That's a myth, but I'm glad to know now what kind of people swallow it. Multi-national corporations tend to DONATE republican, because they know the conservatives will get on their knees and give them what they want for their money. Successful business owners are generally democrats.

You lack the basic principal's in rudimentary knowledge regarding Cause and effect.

Being a Republican business owner in Adult...
Thats like watching someone cut off there own face off with an ice pick on a video clip. All ya can do is watch and think what a fucken retard.

fals info? you mean russian intelligence warning of saddam planning attacks on the US or do you mean saddams use and ownership of chemical weapons, or the brittish intelligence about nuclear interest or the discovery of a hidden nuclear program or the UN intelligence stating tons of proscribed weapons unaccounted for?


its gotta suck being a leftist stooge who's only ability is to second guess what the don't have the balls to do.:1orglaugh

Sharon Bush told her, Bush's publicist was at the table and says that's what she said. A follow up call from Kelley's publisher to Bush confirmed it.

Unlike conservatives, most people have to fact-check and verify before they go public with accusations. It's called 'ethics'. Would be nice if conservatives would look into it.

How does it feel now that you know you got swindled into voting for an unsuccessful alcoholic crackhead for President? Still so proud of yourself?

nah, its more like watching the rabble get cut off the ass of the internet so that the business owners can clean up because, well........we're not the rabble.:1orglaugh

No, he means all the much much much more credible evidence that Hussein had NOTHING that was ignored while Bush pressured our intelligence services to come up with the results he wanted to see.

And most of the info you cite was already discredited TOTALLY before the crackhead put it before the American public. Or maybe you missed that whole Valerie Plame thing. I don't think Fox covered that very much.

LOTS of folks read the NY Times even if you don't click the link:thumbsup

A more appropriate analogy would be watching Ronnie cut off his nose to spite his face. Because God knows there is no amount of evidence of stupidity and incompetence on Bush's part that will cause a conservative to EVER admit he might have made an error in judgement.

you're a little slow, aren't you boy? "sharon" jeb's first wife who he successfully sued for slander. yep, there's a bitter source for you.:1orglaugh



:1orglaugh

ahahaha, only a deluded, broken down off his meds shut in would characterize the president of the US as a failure.

but hey, thats what makes you fun.:1orglaugh

I don't know who you're talking about, but it isn't me. Keep making the smiley faces though, they're the strongest part of your argument.

50

much more credible?
post it then genius. links, not more tin foil rantings.

wrong again silly. none of it was discredited. (well, as long as you don't call liberals giving an opinion as "discredited"):1orglaugh

you talking to me or the voices in your head?:1orglaugh
imagining I'm talking to someone other than you only fools you, not anyone else reading this.:1orglaugh

ahahaha, only a deluded, broken down off his meds shut in would characterize the president of the US as a failure.

Hello?

HAhahaha!
You goto be on meds to think that Bush has done well with his 4 years of destruction.

I would say he has done great being a complete uncompromising dick whom has single handedly wrecked our country.

Perfect. No US intelliegence mentioned so we could pass the buck on someone else when all of this became fantasy land.
It's not about balls, macho man. It's about discretion. As our former president said at the Democratic Convention, strength and wisdom are not opposing values. Obviously this is a concept you and your square headed cronies have failed to grasp.

Yes, we've got it all wrong. :1orglaugh

It's not my fault you don't read Ronnie, why don't you go look it up? Start with the NY Times, then go to CNN. It's public knowledge, not hard to find and it's been on all the major news outlets. Which you would know if you got your news from any other sources besides Rush Limbaugh and Fox 'News'.

I just wanted to repost this for fun. :1orglaugh

Let me see if I get this right. You're upset because George didn't show up for his Flight Physical? Really, that's all this "new" stuff is about.

Consider this: Missing the Flight Physical only removes him from flight status. Maybe you are unaware that, without a current Flight Physical, you can't legally fly. Ok, he's off flight status. What does that have to do with his "served honorably" position? Two different animals there.

While in Nam, I missed a physical and was removed from "liftship" flight status for about 3 weeks, until I could get another appointment. Does that make my service "dishonorable?"

Give me a fuckin' break. Or, just reload your pipe and wish on.

Translation: I've been exposed. let me switch to plan B and say he can't read

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh
poor deluded children.
life sucks, eh?

Translation: I'm not going to work that hard on your behalf to show you shit that's already been published all over the world. If you want to stay ignorant it's really not my problem, except that you vote. Then it becomes my problem, but it takes a certain mental flexibility to process information and change your mind, and if you had that mental prowess you wouldn't be a conservative in the first place.

so look it up yourself, lazy fuck.

ah yes, again, when pressed for proof, the liberal stooge bows out.:1orglaugh

Your childish namecalling is wearing thin and if you want to continue humping my posts and get a response you should consider slacking off on it:thumbsup

Let me spell this as clearly as I can.

What I said has nothing to do with "examples of AWOLs from the 70s who were discharged in the 70s". It was a statement of military policy.

