Universities now in defiance of 2257. - GoFuckYourself.com

sexeducation · 09-03-2004, 04:47 PM

Well ...
It's time to start listing all the Universities and Educational websites that are not complying with 2257.

And there are tons ...

So much for keeping this an adult biz only issue.

Like I said we live in a sexual dark ages.

[email protected]

sexeducation · 09-03-2004, 05:05 PM

One person's fetish is another persons disgust.

All websites with pictures of breasts regardless of whether they are cancer/mamography related must now conform to 2257.

dirtyone · 09-03-2004, 05:11 PM

You paint great works of art and no one remembers.

You make beautiful music and no one cares.

You post kiddy porn one time and your a fucking pedo for life.

sexeducation · 09-03-2004, 05:12 PM

Every Doctor website in the United States must now conform to 2257 if THEY HAVE any amount of nudity on them.

It doesn't matter if they are pictures of "surgical procedures" or not - it sexual to some - obscene to others.

freeadultcontent · 09-03-2004, 05:13 PM

give me your login and pass.

btw you do not know shit about 2257

emmanuelle · 09-03-2004, 05:13 PM

um- since when are bare breasts "sexually explicit activity"?

reading comprehension is imperative

sexeducation · 09-03-2004, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by freeadultcontent
give me your login and pass.

btw you do not know shit about 2257

I'm pushing buttons ...
This 2257 issue has more chance of defeat if it's brought mainstream. I am brain storming online.

sexeducation · 09-03-2004, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by emmanuelle
um- since when are bare breasts "sexually explicit activity"?

reading comprehension is imperative

hmmm ...

Nobody is going to admit or help the adult industry about online porn - because we can't even talk about masturbation which most of the online porn is used for.

There must be a way to bring this mainstream.

freeadultcontent · 09-03-2004, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
I'm pushing buttons ...
This 2257 issue has more chance of defeat if it's brought mainstream. I am brain storming online.

mainstream does not care. Now give me your login info.

P.S. hollywood may, since they simulate it often.

You still are a no good for nothing person who can not live up to his word.

sexeducation · 09-03-2004, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by freeadultcontent
mainstream does not care. Now give me your login info.

P.S. hollywood may, since they simulate it often.

You still are a no good for nothing person who can not live up to his word.

No-one is going to admit they masturbate to online porn when most won't even talk about it.

Mainstream will care once we find the angle that brings the message home.

I hope I have a few people thinking about other angles.

emmanuelle · 09-03-2004, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
hmmm ...

Nobody is going to admit or help the adult industry about online porn - because we can't even talk about masturbation which most of the online porn is used for.

There must be a way to bring this mainstream.

So you think that the best way to represent the adult community is with lies & other falsehoods?

How about credibility & facts? If you're going to take it upon yourself to represent others, dont make us look like a bunch of illiterates who cannot read.

freeadultcontent · 09-03-2004, 05:38 PM

rob answered ya in other thread.

sexeducation · 09-03-2004, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by emmanuelle
So you think that the best way to represent the adult community is with lies & other falsehoods?

How about credibility & facts? If you're going to take it upon yourself to represent others, dont make us look like a bunch of illiterates who cannot read.

I told you I was brain storming online.

Say - what you disagree with instead of JUST saying you disagree.

emmanuelle · 09-03-2004, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
I told you I was brain storming online.

Say - what you disagree with instead of JUST saying you disagree.

OK- I DISAGREE with a pedo purporting to represent me, with propoganda and half truths, on an issue that does not affect him.

CLEAR ENOUGH?

sexeducation · 09-03-2004, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by emmanuelle
OK- I DISAGREE with a pedo purporting to represent me, with propoganda and half truths, on an issue that does not affect him.

CLEAR ENOUGH?

I am not representing YOU.
YOU have never answered on any board - whether or not you agree with the statement "There should be no aroused genitals or reproductive fluids on any directly accessed domain name."

I don't represent YOU or the Adult Industry - I represent the common sence of Parents that wish to discuss the sexuality of their teenagers in a modern way.

emmanuelle · 09-03-2004, 05:53 PM

WTF has that statement got to do with this thread?

Forget your lithium today?

You are a danger not only to society, but also to fringe communities such as ourselves.

You have absolutely no business calling yourself an educator, nor having anything to do with those under 18, whether online or in the real world.

