004 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
what was obvious is your lack of condemnation of the assault on a 3yr old.
Your sig says it all, "I'm the brick wall"

quote 12clicks current sig:
"I'm the brick wall morons bang their head against"

So call me the moron and lets moveon.org

Furious_Male 09-17-2004 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sperbonzo
The protesters in Boston were not violent. The Democrats had the cages set up before the protesters got there, they kept ALL of them inside of the cages.

When Clinton was president, protestors were kept away from him also.......they ALWAYS are kept back from sitting presidents for security reasons. ALL presidents.

Protecting a president is one thing. Making it so a protester can not be heard is another. I wasnt at the DNC in Boston so I don't know the location of this protected area that protesters were put in but I do know Bush is famous for making it impossible for protestors to be heard above and beyond security.

Tom_PMs 09-17-2004 09:00 AM

We're all someones children.

In related news, A woman was arrested for heckling laura bush today.

:glugglug

directfiesta 09-17-2004 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Male
Bush is famous for making it impossible for protestors to be heard above and beyond security.
he is mainly concerned about " been shown ".

You NEVER see a protester or a protest sign.
You do see unanimous cheering people and mostly you see him waving constantly ( coming down from the plane ) to a possible crowd. But I think there is nobody when he waves as such, otherwise a shot of the crowd would be done on the spot.

mardigras 09-17-2004 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sperbonzo
Who cares who was holding the sign? At what age is it ok to assault someone and destroy their property because you disagree with their politics?
How about at the point someone shoves it in their face. If you were to shove a sign in my face you'd be lucky if that's all that got tore up.:glugglug

sperbonzo 09-17-2004 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Male
Protecting a president is one thing. Making it so a protester can not be heard is another. I wasnt at the DNC in Boston so I don't know the location of this protected area that protesters were put in but I do know Bush is famous for making it impossible for protestors to be heard above and beyond security.
In this day and age....if Kerry wins, you will see the same kind of security around him.

Quote:

How about at the point someone shoves it in their face. If you were to shove a sign in my face you'd be lucky if that's all that got tore up.
Where did you see that it was shoved in anyones face? They were standing at a fence...facing the fence. How could they "shove it in their face"?

BTW, this happened to me at an anti-war rally in Miami. I came with a sign that was for the war, and people were grabbing at it, trying to pull it down..... the only difference was that I'm 6'4" and I held it out of their hands....and pushed back at the people that were pushing at me, but I've seen firsthand how anti-bush protesters act towards people that don't agree with them.:2 cents:

mardigras 09-17-2004 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sperbonzo
Where did you see that it was shoved in anyones face?
That was the point of a couple of my previous posts. We have no clue what happened. The original poster embellished the story that the girl was holding the sign and that it was thrown back at her while people cheered.

Besides not being able to find any legit source that supports that, we are left with a pic that suggests that after whatever happened her dad stood there calmly and posed for a pic while she cried while pushing a piece of a sign in her hand.

A picture may be worth 1000 words, but you can attatch 1000 words to any pic.:2 cents:

This story is useless without video.

M_M 09-17-2004 09:27 AM

father is guilty of child endangerment

mardigras 09-17-2004 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by M_M
father is guilty of child endangerment
Almost as bad as dangling a baby out a window:glugglug

sperbonzo 09-17-2004 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by mardigras
That was the point of a couple of my previous posts. We have no clue what happened. The original poster embellished the story that the girl was holding the sign and that it was thrown back at her while people cheered.

Besides not being able to find any legit source that supports that, we are left with a pic that suggests that after whatever happened her dad stood there calmly and posed for a pic while she cried while pushing a piece of a sign in her hand.

A picture may be worth 1000 words, but you can attatch 1000 words to any pic.:2 cents:

This story is useless without video.

Actually, I heard the father interviewed this morning on the radio. He was holding a sign, and so was his daughter. They were both taken, and, as far as "posed for a pic", the father says that he turned around and left as soon as it happened. When someone takes a pic in the middle of the action, the action is frozen.... This was obviously a moment after the thug in the green hat had grabbed the sign, the father still has to take several seconds to assess the situation, and turn around and get out of there......"calmly stood for a pic"? Give me a break!

I don't see how ANY person that grabs ANYONE ELSE'S sign because they don't agree with them is justified. That just seems common sense to me.....NO MATTER WHICH SIDE OF THE FENCE YOUR ON

sperbonzo 09-17-2004 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by M_M
father is guilty of child endangerment
....and the people that assaulted them are guily of what? Nothing? I don't see your point at all... Don't you think that the other people were wrong? I bet if it was your child, or baby sister, or whatever, YOU would be kicking some ass out there.

Rochard 09-17-2004 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog
That is fucked up shit. Argue all you will about whether or not the father should have his daughter there and whether or not he should have her holding the sign, but it's fucking disgusting that someone would put a 3 year old through a traumatic situation like that.

Whoever did it deserves a good ass kicking.

