Will 2257 regs be retroactive to include all past content? Is that legal?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Daymare
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2002
    • 2674
    #1

    Will 2257 regs be retroactive to include all past content? Is that legal?

    IE: porn movies made in 1985 without passports, etc.


    Discuss.
    Tags: None
    • mardigras
      Bon temps!
      • Feb 2003
      • 14194
      #2
      Everyone's going to jail
      .

        Comment

        • tony299
          lurker
          • Aug 2002
          • 57021
          #3
          read the regs www.2257.com

            Comment

            • AaronM
              GFY Royality ;)
              • Oct 2001
              • 46923
              #4
              Originally posted by Daymare
              IE: porn movies made in 1985 without passports, etc.


              Discuss.

              Go read the proposed regs. They specifically address this issue.

                Comment

                • steve90
                  Confirmed User
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 2397
                  #5


                  GFY is no place for legal advice

                    Comment

                    • egonetworks
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 6706
                      #6
                      Originally posted by steve90

                      GFY is no place for legal advice

                        Comment

                        • Daymare
                          Confirmed User
                          • Feb 2002
                          • 2674
                          #7
                          Originally posted by AaronM
                          Go read the proposed regs. They specifically address this issue.
                          Ok, I read the info at 2257.com.

                          My next question is: if the new regulations go into effect, will all performers in the content shot from 1990 to present be required to have a passport as valid id? And if so, how is that possible/legal of the government to expect of us when that isn't what was required at the time it was shot. How can you make a law 'now' and punish people who did what was once the legal way to do it? It makes no sense to me if that's the case.

                          Any insight would be appreciated.

                            Comment

                            Previous template Next
                            Working...