|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
07-24-2004, 02:15 PM
|
#1 |
|
ICQ- five seven 0 2 5 5 0
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,747
|
2257 and Janet's Boob
So, I'm wondering, in the future when someone flashes on a major network (say it gets past the 5sec delay for whatever reason, etc)...would the network be required to have 2257 on those h00ters?
would it be considered sexual content? talk amoungst yourselves...
__________________
Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only. 
|
|
|
|
07-24-2004, 02:29 PM
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,882
|
I was actually more thinking that this new 2257 might effect the sites who have the Pam and Tommy videos and pics, or Paris Hilton. I don't believe there are actual models releases for Pam and Tommy's sex romp.
Celeb screen caps from movies (simulated sex??) Curious about how all this will be effected. |
|
|
|
|
07-24-2004, 02:30 PM
|
#3 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,064
|
yea, I'm curious too
__________________
|
|
|
|