It's pretty clear you don't have kids. A three year old has a "traumatic situation" on average of once per hour.

crockett 09-17-2004 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick
idiot !!

so you are basically saying we cannot raise our kids the christian way ? since they did not shose for it ??

please don't make laugh :1orglaugh

foolio 09-17-2004 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Paul Waters
I think it is horrible that daddy is impposing his politics on someone too young to make an informed choice.

:feels-hot

EXACTLYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Y CORRECT

Giorgio_Xo 09-17-2004 09:56 AM

That's not nice.

zzgundamnzz 09-17-2004 10:16 AM

I bet if this was at a Bush rally you guys would be crucifying him for hating children already...

NoHassleSteve 09-17-2004 10:20 AM

These guys made some documentaries about what happens
when people from the "right" show up at "left" protests.

http://www.protestwarrior.com/

I would assume similar footage exists from the other perspective; I've just never seen it.
:helpme

BuggyG 09-17-2004 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fred Quimby
http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com...ds_wvrs103.jpg

Three-year-old Sophia Parlock cries while seated on the shoulders of her father, Phil Parlock, after having their Bush-Cheney sign torn up by Kerry-Edwards supporters, on Thursday, Sept. 16, 2004. The sign was then thrown back at the little girl while other Kerry supporters cheered.


it was ALL PLANNED PEOPLE!!!
Bush scarifaces your kids in rally's now
knows people are gonan act that way

that or Iam just losing it
eitehr way.. had to give my :2 cents:

now :321GFY

PornGeneral 09-17-2004 10:32 AM

Election year drama......

gothoes 09-17-2004 10:42 AM

lol, was she at a kerry edwards speech or something? if so that was dumb

12clicks 09-17-2004 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by pussyluver
Your sig says it all, "I'm the brick wall"

quote 12clicks current sig:
"I'm the brick wall morons bang their head against"

So call me the moron and lets moveon.org

Translation: I refuse to condemn the assault of a 3 yr old.

MandyBlake 09-17-2004 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sperbonzo
Who cares who was holding the sign? At what age is it ok to assault someone and destroy their property because you disagree with their politics?

Who cares? You see people that watch Fox too much forget the importance to find the truth. How do we know they were at a kerry rally? I dont see any kerry signs or shirts or buttons? How do we know she was the one that tore it up and was crying because she didnt want to be at the boring rally anymore. Also How can you and 12 clicks even have the balls to talk about freedom of speech. When it was a ok for a Boss to fire a worker over a Kerry bumper stick. The couple that was arrested on the 4 th of july for wearing anti bush t shirts at a bush rally. The woman that was arrested for asking the first lady why did my son die.

12clicks 09-17-2004 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Male
Protecting a president is one thing. Making it so a protester can not be heard is another. I wasnt at the DNC in Boston so I don't know the location of this protected area that protesters were put in but I do know Bush is famous for making it impossible for protestors to be heard above and beyond security.
just to expose your liberal bullshit, lets take this piece by piece.
Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Male
I wasnt at the DNC in Boston so I don't know the location of this protected area that protesters were put in
fair enough, you don't know because you weren't there.

Quote:

Originally posted by Furious_Male
I do know Bush is famous for making it impossible for protestors to be heard above and beyond security.
so you weren't there either but because Bush isn't your man, you'll believe what you'd like to.

typical liberal rabble.

Dead13 09-17-2004 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
Translation: I refuse to condemn the assault of a 3 yr old.
The assult has been condemed already asshat! Most people here have already said it was fucking wrong.

Now condemn the asshole that put his daughter in harms way.

I bet you won't :winkwink:

Its because you are a righ wing moron hypocrite :)

cypocrypt 09-17-2004 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Paul Waters
I think it is horrible that daddy is impposing his politics on someone too young to make an informed choice.

:feels-hot

great post :thumbsup

Dead13 09-17-2004 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MandyBlake
Who cares? You see people that watch Fox too much forget the importance to find the truth. How do we know they were at a kerry rally? I dont see any kerry signs or shirts or buttons? How do we know she was the one that tore it up and was crying because she didnt want to be at the boring rally anymore. Also How can you and 12 clicks even have the balls to talk about freedom of speech. When it was a ok for a Boss to fire a worker over a Kerry bumper stick. The couple that was arrested on the 4 th of july for wearing anti bush t shirts at a bush rally. The woman that was arrested for asking the first lady why did my son die.
:thumbsup

The voice of reason is always so soothing :)

12clicks 09-17-2004 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MandyBlake
Who cares? You see people that watch Fox too much forget the importance to find the truth. How do we know they were at a kerry rally? I dont see any kerry signs or shirts or buttons? How do we know she was the one that tore it up and was crying because she didnt want to be at the boring rally anymore.
luckily for you, you don't need your brains to make a living.
I know the facts because I hear the father interviewed.
I also clearly see the "IUPAI for Keryy Edwards" shirt on the scumbag to the left.

