Monolith looks nice especially with the cms feature, but seems Lensman had a bad experience with them

We keep the base-design of NATS very clean just so you can easily adapt it to whatever you want. The system is 100% templated, you can change ANYTHING in the look of the system.

What exactly do you not like about the ad tools area, and which program are you basing this on?

Too bad nats doesn't cost more. Would have liked to see it priced higher so not everyone can afford it

I've got a client looking into affiliate software.

I recommended NATS because of what I heard. I haven't heard much about monolith, and this thread makes me wonder.... The NATS guys are all over here, and the programmer wrote a good comparison of the softwares... Where are the monolith guys with their response?

Thanks Sharky. One of the things I always stress to potential clients is that we are involved very closely with the industry so we know what people need and the trends that the industry is taking.

nice bump for my old thread

I think it's safe to say with any company you will have a different experience...some good / some bad.

I have been using Monolith for awhile and am very happy with it...As far as Fletcher of Monolith coming to the boards to post why you should use his script and not another companies...why?

You should do that yourself....findout what works best for your affiliate program instead of having someone sell you on their software.

I think both Monolith and NATS are very good companies and were there to answer questions I had.

Just my :2 cents:

We use River Styx on our smaller projects and programs

Pornkings is all built in-house and proprietary


River styx kicks ass

I don't think it's safe to say that. Find me someone who has had a bad experience with us. Please don't go posting that people have had bad experiences with us when you don't know a single person who has :) Thank you.

NATS

50 NATS rule

We use proudly use NATS!

http://www.evilgeniuscash.com

I think you took this the wrong way there pal...

relax

We paid for Monolith and abandoned it after they went unresponsive for weeks during the install process.

I couldn't be happier with NATS.

Cheers
-b

last i checked there was a shaving feature in that script

I'm relaxed. I just don't appreciate people saying there are parties who have had bad experiences with my company when in fact there aren't any. I'm sure you can understand that.

:thumbsup

I figured I'd chime in on this one. This was back in the spring and the setup was on Windows machines, using Microsoft SQL server. I notified the company from the beginning we'd never set it up on Windows before, or even tested it. It was designed for UNIX and MySQL. All that was ever paid was a $495 setup fee. I was on the phone everyday for weeks with you as well as your techs, so don't say we were unresponsive.

I was even on your machines through VPN trying to set it up with you guys. It was known Windows was unsupported from the beginning. If you still have any issues, feel free to contact me.

I've heard good things about NAT and I'm sure they have a great product. It's up to the person using the software to test both out and pick what fits your company best. If anyone wants to try out Monolith, feel free to talk to me and I'll get you a demo and even a live demo on your servers for no cost so you can see what it's like.

-Fletcher

A bump for John (NATS) :thumbsup