Way hot.

I would so bang her silly. :Graucho

decent looking.....I was expecting bigger tits, tho

and she's not very photogenic

:hitit

I think she looks really cute and natural - girl next door thing.
Don't go whoring her up with glamour make up and she'll do great. :2 cents:

:thumbsup

Lies, she looks older :2 cents:

very cute good luck with her

cute :Graucho

She has a bit of that "deer in the headlights" look to her, but I see some great potential.

Good luck with her.

I think shes adorable.

what a cutie:thumbsup

50 models

Nobody calls me a liar ....I mean unless he's some anonymous dickhead on GFY :)

loks pretty good, got any pics from the end of the shoot when you say she was doing better?

not bad :glugglug

She has a double chin.

Then again, so does Rachel Hunter.

I want to squeeze her boobies.

She does look pretty old.

she's cute, I'd poke her a couple of times.

Yeah... shes cute and she looks to be a fun girl also.

I personally like Ginger Jolie!:Graucho

Are you guys on CRACK?

In your infinite wisdom.....what EXACTLY is it about this 20 year old chick ....shot on a digital camera, with on camera flash and NO MAKEUP...that makes you think she is "old" ?

What? her FRECKLES?

How many "OLD" people have TITS (non-enhanced) like that?


Please enlighten me.

nice :thumbsup

she is ok.

She looks 19-20 to me, and she is quite cute, I'm with Matt there.

But man this boring style of photography with the same couch, & lack of any degree of improvement in the past 7 years -- even for the amateur style your try to represent -- you still got members signing up to your sites? :Graucho

Is she brand new, as in REALLY brand new...

- or -

Is she brand new as in the way Chantelle was brand new: "Since Donovan Phillips is from a really small market up in Chico, I'm going to claim Chantelle Fontaine was found by me when she was actually found by Donny and sent down to me" (Chantelle tells her "adult" background in her own words here ).

Which is it?

I guess my question is: how did you find THIS "brand new" girl? Did a photographer from a smaller market refer her to you, thereby causing you to assume that since she's "brand new" to the LA market she's a "brand new" model? Or did she decide one day that she'd pose naked and that Matt would be her first nude photographer?

"Boring" is 100% SUBJECTIVE.


Um....Im not shooting on a couch.

Improvement? so I can look like WHAT? The Glamour stuff YOUR "trying" to emulate? :1orglaugh


My photos are not TRYING to be "amateur" .
NO IMPROVEMENT in 7 years would by YOUR characterization = "AMATEUR"
DUH.

Oh, I forgot to comment on the girl. She's pretty nice.

HOT:thumbsup

Super cute..
Need to see the Ass!
:winkwink:

It wouldn't hurt to buy a few strobes and use a digital SLR. You'd still be able to shoot "amateur" style, but you'd make the model more 3D looking and much more attractive to members.

Brian taught me that a few years ago, and GOD DAMN, was he RIGHT!! Sales and rebills went through the roof with just a few minor changes, yet the amateur style wasn't sacrificed.

ya bro you are correct you are not shooting on a couch. she is standing infront of a RED sheet. what is this RED screen? nice job! she is a hottie I will give her two thumbs up :thumbsup :thumbsup but you do need to work on the lighting and location of this foxy girl.

ps. please note my use of capitalization on my post with the word RED. <---- oooops i did it again.

I actually feel SORRY for you....still BROODING over your relationship with Chantelle. If you want to get all the way into the details of ME, YOU and CHANTELLE on GFY.....which we hashed over on emails about a year ago.....LETS DO IT....

GO FOR IT.

As far as this model....a friend of mine went and found her, gave her to me....and this was her FIRST SHOOT.....so I'll put that out for ANYBODY to DISPROVE SOMEHOW.

SHOW ME THE PHOTOS!

Just wanting to see who's version of "first time model" you're using: Matt's - or - the rest of the world.

, how about that? Donovan is my boy and he is giving you tips, how about you take the constructive criticism and work with it? is it that hard to do? :321GFY

i got rid of the beginning that is childish. but seriously let us help you.

Donny ...first of all.....
good, great, greatest and other similar superlatives in front of "photographer" are ALL SUBJECTIVE terms...and I really could care less about what other dudes who CLAIM they are photographers think about my style or your style of shooting.

I can EASILY find my own personal criticism about your photos (publising photos of the models in MID-BLINK, or when the model is in MID-TURN from pose to pose etc) ...however I do not JUDGE other Internet site owners this way. Your members Im sure LOVE YOUR PHOTOS.....so only YOU KNOW WHATS RIGHT FOR YOUR MARKET

Believe me....I KNOW WHAT MY MARKET IS AND WHAT MY MEMBERS LIKE. ....(unlike some Morons)

THIS THREAD IS RETARDED <--------- god dammit i cant stop with the caps :1orglaugh

FTVGIRLS claims to be photographers. does anyone want a hug?

Nope. Not at all. I was asking if this model is "new" in the way that you claimed, on your site, that Chantelle was "brand new" and discovered by you. When in fact she was discovered by me and appeared on my site 2 months before I sent her down to you as a favor. Sent because of a good reference about you from Todd.


No need, unless you want to go there. It won't make YOU look very good, though. Your call.



Cool. Sure this "friend" didn't shoot her first? Or, for the sake of your ego, is he allowing you to claim you found her?

See my previous post.

and I never CLAIMED I "found" Chantelle nor did I ever claim I was the "FIRST" to shoot her.

So dont come on here and talk LIES about me...that would be ...um ...stupid?

anyone else reading this thread besides Matt, Donovan, and I??

You did indeed have it on your site for quite some time. Bragging about how YOU found Penthouse Pet of the Month Chantelle Fontain. That's why I made the rebuttal page on my site and submitted it to her fan sites.