that is not a good seo, that is a wannabe seo

Heh, whatever.

Always ;)

Was lookin for a bad girl, not a bad dog. Ahmmm, guess ya gotta be good to be bad. There is something funny in there someplace.

Oh, It's cause you're from Indiana... went to Valpo

You can't do more beside having lots of content and links from PR strong content rich sites.And of course a SE friendly site structure.

Google bombing,crappy doorway pages and cloaking is not the way to go and google will kick your ass sooner or later.There aren't any secret seo technics that could get you a better rank.

bump

Aaron, what about SEOguru, Darren

My bad, he already posted and I missed the post. Sorry

the term "SEO" doesnt just apply to google. And if you think google is the only engine worth going for, please, keep thinking that way :winkwink:

no doubt . . .. .for free tips and tutorials, check out AdultSEM.com

Google/Yahoo/MSN

are there any other engines worth wasting time on ?

So please enlighten us on what an elite SEO practitioner would do. :glugglug

Those are the SE's worth specifically targetting.

thats what i said.

i was wondering if there was anything else worth spending time on.

No,but most people get the most traffic from google.Of course some other rules apply for yahoo,msn and alltheweb but it's mostly just a google mirror with different domain ranks but if you got google banned domains they'll still be there.Also the msn bot is often going crazy and really getting my server down which kinda pissed me off and made me think of excluding it.

I was saying that you are correct in your assumption that Google, Yahoo, MSN are the only SEs worth tragetting. There are no other SEs that can deliver enough traffic to make it worthwhile targetting them specifically. Though other worthwhile traffic sources include directories/linklists and pay-per-click SEs.

I wonder how many people have less than 90% traffic from google.

i have less then 3% traffic from google currently.

Dude, you're way behind the times. Yahoo has almost as many daily search queries as Google and you can expect MSN to start making major inroads into Google and Yahoo's market share in the not too distant future. The only people who are getting 90% of their SE traffic from Google are the ones that think Google is the only SE that matters.

brand0n I just mean search engine traffic.Google traffic should normally be over 95%.

holy christ
Full Services $3000/month + 20% of product/membership sales. 15% of all ad invoices not paid in advance

youve got to be fucking KIDDIN me

That's bullshit,you can't just optimise for google it'll automaticly get you a better yahoo and msn position.

Fact is that I get over 95% of the search engine traffic from google.And that doesn't mean you can't find my sites on the same or better position on yahoo or msn.

That's total nonsense :2 cents:

The only regular poster that knows the SE shit is swami

Groove yeah I know you want to hear that other SEs get you 20% or more traffic because every trendy wannabe tells you yahoo and msn are up and comming but that's bullshit.

Check the public awstats (and they don't get less traffic):

http://awstats.sourceforge.net/cgi-b...name=mainright

too bad MSN doesnt allow dult sites.
they filter porn keywords or something.

*yawn* hoooray for Darren

I think that's a bit flawed.

Any SEO that knows what they are doing would not divulge everything they know on paper, so then you don't have to pay him to do it for you.

Matt

i got top 2 position for a good keyword in google but somehow penalized at Yahoo

when i do a search for my url i cant find it.
wtf is up with that ?

It's something you did...

Matt

WiredGuy as well, but he's unavailable.

All that link tells me is that http://awstats.sourceforge.net/ gets most of its traffic from Google.com. So what? That will also be the case for a large number of other sites which are well optimised for Google, but poorly optimised for Yahoo.

According to Wordtracker.com, Google accounts for 112 million searches daily or 35% of total web searches. However it is closely followed by Yahoo which accounts for 95 million or 30% of total web searches.

But if you want to believe that Google owns over 95% of the market that's fine by me :glugglug

ya think ?

just goes to show what you know

Groove, just check your stats and tell me what you see.

Awstats isn't optimised for anything and there is no special optimisation difference that could do magic in yahoo but not in google, as I said before.

How should wordtracker know the real numbers,only yahoo can tell them.Yahoo is very popular in asia but not that popular in western countries.

Most normal western sites have over 90% google traffic.

20% of product/membership sales. 15% of all ad invoices not paid in advance


wtf ?
who came up with this stupid idea ?

Just buy some quality PR5+ hardlinks on related sites yourself instead of giving all your money to some SEOs who do the same,maybe even get your site google banned by "experimenting" but charge an arm and a leg.

OK johndoebob, here's another source:

http://searchenginewatch.com/img/040323-sm-pie.gif

http://searchenginewatch.com/searchd...le.php/3334881

This suggestion is nuts. How the fuck is PR going to help without appropriate onsite and offsite optimisation?

hello