GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   For those against the war... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=317402)

Shok 06-25-2004 08:12 AM

don't get Rich too riled up, he blow himself up

Corleone 06-25-2004 08:15 AM

The United States of America openly sponsored the al qaida , bin ladin, saddam hussein and and and...
:2 cents:

Shok 06-25-2004 08:29 AM

I openly supported John Wayne Gacey as a clown, but then he went loony and killed everyone, so I no longer supported him.

TheLegacy 06-25-2004 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CamChicks
pre-war article: http://wwwc.house.gov/kaptur/default.asp?contentID=745



Q: Mr. President, why are you so certain that Saddam Hussein has chemical weapons?
A: We kept the receipts.

I didnt want to quote the whole thing hoping that people will read through it.. but very well written and good insight

Rich 06-25-2004 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shok
I openly supported John Wayne Gacey as a clown, but then he went loony and killed everyone, so I no longer supported him.
Were you giving him weapons and training him to rape and kill kids?

sexyclicks 06-25-2004 09:58 AM

http://www.andrewhoog.com/justice/me...eld-saddam.jpg

Shok 06-25-2004 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
Were you giving him weapons and training him to rape and kill kids?

No, I gave him a squeeky nose and some big fucking shoes you moron

Rich 06-26-2004 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shok
No, I gave him a squeeky nose and some big fucking shoes you moron
Ok, because Reagan armed Bin Laden and trained him to fight a holy war, and to train others. Small difference.

jayeff 06-26-2004 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nano
If this all was good and necessary there would be no need to justify it since the first day.
You could go further and say that if it were good and necessary, we could be given the real reasons and the real objectives: it would not be necessary to feed us a load of emotive bullshit.

This is a democratic republic in which our politicians are our representatives and have no mandate to act without our approval. That approval is meaningless if it is gained only by feeding us with disinformation.

That they choose to do so suggests they know they would not get public approval if they told the full and unadorned truth. It is also an indication of the contempt US politicians (the current administration is not alone in this) feel for their electorate. Perhaps that contempt is deserved: most of us make little or no effort to be informed and many play no part whatever in the democratic process. But that does not give politicians a green light to abuse that process.

fudpuck 06-26-2004 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by doober
how about the negative half trillion dollar defecit?

forgot about it so soon?


:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Indeed. :thumbsup Everyone seems to forget.

SomeCreep 06-26-2004 03:43 PM

50 people against the war... :glugglug


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123