GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Should Rich be banned? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=317038)

Rich 06-24-2004 11:25 AM

50 ignorant republican pornographers.

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
ahhh, another idiot joins the fray.
son, there were people who ran into trouble with the law under clinton just because someone ratted them out to the authorities. You have no understanding of the issue.

HE HAS NO UNDERSTANDING OF THE ISSUE? How many people were prosecuted under Clinton, and how many so far under Bush? Don't know? That's because you're a fucking moron.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, you have to be a special kind of fool to support someone who wants YOU out of business and in prison. :1orglaugh

MetaMan 06-24-2004 11:26 AM

HEY RICH I SEE YOUR DUM ASS IS IN THIS THREAD!

you talk big, u said u bet iginla and kipper will be traded,

i will bet u $3k they stay in calgary come next season.

u down? or are u a pussy who just talks alot?

Rich 06-24-2004 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
Ah good one.. I love those porn peddlers defending the conservatives' ideology... and when someone threaten them with a reality check, they scream "low blow"!


So here's a guy, hardcore fan of Bush and an administration trying to pass all kind of obsenity laws... he's running an Interracial site.. and sweating bullets when Rich threaten to report him..? Thats beautiful...

Hey now, there's no room to start making sense in this thread. :winkwink:

TheWildcard 06-24-2004 11:28 AM

banning people from forums = useless

they come back anyway

Rich 06-24-2004 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaMan
HEY RICH I SEE YOUR DUM ASS IS IN THIS THREAD!

you talk big, u said u bet iginla and kipper will be traded,

i will bet u $3k they stay in calgary come next season.

u down? or are u a pussy who just talks alot?


hahahaha, I knew I'd piss of the Alberta crowd with that one! Just fucking with you guys, I love the Flames and I hope both of those guys stay.

It's moot anyway, there will be no NHL season next year. :(

Rich 06-24-2004 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheWildcard
banning people from forums = useless

they come back anyway

If I'm not wanted here I will not come back.

MetaMan 06-24-2004 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
hahahaha, I knew I'd piss of the Alberta crowd with that one! Just fucking with you guys, I love the Flames and I hope both of those guys stay.

It's moot anyway, there will be no NHL season next year. :(

haha all good, id thought id try to tick u off into betting, because it would have been the worst bet of your life. :Graucho :glugglug

Joesho 06-24-2004 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Internet God
Maybe we should ban people like Colin who support Bush since the Bush administration is so against porn.

I vote to BAN COLIN!

That is a very stupid statement to a legitiment question...

and colin is very serious about business, and I am sure has weighed the potential risks of voting for this admiistration for a second term.

you should be as lucky to be as wise or as informed as colin...

grow up man.

TYo answear the question at hand though I say no he should not... if he turned someone in for doing something illegal that is up to him to decide, and for the justice dept. to decide if it actually is illegal, I am not sure of what you are talking about specifically, but I am adding my two cents on the question as a genral question. But I doo agree that if it was done just out of revenge, and not done as an act of trying to do the right thing as he percieved it, then that is pretty weak, and people should judge that accordingly.

12clicks 06-24-2004 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
If I'm not wanted here I will not come back.
don't start a poll about it because besides being embarrassed by it, you won't leave and just give us another example of you being a liar.:1orglaugh

Rich 06-24-2004 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaMan
haha all good, id thought id try to tick u off into betting, because it would have been the worst bet of your life. :Graucho :glugglug
hehe, you almost did with the dumb ass comment. :1orglaugh

I could never bet against one of my favorite teams sticking together though. Plus, it would be suicide for the owners to not keep those two. :glugglug

Rich 06-24-2004 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
don't start a poll about it because besides being embarrassed by it, you won't leave and just give us another example of you being a liar.:1orglaugh
Go ahead and start a poll 12dicksmacks, looks pretty clear that you're in the visible minority on this one.

