|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 224
|
Is this something to be worried about?
Hey everyone,
I need an opinion. I saw this post a few down the list about a new TGP. Take a look. http://www.pornhill.net And then look at mine. http://www.onlymovies.com/main.php Shit, if you add a table to the right side, it's my tgp...just different color. Nav bar almost the same (rollover), table style, etc. To pornhill, in no way am i slandering you one bit...and my apologies is this is coincidental. I'm just one of the few webmaster who actually did file copywrite portions of a tgp design, process of interaction and layout. Is this to close for comfort? What do you think? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,738
|
I don't see the connection, that roll over is pretty standard on many websites, and other than that I did not see where the 2 looked that much alike at all
![]() Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
HAL 9000
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 34,515
|
they look like a lot, but this layout is used my 100s sites,at least i have seen it in many sites, most of the non-adult ones. I don't think is related in anyway with yours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 224
|
Yeah... i dont think so either. I just imagine if i took away "girls eyes" between the nav bar and table on my site, they both would be pretty identical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 224
|
And yes...rollovers and the three/two table layout is pretty standard.
But, it's how the webmaster decides to "represent" the standard layout and be effective in his design, and to stand out that makes all the difference. That's what i was concern with....not the person used rollovers or tables. Any other opinions? [This message has been edited by Crutch (edited 05-24-2001).] |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 563
|
do you use CSS ? the other site does and is much faster if you switch your rollovers to CSS they look much better and load a lot faster.
just an FYI ------------------ Peace will come, just kill them all... |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 224
|
Yeah....i has the site in CSS to begin with, but i redid it. I use 4.2 netscape to design...so i know im compatible.
But thanks for the insight watcher...i didnt know css loaded js rollerovers faster..never noticed that before. ![]() Now back to my original question... This whole board and only 3 opinions? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,215
|
i wouldnt worry...but nice layout crutch
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 563
|
yes..
Cascading Style Sheets will be replacing some areas of HTML or all of it all together.. I have a few sites that are completly dont solely in CSS... =o) much faster and better. and WTF are you using netscape for? ------------------ Peace will come, just kill them all... |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 224
|
Thanks MrBrian.
![]() Watcher, i design using netscape cause more then 1/4 of population still havent update the browsers. I guess i don't want to miss out. ![]() By the way, i don't use Netscape, i just have it to test my sites compatibility. [This message has been edited by Crutch (edited 05-25-2001).] |
|
|
|