against the war in iraq?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • evanmorgan
    Confirmed User
    • Aug 2004
    • 2490

    #1

    against the war in iraq?

    so you think a bloke who does http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3738368.stm , should still be in charge?!
    Perfect for Asian, Petite,Teen, Exotic, Bikini, Solo girl, Panty, Softcore and Cameltoe Traffic

    100% Exclusive Girls and Content
  • TheLegacy
    SEO RobertWarrenSEO.com
    • Apr 2003
    • 18255

    #2
    I am assuming your asking whether Saddam Hussein should just bypass the legal system, and not waste anytime and just be shot?

    though there may be some truth to that, but your not using your head, he can give us more info, the families will need closure and will want to see him sweat a bit - he may also lead us to more locations that he can point fingers.

    you certainly wouldnt make a good mafia boss

    btw heres the link again

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/3738368.stm

    RobertWarrenSEO.com
    Telegram: @TheLegacy54

    Comment

    • skyechase
      Confirmed User
      • Aug 2004
      • 510

      #3
      No, I don't think he should be in charge. I didn't vote for him last election and will be voting for Kerry this election. Besides, his whole purpose and reason for going to war was because of Weapons of Mass Destruction which has yet to be found. And mind you, considering he talks about the global world and economy yet would go to war without the UN backing us. We look like monsters to most of the rest of the world because we have a gung ho cowboy for president. Have you ever looked to see what other countries supported us going to war? It's a joke!

      And your link wasn't directing it to the site. So here is the link that should work

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/3738368.stm
      Last edited by skyechase; 10-13-2004, 09:11 AM.


      Skye
      [email protected]
      ICQ: 246300603

      Comment

      • adhesive
        Registered User
        • May 2004
        • 49

        #4
        "US-led investigators have located nine trenches in Hatra containing hundreds of bodies believed to be Kurds killed during the repression of the 1980s."

        It's 2004, it was 2003 when the war started. Why the rush now? Oh yeah, it's convenient.
        Promote Fling on Huge Traffic
        Current June Statistics: 1:15 Free Joins & 1:53 Paid Joins!

        http://www.interracial-hardcore.net/

        Comment

        • evanmorgan
          Confirmed User
          • Aug 2004
          • 2490

          #5
          Originally posted by skyechase
          No, I don't think he should be in charge. I didn't vote for him last election and will be voting for Kerry this election. Besides, his whole purpose and reason for going to war was because of Weapons of Mass Destruction which has yet to be found. And mind you, considering he talks about the global world and economy yet would go to war without the UN backing us. We look like monsters to most of the rest of the world because we have a gung ho cowboy for president. Have you ever looked to see what other countries supported us going to war? It's a joke!

          And your link wasn't directing it to the site. So here is the link that should work

          http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/3738368.stm
          but you dont have someone who murders women and children and burys them in mass graves. I cant see how the war in iraq is a failure of bush, when hes managed to get rid of saddam.
          Perfect for Asian, Petite,Teen, Exotic, Bikini, Solo girl, Panty, Softcore and Cameltoe Traffic

          100% Exclusive Girls and Content

          Comment

          • sperbonzo
            I'd rather be on my boat.
            • May 2003
            • 9750

            #6
            Originally posted by skyechase
            No, I don't think he should be in charge. I didn't vote for him last election and will be voting for Kerry this election. Besides, his whole purpose and reason for going to war was because of Weapons of Mass Destruction which has yet to be found. And mind you, considering he talks about the global world and economy yet would go to war without the UN backing us. We look like monsters to most of the rest of the world because we have a gung ho cowboy for president. Have you ever looked to see what other countries supported us going to war? It's a joke!

            And your link wasn't directing it to the site. So here is the link that should work

            http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/3738368.stm
            The only reason that France and Germany bullied the rest of the EU into going against the US is that they were:

            1. Making Billions off of shady back door "oil for food" deals with Saddam Hussain

            2. Had a deal with Saddam to convert the trading units for oil from petrodollars to petroeuros.

            The European goverments were concerned with money that they were making from Iraq.... that's all.
            Last edited by sperbonzo; 10-13-2004, 09:15 AM.
            Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing

            [email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/

            ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperber

            Comment

            • psili
              Confirmed User
              • Apr 2003
              • 5526

              #7
              Originally posted by evanmorgan
              but you dont have someone who murders women and children and burys them in mass graves. I cant see how the war in iraq is a failure of bush, when hes managed to get rid of saddam.
              Bush started a war based on lies and because of this war there have been many dead women and children. What's the difference between the two ?
              Your post count means nothing.

              Comment

              • adhesive
                Registered User
                • May 2004
                • 49

                #8
                Originally posted by evanmorgan
                but you dont have someone who murders women and children and burys them in mass graves. I cant see how the war in iraq is a failure of bush, when hes managed to get rid of saddam.
                Inability to realize failure is a very, very bad thing. How much would it take? Civil war? Would it take more?
                Promote Fling on Huge Traffic
                Current June Statistics: 1:15 Free Joins & 1:53 Paid Joins!

                http://www.interracial-hardcore.net/

                Comment

                • sacX
                  Confirmed User
                  • Dec 2002
                  • 2998

                  #9
                  Originally posted by sperbonzo
                  The only reason that France and Germany bullied the rest of the EU into going against the US is that they were:

                  1. Making Billions off of shady back door "oil for food" deals with Saddam Hussain

                  2. Had a deal with Saddam to convert the trading units for oil from petrodollars to petroeuros.

                  The European goverments were concerned with money that they were making from Iraq.... that's all.
                  and what was in it for the hundred of other countries who were against it?
                  Have Asian Language Traffic?

                  Comment

                  • mardigras
                    Bon temps!
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 14194

                    #10
                    Originally posted by evanmorgan
                    but you dont have someone who murders women and children and burys them in mass graves. I cant see how the war in iraq is a failure of bush, when hes managed to get rid of saddam.
                    Saddam was boxed in and impotent at the launch of the war. There were numerous other pressing needs if we just had to go to war to right some of the world's wrongs. GW chose Iraq and basically in return for bringing Saddam to justice for 20 year old crimes we have a never ending quagmire insuring "insergents" for decades. Was it worth it? I'll give my answer to that question in a few years because under our current policies I feel the cost has just begun.
                    .

                    Comment

                    • sperbonzo
                      I'd rather be on my boat.
                      • May 2003
                      • 9750

                      #11
                      Originally posted by sacX
                      and what was in it for the hundred of other countries who were against it?
                      France, Germany, and Russia all had a vested interest in keeping Hussain in power. They used their postions on the UN security counsel and as major economic powers to bully less powerful countries. It happens all the time.
                      Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing

                      [email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/

                      ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperber

                      Comment

                      Working...