Rich 06-24-2004 11:41 AM

Ron you're just worried because you know as soon as they set up a website to prosecute scumware I won't hesitate for a second reporting your scamming ass. :1orglaugh

xxxdesign-net 06-24-2004 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
there were people who ran into trouble with the law under clinton just because someone ratted them out to the authorities. You have no understanding of the issue.
no shit... and your point is?! You seem to have a hard time understanding that there is one administration worse than the other... one administration that made
cracking down on obscenity a top priority... one administration that put Ashahahahaha, a religious extremist as the Attorney General..

Where's the "head in the sand" smiley..? lol

12clicks 06-24-2004 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
Go ahead and start a poll 12dicksmacks, looks pretty clear that you're in the visible minority on this one.
yeah, thats what I thought. you know the outcome if YOU started the poll.:1orglaugh

12clicks 06-24-2004 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
no shit... and your point is?! You seem to have a hard time understanding that there is one administration worse than the other... one administration that made
cracking down on obscenity a top priority... one administration that put Ashahahahaha, a religious extremist as the Attorney General..

Where's the "head in the sand" smiley..? lol

really son? can you post a few threads of federal obsinity prosecutions?
that would really teach me a lesson.:1orglaugh

12clicks 06-24-2004 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
Ron you're just worried because you know as soon as they set up a website to prosecute scumware I won't hesitate for a second reporting your scamming ass. :1orglaugh
And once you do, I'll own you son. :winkwink:

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
Support the regime that's trying to end our business is another, and it makes you my enemy and the enemy of everything in this business.
Rich, as a newbie I assume you haven't been in the business long enough to see the last attorney general defending internet censorship in the form of CDA. That's right. ACLU vs. Janet Reno. You weren't around when Clinton signed CDA into law, an unconstitutional abridgement of our rights. Why do I say it was Unconstitutional? Because the (Conservative majority no less) Supreme Court said so. You can thank them.

Before that was Reagan/Bush. Quite a few obscenity cases brought to trial. Again, no friend of the business.

And what would Kerry bring us? Another of those who voted "yea" on the unconstitutional CDA.

Now maybe you know who your enemy is but you sure don't know who your friends are. "Enemy of your business"? You dabble in adult and make pocket change making and submitting AVS sites. You're a part time adult webmaster with a webmaster board personality and that's it. People like 12 Clicks and I have been doing business together for years. Maybe if you spent a little time trying to cultivate business with people like us instead of threatening our businesses you would grow from making your little AVS sites.

xxxdesign-net 06-24-2004 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
really son? can you post a few threads of federal obsinity prosecutions?
that would really teach me a lesson.:1orglaugh

. if it didnt happen yet.. it wont happen... lol.. Sounds like the republican view on global warming... lol

you have religious lobby groups that put pressure on the administration to crackdown on obscenity... they remind the president every chance they get that THEY put him in office... This adminsitration had to deal with the terrorist attacks, Iraq, the economy... and you came up with ..if it didnt happen yet.. it wont happen !?? Dont you ever listen to what your man Ash.cr.oft has to say..?? 12clicks.. you havent made me laugh that hard since you tried to tell us your thoughts on the speed of light and how Einstein was wrong... lol

carry on.. "old man" ...

jimmyf 06-24-2004 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
Do you think a webmaster like Rich should be banned for turning in webmasters to the Dept of Justice on the grounds of obscenity because he disagrees with their political views?

http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...pagen umber=2

he sould be more than banned. He's a asswipe for even saying it even if he didn't mean if. Some thing like that is **NO** joking matter.

Rich 06-24-2004 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
Rich, as a newbie I assume you haven't been in the business long enough to see the last attorney general defending internet censorship in the form of CDA. That's right. ACLU vs. Janet Reno. You weren't around when Clinton signed CDA into law, an unconstitutional abridgement of our rights. Why do I say it was Unconstitutional? Because the (Conservative majority no less) Supreme Court said so. You can thank them.

Before that was Reagan/Bush. Quite a few obscenity cases brought to trial. Again, no friend of the business.

And what would Kerry bring us? Another of those who voted "yea" on the unconstitutional CDA.

Now maybe you know who your enemy is but you sure don't know who your friends are. "Enemy of your business"? You dabble in adult and make pocket change making and submitting AVS sites. You're a part time adult webmaster with a webmaster board personality and that's it. People like 12 Clicks and I have been doing business together for years. Maybe if you spent a little time trying to cultivate business with people like us instead of threatening our businesses you would grow from making your little AVS sites.

I've made tens of millions of dollars in the online Casino business, and I'm more than willing to prove it. For the past year and a half I've been researching the adult industry and trying every different source of traffic I could find. You find one comment about AVS traffic and somehow take that to mean I'm a newbie, ignoring 30 threads about PPC SE's and other things.

Besides the one bet I've offered and you've backed out of, I'd also be willing to bet that I've spent more on Google adwords and at overture on adult terms alone in the past year then you've spent on advertising in your life. Also, before they stopped allowing it I spent more on gaming terms then you've made in your life. $25 per click I was paying at one point and making a profit. Either of those bets I'll take @ $10,000 through escrow.com right now. Put up or shut up time, once again son.

Before talking like you know me you should take me up on my bet so I can prove that you're a fucking liar. Why won't you? Because you're a fucking liar. You have a little more brains then him but when it comes down to it, you're no better than 12clicks. You have no problem lying about someone else maliciously to try to get your point across.

12clicks 06-24-2004 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
. if it didnt happen yet.. it wont happen... lol.. Sounds like the republican view on global warming... lol

you have religious lobby groups that put pressure on the administration to crackdown on obscenity... they remind the president every chance they get that THEY put him in office... This adminsitration had to deal with the terrorist attacks, Iraq, the economy... and you came up with ..if it didnt happen yet.. it wont happen !?? Dont you ever listen to what your man Ash.cr.oft has to say..?? 12clicks.. you havent made me laugh that hard since you tried to tell us your thoughts on the speed of light and how Einstein was wrong... lol

carry on.. "old man" ...

Translation: there are no links. again, I'm talking out of my ass.

12clicks 06-24-2004 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
I've made tens of millions of dollars in the online Casino business, and I'm more than willing to prove it. For the past year and a half I've been researching the adult industry and trying every different source of traffic I could find. You find one comment about AVS traffic and somehow take that to mean I'm a newbie, ignoring 30 threads about PPC SE's and other things.

Besides the one bet I've offered and you've backed out of, I'd also be willing to bet that I've spent more on Google adwords and at overture on adult terms alone in the past year then you've spent on advertising in your life. Also, before they stopped allowing it I spent more on gaming terms then you've made in your life. $25 per click I was paying at one point and making a profit. Either of those bets I'll take @ $10,000 through escrow.com right now. Put up or shut up time, once again son.

Before talking like you know me you should take me up on my bet so I can prove that you're a fucking liar. Why won't you? Because you're a fucking liar. You have a little more brains then him but when it comes down to it, you're no better than 12clicks. You have no problem lying about someone else maliciously to try to get your point across.

beautiful dreamer la de da dahhhhhh...:1orglaugh

Rich 06-24-2004 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
And once you do, I'll own you son. :winkwink:
Well that would actually be nice for a change, I'm getting bored of owning you every time you open your mouth here. It's too easy.

Still getting your information from the "World Tribune"? Rush's favorite "big UK Newspaper"? Maybe that's who told you that Clinton was prosecuting pornographers to the same degree Bush is. :1orglaugh

Oh wait, your favorite source isn't a "big UK Newspaper" like Rush told you it was. In fact, it's a pathetic little propaganda website run by a Reverend Sun Myung Moon follower from his basement. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Talk about owned.

12clicks 06-24-2004 12:25 PM

I love how "if I'm not wanted here I'll leave" turns into "I've made 10s of millions of dollars"
:1orglaugh


just post your poll and then leave.:1orglaugh

12clicks 06-24-2004 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
Well that would actually be nice for a change, I'm getting bored of owning you every time you open your mouth here. It's too easy.

Still getting your information from the "World Tribune"? Rush's favorite "big UK Newspaper"? Maybe that's who told you that Clinton was prosecuting pornographers to the same degree Bush is. :1orglaugh

Oh wait, your favorite source isn't a "big UK Newspaper" like Rush told you it was. In fact, it's a pathetic little propaganda website run by a Reverend Sun Myung Moon follower from his basement. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Talk about owned.

ahahaha, you've owned me just about as many times as you';ve made millions on the net.
I suggest you go back to that thread and read it again before you embarrass yourself further.

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
I've made tens of millions of dollars in the online Casino business, and I'm more than willing to prove it. For the past year and a half I've been researching the adult industry and trying every different source of traffic I could find. You find one comment about AVS traffic and somehow take that to mean I'm a newbie, ignoring 30 threads about PPC SE's and other things.

Besides the one bet I've offered and you've backed out of, I'd also be willing to bet that I've spent more on Google adwords and at overture on adult terms alone in the past year then you've spent on advertising in your life. Also, before they stopped allowing it I spent more on gaming terms then you've made in your life. $25 per click I was paying at one point and making a profit. Either of those bets I'll take @ $10,000 through escrow.com right now. Put up or shut up time, once again son.

Before talking like you know me you should take me up on my bet so I can prove that you're a fucking liar. Why won't you? Because you're a fucking liar. You have a little more brains then him but when it comes down to it, you're no better than 12clicks. You have no problem lying about someone else maliciously to try to get your point across.

Can you say "desperately seeking the social approval of his superiors"? Is there a DSM IV term for that?

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
I love how "if I'm not wanted here I'll leave" turns into "I've made 10s of millions of dollars"
:1orglaugh


just post your poll and then leave.:1orglaugh

How long do you think it will be before Rich starts bragging about his "3 college degrees" again? What do you think they are in?

12clicks 06-24-2004 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
Can you say "desperately seeking the social approval of his superiors"? Is there a DSM IV term for that?
yeah, its called "little man's desease" :1orglaugh

Rich 06-24-2004 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
Translation: there are no links. again, I'm talking out of my ass.
Are you saying that Bush and Asskroft aren't fighting porn? If I get you some links, will you shut the fuck up already? I'm not going to waste my time educating you again if it's just going to go in one ear and out the other like it always does.

You want links? lol

http://www.obscenitycrimes.org/

Report yourself there and see if your right wing bullshit saves you from "God's wrath". :1orglaugh

xxxdesign-net 06-24-2004 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
Translation: there are no links. again, I'm talking out of my ass.
Funny how in your own mind you've put me in my place... lol

I just answered your questions about the links and yet you refuse to understand what I said...

http://ystv.york.ac.uk/fun/caption/caption01.jpg
a young 12clicks?

12clicks 06-24-2004 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
How long do you think it will be before Rich starts bragging about his "3 college degrees" again?
or his corvette. you know, when you've made 10s of millions of dollars with casinos, I here that the status symbol.
:1orglaugh

Pleasurepays 06-24-2004 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
I've made tens of millions of dollars in the online Casino business, and I'm more than willing to prove it. For the past year and a half I've been researching the adult industry and trying every different source of traffic I could find. You find one comment about AVS traffic and somehow take that to mean I'm a newbie, ignoring 30 threads about PPC SE's and other things.

Besides the one bet I've offered and you've backed out of, I'd also be willing to bet that I've spent more on Google adwords and at overture on adult terms alone in the past year then you've spent on advertising in your life. Also, before they stopped allowing it I spent more on gaming terms then you've made in your life. $25 per click I was paying at one point and making a profit. Either of those bets I'll take @ $10,000 through escrow.com right now. Put up or shut up time, once again son.
why would anyone have to bet $10,000.00 just to get you to back up your rediculous claims about sucess and wealth if those claims were legitimate?

someone as successful as you claim to be would not be spending his time on GFY posting all day about nothing.

if you have $10,000.00 to risk... you better hang on to it. i suspect it would be the most money you have ever had in one sum in your life.

