![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 6
|
VB6 vs. VB.NET
How many of you have played with the beta version of Visual Studio.NET? Thoughts? What are your thoughts on M$ deciding to include more backward compatability for VB6 than they originally planned.
Will you be using .NET when it is released, or sticking to VB6, or both. Why? And what about C#? It looks to me like VB.NET is turning into a real language (and it looks like ASP+ KICKS ASS). What will the 90% of VB programmers who never used any of VB6's advanced features do now that they will have to know about inheritance and polymorphism? Stick with VB6, is my guess. [This message has been edited by JzWild (edited 05-19-2001).] |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,526
|
Last I check, You can't avoid the Objects very much in VB6 can you?
![]() ![]() Show me somethin that is not Object ... ![]() Ok, so now you answered your question. And if they don't they are not programmers... ------------------ wiZd0m Fortune Pussy Adult Links |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 27
|
VB.NET is going to have real OO features? Please give details. I'm tired of every moron who can use VStudio macros to generate database "apps" calling himself a programmer.
VB might become a real language if they added inheritance and real encapsulation. Is MS finally getting a clue? |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
As for encapsulation, that's one of those ideas like reciprocity or empathy; one is either born with it or not. Programmers who don't see the wisdom of hiding implementation are people who should be, oh, serving hamburgers or washing bottles .. not writing code. VB actually did more for encapsulation than C++. C++ doesn't require developers to think, but anyone writing an OCX for VB found himself unable to use global variable or turn him implementation inside out and let clients hook up to its guts. These people were dragged kicking and screaming into writing halfway-partitioned code. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Too old to care
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
|
Lensman is a hypocrite
The Revive Juicybone Now Coalition |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |