Spider Man 2 sucked hairy balls. - GoFuckYourself.com

Paraskass · 07-02-2004, 10:10 PM

I was truly dissapointed.
It had NOTHING over #1, except maybe the mechanic arm animations.

It was such a slow movie.

Maybe #3 will be better.

pure energy · 07-02-2004, 10:15 PM

bllott · 07-02-2004, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Paraskass
I was truly dissapointed.
It had NOTHING over #1, except maybe the mechanic arm animations.

It was such a slow movie.

Maybe #3 will be better.

it will only get worse. R movies are starting to be bad that's maybe why all pg movies are shit. spiderman 2 especially.. it was way worse than the first one, in the first one at least the villian was half decent, flying around dropping bombs on innocent people.. this one doctor octopus was totally pg rated designed to keep all the little kids "safe". whatever tho, there will always be some die hard retards to go and see it just to be able totalk about it.. it's just one of those movies.. no matter how bad it gets poeple have to go and see it.

Persius · 07-02-2004, 10:25 PM

... i disagree i thoguht it was an interesting movie with character devolpement

yes the action was less and it seemed to go slower then the 1st

but i still enjoyed the movie and would see it again

Strife · 07-02-2004, 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bllott
it will only get worse. R movies are starting to be bad that's maybe why all pg movies are shit. spiderman 2 especially.. it was way worse than the first one, in the first one at least the villian was half decent, flying around dropping bombs on innocent people.. this one doctor octopus was totally pg rated designed to keep all the little kids "safe". whatever tho, there will always be some die hard retards to go and see it just to be able totalk about it.. it's just one of those movies.. no matter how bad it gets poeple have to go and see it.

Yeah that's why the movie gets a 94% fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes and average 8.4/10 rating on IMDB...no matter how good a movie is, there always going to be some haters.

bllott · 07-02-2004, 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Strife
Yeah that's why the movie gets a 94% fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes and average 8.4/10 rating on IMDB...no matter how good a movie is, there always going to be some haters.

i'm not a hater, i just can't stand the cheap melodramatic bullshit that flows out of movies these days.. everything is completely modified to fit the proper standards and as you're proving it's done to such an extent that the viewers don't even notice it anymore. they watch some rating nonsense and immediately think it's good because the rating says so..

07-02-2004, 10:15 PM	#2
pure energy Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 4,274	__________________ Click Here to get $42 a sale AND Get FREE MGP Coaching from WebmasterLabor.Com Sign up above then EMAIL info (( at )) webmasterlabor DOT com for your free 1 to 1 MGP coaching

07-02-2004, 10:10 PM	#1
Paraskass Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: QC Posts: 5,829	Spider Man 2 sucked hairy balls. I was truly dissapointed. It had NOTHING over #1, except maybe the mechanic arm animations. It was such a slow movie. Maybe #3 will be better. __________________

07-02-2004, 10:25 PM	#4
Persius Tap into MOBILE! Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Hollywood Posts: 11,779	... i disagree i thoguht it was an interesting movie with character devolpement yes the action was less and it seemed to go slower then the 1st but i still enjoyed the movie and would see it again