2257 records - GoFuckYourself.com

TimeStamp · 08-08-2004, 08:21 AM

When are sponsors going to start giving out 2257 records with content packages?

have any sponsors already started to do so ?

Paul Markham · 08-08-2004, 09:16 AM

You might find that most of them are not allowed to give out this information with the content.

Many content providers will have a clause in their licenses about giving out the models identity.

Paul Markham · 08-08-2004, 09:31 AM

Those relying on Sponsor content might find the future a bit tougher if this law gets through. Right up to the time when they see bought content works better, in a lot of cases.

Sarah_Jayne · 08-08-2004, 09:34 AM

i don't know why but I can't help to think people using less sponsor content is a good thing in the long run.

pxxx · 08-08-2004, 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
Those relying on Sponsor content might find the future a bit tougher if this law gets through. Right up to the time when they see bought content works better, in a lot of cases.

This is very true, it is just a matter of people thinking ahead of time and making their moves early, instead of shuffling when things go into affect.

TimeStamp · 08-08-2004, 10:02 AM

if the content is non explicit though you do not need 2257 records right?

Paul Markham · 08-08-2004, 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sarah_webinc
i don't know why but I can't help to think people using less sponsor content is a good thing in the long run.

The worse effect will be a few part timers will disappear and start buying memberships again.

Can't see it costing one single surfer to stop buying.

Sarah_Jayne · 08-08-2004, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
The worse effect will be a few part timers will disappear and start buying memberships again.

Can't see it costing one single surfer to stop buying.

the only time I have used sponsor content in the last three or so years has been if it is a very specific site that you aren't likely to be able to buy your own content to promote. Other than that I would rather buy.

TimeStamp · 08-08-2004, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sarah_webinc
the only time I have used sponsor content in the last three or so years has been if it is a very specific site that you aren't likely to be able to buy your own content to promote. Other than that I would rather buy.

i do a lot of single girl sites so i guess those types of sites are sol for gallery submissons

Sarah_Jayne · 08-08-2004, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TimeStamp
i do a lot of single girl sites so i guess those types of sites are sol for gallery submissons

yeah that is kind of the type of sites I was talking about. Those types you need pics of the actual models to use or if you are doing a niche where that site shoots pretty much the only content available.

If it is an amateur site run by one model (and her team) then I guess giving out the details would be less of a headache then a big program that doesn't have contact with the models.

Webmistress Pookie · 08-08-2004, 01:59 PM

so those of us who used a lot of sponsor content in the past would have to delete all their galleries that use such content and perhaps get blacklisted by several tgps and mgps because those galleries no longer exist. am i understanding this correctly?

NoCarrier · 08-08-2004, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TimeStamp
i do a lot of single girl sites so i guess those types of sites are sol for gallery submissons

Then use extremely softcore material. You'll be safe and you will get a better ratio in the long run.

NoCarrier · 08-08-2004, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Webmistress Pookie
so those of us who used a lot of sponsor content in the past would have to delete all their galleries that use such content and perhaps get blacklisted by several tgps and mgps because those galleries no longer exist. am i understanding this correctly?

If u don't have the information about that content, would you like risking to go to jail or getting blacklisted from a TGP that doesn't understand the situation?

freeadultcontent · 08-08-2004, 02:05 PM

no AarronM yet.

TimeStamp · 08-08-2004, 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier
Then use extremely softcore material. You'll be safe and you will get a better ratio in the long run.

under those new defintions of sexually explict i think enven katesplayground gallereis are considered sexually explicit and they dont even let you show nipples

08-08-2004, 08:21 AM	#1
TimeStamp Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 320	2257 records When are sponsors going to start giving out 2257 records with content packages? have any sponsors already started to do so ?

08-08-2004, 09:16 AM	#2
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	You might find that most of them are not allowed to give out this information with the content. Many content providers will have a clause in their licenses about giving out the models identity. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

08-08-2004, 09:31 AM	#3
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	Those relying on Sponsor content might find the future a bit tougher if this law gets through. Right up to the time when they see bought content works better, in a lot of cases. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

08-08-2004, 02:05 PM	#14
freeadultcontent Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: "evitcepsrep ruoy egnahc" Posts: 9,976	no AarronM yet. __________________ Exclusive Ethnic & Microniche Sites

08-08-2004, 09:34 AM	#4
Sarah_Jayne Now with more Jayne Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 40,077	i don't know why but I can't help to think people using less sponsor content is a good thing in the long run.

08-08-2004, 10:02 AM	#6
TimeStamp Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 320	if the content is non explicit though you do not need 2257 records right?

08-08-2004, 01:59 PM	#11
Webmistress Pookie Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: in front of the computer Posts: 243	so those of us who used a lot of sponsor content in the past would have to delete all their galleries that use such content and perhaps get blacklisted by several tgps and mgps because those galleries no longer exist. am i understanding this correctly?