Quote:

Originally posted by MandyBlake
Also How can you and 12 clicks even have the balls to talk about freedom of speech. When it was a ok for a Boss to fire a worker over a Kerry bumper stick.
who said it was ok? me? grow up child. Business owners always need rabble for meanial tasks. I think he's wrong and foolish to fire her.
Quote:

Originally posted by MandyBlake
The couple that was arrested on the 4 th of july for wearing anti bush t shirts at a bush rally. The woman that was arrested for asking the first lady why did my son die.
There's no need to lie, honey. When you cause a disturbance near the president or first lady, you are arrested.
pretending that the couple "were only" wearing anti bush shirts and the woman was "only asking mrs. Bush" is a lie.

stop embarrassing yourself child.

Yo Adrian 09-17-2004 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
The bitch had it coming.
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh


Honestly I think it's the fathers fault for taking his daughter to an opposing candidates rally to taunt them.

Rob 09-17-2004 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fred Quimby
http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com...ds_wvrs103.jpg
You can clearly see the asshat on the left with some of the sign still crumbled in his hand. The same asshat that probably supports Kerry/Edwards because he knows that eventually his family is going to depend on welfare and food stamps. Fucking loser! :321GFY

And comparing a Bush supporter holding a sign at a Kerry rally to going into a Mosque holding a sign saying Muslims suck is just plain asinine!

directfiesta 09-17-2004 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Yo Adrian
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh


Honestly I think it's the fathers fault for taking his daughter to an opposing candidates rally to taunt them.

True...

Like here, for the Gay Pride Parade, I didn't bring my sign that said:

" You dipshit faggot little boy abusers "

A friend of mine said it could be perceived as provocation ... I think he was right ...

Dead13 09-17-2004 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
luckily for you, you don't need your brains to make a living.
I know the facts because I hear the father interviewed.
I also clearly see the "IUPAI for Keryy Edwards" shirt on the scumbag to the left.

There's no need to lie, honey. When you cause a disturbance near the president or first lady, you are arrested.
pretending that the couple "were only" wearing anti bush shirts and the woman was "only asking mrs. Bush" is a lie.

stop embarrassing yourself child.

Stop embarrasing yourself, self-righteous asshole.

You listened to an interview with the father? WOW! I bet everything he had to say was nothing but the truth :1orglaugh

And how the FUCK do you know anything that happened in ANY of these events? You just automatically assume everyting you make up in your mind is correct and what everyone else has seen in video footage is incorrect?


12clicks would have us all believe he is the almighty messiah seeing as how he seems to have the perfect handle on everything and he is right about everything and he seems to have also seen everything there is to see.

Your to easy to get at dude its like beating up a 3 year old :winkwink:

mardigras 09-17-2004 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sperbonzo
Actually, I heard the father interviewed this morning on the radio. He was holding a sign, and so was his daughter. They were both taken, and, as far as "posed for a pic", the father says that he turned around and left as soon as it happened. When someone takes a pic in the middle of the action, the action is frozen.... This was obviously a moment after the thug in the green hat had grabbed the sign, the father still has to take several seconds to assess the situation, and turn around and get out of there......"calmly stood for a pic"? Give me a break!

I don't see how ANY person that grabs ANYONE ELSE'S sign because they don't agree with them is justified. That just seems common sense to me.....NO MATTER WHICH SIDE OF THE FENCE YOUR ON

OK, so there was a thug in a green hat. This is why I was digging for details. The original post said "sign torn up by Kerry-Edwards supporters" which apparently boils down to 1 person who apparently behaved badly regardless of what if anything provoked him.

The original post went on to say "The sign was then thrown back at the little girl while other Kerry supporters cheered." If the father "left as soon as it happened" the picture doesn't support a bunch of people around cheering. I see mostly people that look unaware that something has happened or slightly aware/confused about what is happening. One guy right next to them is smiling toward the girl like he has said something to try to console her crying and a lady who doesn't appear to be cheering but shouting. She could be yawning or yelling at him for having the child in the middle of his dispute.

Again, I'm not condoning anyone's actions, I just wanted to sort out the story which apparently was obviously quite embellished by the original poster.

12clicks 09-17-2004 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Paul Waters
I think it is horrible that daddy is impposing his politics on someone too young to make an informed choice.

:feels-hot

why? its clear your father imposed his stupidity upon you before you could make an informed choice.

Gunni 09-17-2004 11:17 AM

Link? Video? Pics with the girl holding the sign? Did the sign even say anything pro Bush?

Maybe Daddy tore up the sign and pinched her on the leg...
Maybe the girl tore up the sign in a furious rage because she couldn't get any candy...

This thread is wothless :glugglug

Ironhorse 09-17-2004 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by uchase/webpry
... so was does that tell us, kerry supporters hate kids ??
With a deep passion. Kerry supporters are, in fact, even cannibalistic by nature.. she's lucky to be alive really, she looks like a very tasty morsel.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123