DVTimes

The US army has moved to recall nearly 6,000 former soldiers to active service to help maintain its force levels in Iraq and Afghanistan.
It has played down the move but this is the first sizeable call-up of the kind since the 1991 Gulf War and critics say it amounts to backdoor conscription.

The US has relied on volunteer armed forces since ending the draft three decades ago during the Vietnam War.

It has a pool of 111,000 ex-soldiers in its Individual Ready Reserve.

The BBC's Pentagon correspondent, Nick Childs, reports that the recall is a further sign of the strain on the army and is likely to provoke controversy.

'Nothing new'

There are currently about 140,000 US troops in Iraq, many more than the Pentagon had originally planned for at this stage.

As members of the IRR, the 5,600 former soldiers now being recalled have retired or otherwise left the military but still have a reserve obligation.

Unlike other reservists, however, they do not train or receive pay unless they are mobilised and probably did not expect ever to have to serve again, our correspondent says.

The US army defended the recall as "nothing new or unusual".

"It's a management tool which we've always had available to augment our forces when we need additional personnel in a time of war," said Lt Col Pamela Hart, an army spokeswoman at the Pentagon.

Unwritten agreement

The development, along with other recent Pentagon moves to stop many current soldiers from retiring, will add ammunition to those critics who say the Bush administration is attempting a backdoor draft.

Retired Army Col Andrew Bacevich, a Boston University international relations professor, said the recall suggested the army was too small for its current missions.

"These are people who used to be soldiers and no longer are," he was quoted as saying by Reuters news agency.

"The informal contract... is that I have volunteered for a certain period of time and once that time is up, then the choice returns to me to decide either to continue my service or to opt out.

"What the Bush administration is doing is just shredding that informal contract."

The national security adviser to the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry said the recall was proof of the Bush administration's failure to enlist foreign support in Iraq.

"The fact is that this involuntary call-up is a direct result of the Bush administration's diplomatic failure to get real international help in Iraq," said Rand Beers.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3852209.stm

__________________
The Affiliate Program

Webby

Mmmm... sad shit!!

Especially the fact that this is because of a total asshole who would normally be hanging outside a candy store in Texas dressed up as a cowboy and never having seen a cow.

theking

Nothing sad about it...it is SOP. The soldiers in question knew the obligation they were undertaking when they took the oath.

__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

Webby

theking:

I would expect no less from a second rate "non officer" of the US military. Fortunately your senior officers presumably had more sense.

AMADude

Fuck, draft is coming soon then.

__________________
No sig, just here to fuck around.

theking

I suppose your post makes sense to you.

__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

twistyneck

That oath obligates them to support and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic, right? If that is the case, then why haven't they arrested Bush? After all, they did take the oath.

Webby

theking:

It is written in English and contains two sentences - with punctuation, - did you not learn to read??