12clicks 06-24-2004 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
Are you saying that Bush and Asskroft aren't fighting porn?
No, I'm saying you're a loser who wouldn't dare make a poll about leaving because your ego couldn't take the truth.:1orglaugh

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
Rich, as a newbie I assume you haven't been in the business long enough to see the last attorney general defending internet censorship in the form of CDA. That's right. ACLU vs. Janet Reno. You weren't around when Clinton signed CDA into law, an unconstitutional abridgement of our rights. Why do I say it was Unconstitutional? Because the (Conservative majority no less) Supreme Court said so. You can thank them.

Before that was Reagan/Bush. Quite a few obscenity cases brought to trial. Again, no friend of the business.

And what would Kerry bring us? Another of those who voted "yea" on the unconstitutional CDA.

Rich,

What do you think of the above? I noticed you ignored it. Do you even know what CDA was? It was a law passed that made it a crime punishable by two years in jail and/or a $250,000 fine for anyone to engage in speech that is "indecent" or "patently offensive" on computer networks if the speech can be viewed by a minor.

The ACLU filed suits to keep Reno from beginning the prosecutions.

Now, I'm not happy one bit that Ashhahahahaha has 32 prosecutors ready to prosecute obscenity but any reasoned non-partisan analysis would come to the conclusion that the last administration was just as bad and the only thing that stopped them was the Supreme Court.

Don't you agree?

Rich 06-24-2004 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
Can you say "desperately seeking the social approval of his superiors"? Is there a DSM IV term for that?
Desperately seeking approval? That's what it's called when you defend yourself against malicious comments made by two people?

If I'm so crazy then take my $10,000 you lying sack of shit. 3 bets are on the table, surely you could at least win one of them, right? Don't hate me because you went to an ivy league school and still have to work 9-5 to pay your bills.

Don't make me pull out the picture of tweety bird chirping away. That's seems to be all you big talkers can do, chirp. Everything I say I'm perfectly willing to back up, you should be embarrassed that you can't say the same.

12clicks 06-24-2004 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
Funny how in your own mind you've put me in my place... lol

I just answered your questions about the links and yet you refuse to understand what I said...

I understand clearly. there are no links. :1orglaugh

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
Desperately seeking approval? That's what it's called when you defend yourself against malicious comments made by two people?

Look at me! I'm Rich! I make hundreds of millions secretly in the casino business but no, I can't tell you which sites. Shhhh! It's a secret!

Rich 06-24-2004 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
or his corvette. you know, when you've made 10s of millions of dollars with casinos, I here that the status symbol.
:1orglaugh

Not everyone has a tiny dick and needs to buy status symbols and have a handlebar mustache. I buy a new Z06 every year or two because Corvettes have been my passion since I was a kid, and I enjoy ripping out to the lake in them. My actions are not designed to impress you or anyone, they're designed for my own personal enjoyment. People who don't have inferiority complexes like you do will understand where I'm coming from.

12clicks 06-24-2004 12:45 PM

little man's desease:
taking a thread about one thing and turning it into a platform to lie about how much you have (again):1orglaugh

Rich 06-24-2004 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
Rich,

What do you think of the above? I noticed you ignored it. Do you even know what CDA was? It was a law passed that made it a crime punishable by two years in jail and/or a $250,000 fine for anyone to engage in speech that is "indecent" or "patently offensive" on computer networks if the speech can be viewed by a minor.

The ACLU filed suits to keep Reno from beginning the prosecutions.

Now, I'm not happy one bit that Ashhahahahaha has 32 prosecutors ready to prosecute obscenity but any reasoned non-partisan analysis would come to the conclusion that the last administration was just as bad and the only thing that stopped them was the Supreme Court.

