Website Fights Back At "Fahrenheit 911"

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Greg B
    So Fucking Banned
    • Jul 2001
    • 7014

    #1

    Website Fights Back At "Fahrenheit 911"

    http://fahrenheit_fact.blogspot.com/

    This website called 'Fahrenheit Fact' was put up to fight back at Michael Moore's facts in his film.

    It's worth a looksee.
  • Warden
    Confirmed User
    • Nov 2002
    • 2906

    #2
    Good read.
    AIM: ZeeRiddler
    ICQ: 128160005
    Warden's MS

    Comment

    • pudcat
      Confirmed User
      • Mar 2003
      • 1169

      #3
      Why are these websites which dispute the stuff moore says so fucking boring?

      If they actually made it interesting people might read them.
      SUBMIT YOUR BABE GALLERIES

      PROMOTE YOUR BLOG HERE

      always looking for hardlinks icq #207011694

      Thunder-Ball.net, good for hardlink exchanges

      Comment

      • nofx
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Nov 2002
        • 16826

        #4
        and if the movie was pro-bush you would have the other side doing the same thing, pointing out this and that. i think its all quite funny.

        i think people are scared by the truth.

        Often times I wonder why
        There's love and hate, theres live or die.
        When sickness comes I must decide:
        When feelings go, theres suicide.

        Comment

        • ADL Colin
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Feb 2001
          • 11929

          #5
          I swear, I think Michael Moore plays everything close to the line in his movies so people will spend hours debating each and every nuance. He's a genius. It's like when people used to buy Beatles Albums and then look for clues on the album covers and in the songs, even playing them backwards, for signs that Paul was dead. Michael Moore is the walrus.


          Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY!

          skype = "adultdatelink"

          Comment

          • ADL Colin
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Feb 2001
            • 11929

            #6
            Originally posted by pudcat
            Why are these websites which dispute the stuff moore says so fucking boring?

            If they actually made it interesting people might read them.
            What would make them more interesting? Screenshots?


            Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY!

            skype = "adultdatelink"

            Comment

            • woj
              <&(©¿©)&>
              • Jul 2002
              • 47880

              #7
              some interesting comments there
              Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000
              Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager
              Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

              Comment

              • theking
                Nice Kitty
                • Sep 2002
                • 21053

                #8
                As I stated in my critique of the film...Moore twisted facts and used innuendo to the point of making his film BS...or as stated by someone else...not a documentary but a Michael-mentary.
                When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                Comment

                • EviLGuY
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Apr 2003
                  • 12745

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Colin
                  What would make them more interesting? Screenshots?
                  Couldn't hurt..

                  I think Moore did a good job with the movie. He made a movie all Liberals will enjoy, and he also roped the die hard Republicans in.. since they feel they have to see it and "disprove" it.

                  It's fun watching the Republican's nitpick the little things and yet they all seem to steer away from the basic premise of the movie. That being, that Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11, and that that Bush botched the operation in Afghanistan, let him get away and then used it for an excuse to invade Iraq on extremely tenuous evidence at best.

                  Comment

                  • slackologist
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 2379

                    #10
                    Lots of maybe's and he said this, but she said that, Nearlys, Probablys, Possiblys and "according to so and so".
                    Not many actual "verifiable" facts either way there though.

                    It's funny how Moore can get people's backs up like this :-) He is genius. Fat ass genius, but genius nonetheless.

                    Comment

                    • hova
                      Traffillionaire
                      • Jan 2002
                      • 22430

                      #11
                      Interesting! Thanks for the link
                      http://traffillions.com/

                      Sign up and get lifetime revshare on your traffic

                      Comment

                      • jayeff
                        Confirmed User
                        • May 2001
                        • 2944

                        #12
                        Originally posted by theking
                        As I stated in my critique of the film...Moore twisted facts and used innuendo to the point of making his film BS...or as stated by someone else...not a documentary but a Michael-mentary.
                        Isn't that pretty much your approach to political "debate"?

                        Comment

                        • theking
                          Nice Kitty
                          • Sep 2002
                          • 21053

                          #13
                          Originally posted by jayeff
                          Isn't that pretty much your approach to political "debate"?
                          I do not engage in "debate"...so the answer to your question is no.
                          When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                          FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                          Comment

                          • EviLSuperstaR
                            Confirmed User
                            • May 2004
                            • 804

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Greg B
                            http://fahrenheit_fact.blogspot.com/

                            This website called 'Fahrenheit Fact' was put up to fight back at Michael Moore's facts in his film.

                            It's worth a looksee.
                            They fight like sissies

                            Comment

                            • creegan
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jun 2004
                              • 223

                              #15
                              i think it's awesome that moore made a movie looking into the events of the day. it is important to do. the problem is when you are totally misleading in movies like this and bowling, and present your film as a documentary. documentaries are based on fact, not conspiracy theories and speculation from f list authors. the vast majority, we're talking overwhelming majority, is going to just accept what they saw and run with it. there should be a disclaimer at the beginning of the film. nobody (the majority of the people who will see that film) seems to understand that moore has his own agenda in the same exact way bush has his.

                              at least with bush or kerry, if something is bullshit, there are thousands of news networks and newspapers to jump on it. moore isn't under the same light, and that is dangerous.

                              sorry to drudge on... but the same people who say bush botched enduring freedom are the same people who say he is a puppet to his cabinet. from a military standpoint, afghanistan was a lose / lose. however if a "proper" force HAD been amassed... well consider the implications had the opposition been given more time to prepare. in the same way we make mistakes in business, it was an important mistake to be made. subsequently, iraq was taken in two weeks. let's not forget that whether or not it was personal agenda, a tyrant was ousted.
                              gfy'ers remind me of the causeheads from pcu

                              Comment

                              • TheSenator
                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                • Feb 2003
                                • 13330

                                #16
                                facts = BUSH IS A LIAR
                                ISeekGirls.com since 2005

                                Comment

                                • JFK
                                  FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
                                  • Jan 2002
                                  • 67369

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by slackologist
                                  Lots of maybe's and he said this, but she said that, Nearlys, Probablys, Possiblys and "according to so and so".
                                  Not many actual "verifiable" facts either way there though.

                                  It's funny how Moore can get people's backs up like this :-) He is genius. Fat ass genius, but genius nonetheless.
                                  Geniuses come in all sizes, even fat ass

                                  FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
                                  For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

                                  Comment

                                  • jayeff
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • May 2001
                                    • 2944

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by theking
                                    I do not engage in "debate"...
                                    Just semantics...

                                    Comment

                                    Working...