The commanding officer that signs a military discharge will designate the discharge under one of many categories. There is completion of service, medical, hardship and "convenience to the government" amongst those that would be issued an Honorable Discharge certificate. The other certificates are "Under other than honorable" and "Bad conduct discharge". You have to have done something pretty bad to get a Bad Conduct discharge.

I know first-hand that favors are done when writing these discharges and also often the CO is compassionate when designating it because he knows the stigma attatched forever. If someone is unsuitable for military service but they aren't a criminal the CO could give them a "convenience to the government" designation which gets them out of the military's hair and they get their honorable discharge. I personally know of at least 2 of those given to people with addictions.

We may never know what really went on during George Bush's "service", but I've never heard of military people being able to toss off their obligations to go campaigning for political candidates so obviously someone was making special arrangements for him (not that there's anything wrong with that).... at any time any CO could have written him a "convenience to the government" HONORABLE Discharge... whether a favor or just to let go an unneeded/unwanted member and even if he had been a little "naughty".

yet again, when pressed to do some research, the conservative idiot flips on Fox News.

any length to spin a tale to call night day or black white or truth false.:1orglaugh

Damn. This thread got big while my internet went down.

Any length? I told you I know first-hand from my own military experience. If you'd like you may publicly call me a liar. That seems to be a popular thing for Republican sheep to do to people who actually served. BTW, what branch were you in?:glugglug

Hi Horse riders never see the blade that cuts the legs out from under em...

run away diglet, run away.:1orglaugh

http://www.nci.org/pr/pr21998.htm
The Nuclear Control Institute (NCI) warned today that contrary to the widespread belief that Iraq's nuclear weapons program no longer poses an immediate threat, evidence collected by United Nations inspectors in fact points to an active, advanced program that poses a clear and present danger.
In 1990, just prior to the Gulf War, NCI had warned that Iraq might be only weeks away from having a bomb because it could divert bomb-grade uranium fuel from its civilian research reactors between visits by IAEA inspectors. NCI's warning went unheeded at the time, only to be proven correct when Saddam's son-in-law defected in 1995 and disclosed he had ordered a "crash program" to produce a bomb by this means until allied bombing halted the effort.

http://www.phrusa.org/research/chemi...miraqgas2.html

soil samples taken from bomb craters near a Kurdish village in northern Iraq by a team of forensic scientists have been found to contain trace evidence of nerve gas.

this link is probably over your head but the smart ones will get it:
http://www.direct.gov.uk/Newsroom/Ne...956&chk=G9/Fci

go look at the report of multiple sources for the iraq niger connection. you'll see that intelligent men disregarded the forged documents and still concluded that iraq tried to buy uranium.

you have until tomorrow for a rebuttle with your leftist thoughts, nitwit. my day is over:1orglaugh

oh please, fool. the only sheep here are the people who buy into your 1000 word expalination of how someone can go awol and get a honorable discharge. keep drinking the koolaide, stooge.:1orglaugh

lol, I forgot.. When it comes to awarding medals in real combat, the military doesnt work. When it comes to sugar coating a pretty rich boy's record, it works just fine tyvm :Graucho

No it will not...it will be what is known as a general discharge and will say...if applicable...under honorable conditions. It is a totally different document than an Honorable Discharge.

So again, I ask you what branch you were in to know first hand?

If someone arranged for him to go campaigning instead of his normal duties why is it hard to believe they would write a "Convenience to the government" discharge for him? It's a matter of simple cleric paperwork. You act like it's an act of Congress or something.

12 clicks is like the herpes that only festers up around election time. The good thing is that after his anti-christ is either re-elected or taken out of office he will go away again for another 4 years as he has nothing to troll on about..

not like I will ever read this thread again, so you can save your breath from calling me a diglet, or any other new made up word you have, and don't worry I will go take my meds now..

I know for a fact that a CO can issue whatever documents he wants. Or at least it was still that way in '81.

A CO does not process any discharge..."Honorable Discharge"...or "general discharge" or any other type of discharge...and in addition a discharge is given primarily...if not totally...based upon your 201 file/jacket. A "general discharge" covers most dishcharges other than an "Honorable Discharge"...ie...a person can go AWOL and in lieu of a Courts Martial he can be given a "general discharge" which will literally state "less than honorable conditions". A person could be given a "general discharge"...for let us say...a "hardship" which will literally state "honorable conditions". An "Honorable Discharge" is a totally different document and is given when all contractual obligations have been honorably full filled...and your term of service is up. It would be interesting to know if President Bush actually received an "Honorable Discharge" or a "general discharge" under honorable conditions.

I thought this whole discussion was how GW could have gotten an Honorable Discharge. If he didn't I'll quit trying to post benefits of the doubt:glugglug

I personally do not know if he received an "Honorable Discharge" or a "general discharge" under honorable conditions...or if his proponents are aware of the distinction.

BTW I received more than one honorable discharge with my last discharge in '92 being a "general discharge" for medical reasons and under honorable conditions.