As this board I'm sure is monitored by certain agencies, and is spidered by search engines; you put each and every one of us at risk of guilt by association.

Your very presence here hurts each & every one of us.

sexeducation · 09-03-2004, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by emmanuelle
WTF has that statement got to do with this thread?

Forget your lithium today?

You are a danger not only to society, but also to fringe communities such as ourselves.

You have absolutely no business calling yourself an educator,

I do not call myself an educator.
I promote intercourse.
Look it up - it means social discussion as well.

My slogons since inception as a general audience website ...
"Mom & Dad never had SOCIAL DISCISSION (intercourse)."

and my current one ..

Everything else - is just intercourse ...

proves this.

My job as the [email protected] regardless of the fact the website is constantly broken is to promote INTERCOURSE (push buttons).

I do a damn good job of it.
: )

Quote:

nor having anything to do with those under 18, whether online or in the real world.

As this board I'm sure is monitored by certain agencies, and is spidered by search engines; you put each and every one of us at risk of guilt by association.

Your very presence here hurts each & every one of us.

My presence only hurts those that constantly insult me without ever saying the specific reason of what they disagree with - like you.

Are Universities now in defiance of 2257 if they - for example - show "sexual positions" - that increase chances of pregnancy - that teach how to stimulate a woman's G-spot - for example?

ANSWER THE QUESTION !!!!

sexeducation · 09-03-2004, 06:09 PM

Good nite ...
we just got the Passion of Christ DVD ...
been wanting to watch it ...

CYA

mardigras · 09-03-2004, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Good nite ...
we just got the Passion of Christ DVD ...
been wanting to watch it ...

CYA

Got my copy today too. Hope you got the widescreen version, too much of this beautiful film would be lost on fullscreen pan and scan.

09-03-2004, 04:47 PM	#1
sexeducation So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Calgary - Alberta - Canada Posts: 7,315	Universities now in defiance of 2257. Well ... It's time to start listing all the Universities and Educational websites that are not complying with 2257. And there are tons ... So much for keeping this an adult biz only issue. Like I said we live in a sexual dark ages. [email protected]

09-03-2004, 05:13 PM	#5
freeadultcontent Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: "evitcepsrep ruoy egnahc" Posts: 9,976	give me your login and pass. btw you do not know shit about 2257 __________________ Exclusive Ethnic & Microniche Sites

09-03-2004, 05:38 PM	#12
freeadultcontent Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: "evitcepsrep ruoy egnahc" Posts: 9,976	rob answered ya in other thread. __________________ Exclusive Ethnic & Microniche Sites

09-03-2004, 05:05 PM	#2
sexeducation So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Calgary - Alberta - Canada Posts: 7,315	One person's fetish is another persons disgust. All websites with pictures of breasts regardless of whether they are cancer/mamography related must now conform to 2257.

09-03-2004, 05:11 PM	#3
dirtyone Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: God's Country (Georgia) Posts: 3,706	You paint great works of art and no one remembers. You make beautiful music and no one cares. You post kiddy porn one time and your a fucking pedo for life.

09-03-2004, 05:12 PM	#4
sexeducation So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Calgary - Alberta - Canada Posts: 7,315	Every Doctor website in the United States must now conform to 2257 if THEY HAVE any amount of nudity on them. It doesn't matter if they are pictures of "surgical procedures" or not - it sexual to some - obscene to others.

09-03-2004, 05:13 PM	#6
emmanuelle Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Oh Canada! Posts: 3,662	um- since when are bare breasts "sexually explicit activity"? reading comprehension is imperative

09-03-2004, 05:53 PM	#16
emmanuelle Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Oh Canada! Posts: 3,662	WTF has that statement got to do with this thread? Forget your lithium today? You are a danger not only to society, but also to fringe communities such as ourselves. You have absolutely no business calling yourself an educator, nor having anything to do with those under 18, whether online or in the real world. As this board I'm sure is monitored by certain agencies, and is spidered by search engines; you put each and every one of us at risk of guilt by association. Your very presence here hurts each & every one of us.

09-03-2004, 06:09 PM	#18
sexeducation So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Calgary - Alberta - Canada Posts: 7,315	Good nite ... we just got the Passion of Christ DVD ... been wanting to watch it ... CYA