Don't you agree?

I do agree that the Clinton administration was going to prosecute pornographers as well, I don't know where you think I argued that. I know both you and I understand the difference in degrees, one was making a voter pleasing eye candy attempt, and the other has made it their #1 priority. If they would have launched a site like the one Asskroft has, I would have fought it too.

12clicks 06-24-2004 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
Not everyone has a tiny dick and needs to buy status symbols and have a handlebar mustache.
dude, its not cool to bring your wife into this thread.
Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
I buy a new Z06 every year or two because Corvettes have been my passion since I was a kid, and I enjoy ripping out to the lake in them.
ohhhhhhhh, a z06, my bad! :1orglaugh
Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
My actions are not designed to impress you or anyone,
but your posts are.
Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
People who don't have inferiority complexes like you do will understand where I'm coming from.
I understand completely. please go back to talking about your millions, little man.:1orglaugh

xxxdesign-net 06-24-2004 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
Rich,

What do you think of the above? I noticed you ignored it. Do you even know what CDA was? It was a law passed that made it a crime punishable by two years in jail and/or a $250,000 fine for anyone to engage in speech that is "indecent" or "patently offensive" on computer networks if the speech can be viewed by a minor.

The ACLU filed suits to keep Reno from beginning the prosecutions.

Now, I'm not happy one bit that Ashhahahahaha has 32 prosecutors ready to prosecute obscenity but any reasoned non-partisan analysis would come to the conclusion that the last administration was just as bad and the only thing that stopped them was the Supreme Court.

Don't you agree?


Please... you talk about a time when internet was new and the though of regulating the internet was a legitimate idea... Second.. parties in the opposition are known to contradict the party in power just for the sake of it.... NOW.. things are different.. the republicans are in power... elcted on a mandate to crackdown on obscenity... they have put it on their list of top priorities... put Asch.c.roft as Attorney General... Now.. as a " reasoned non-partisan analysis" .. tell me.. that a future Bush administartion elected will not be worst for people working in the adult industry then a Kerry administration...? and please.. try to keep a straight face...

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
I do agree that the Clinton administration was going to prosecute pornographers as well, I don't know where you think I argued that. I know both you and I understand the difference in degrees, one was making a voter pleasing eye candy attempt, and the other has made it their #1 priority. If they would have launched a site like the one Asskroft has, I would have fought it too.
You've got to be kidding. A $250,000 fine and 2 years in jail is not pleasing to this voter and the fact that you would dismiss it as "eye candy" is really pathetic. That was one frightening time for the business when that law passed. The only difference is that you are trying to tell a story "Bush Bad, Clinton Good" and to do so you are willing to argue that Clinton was "just trying to please voters" by imposing $250,000 fines and 2 year jail sentences on us. Sad, Rich. I know you weren't around back then but read up on it a little. You'll see what I mean.

12clicks 06-24-2004 12:55 PM

well, my day is over. it was fun.
see you tomorrow you casino millionaire you!

Rich 06-24-2004 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
Look at me! I'm Rich! I make hundreds of millions secretly in the casino business but no, I can't tell you which sites. Shhhh! It's a secret!
Look at me??? I've kept quiet about my money for 2 years until you started guys continually bringing it up. I don't brag or try to bring other people down, not online and not in my personal life. Money is not that important to me, I'm glad I have it but I wouldn't trade it for my family, friends, health, or intelligence.

What am I supposed to say, 'yeah, you guys are right, I have 1 AVS site and that's my life'? I've laughed off 12dicks "McDonalds" jokes for 2 years because he just makes himself look stupid. When you and Pathfinder all start slandering me, I feel the need to defend myself. I guess I should ignore you all and be the bigger man like I have been with 12dicks, but after a while a guy gets fed up with you jackasses. AVS isn't even close to the biggest part of my adult business, in fact I don't even have 1 AVS site anymore. Come to think of it, with my AVS empire gone, how the fuck am I paying for the internet connection I'm using???!! Shit, can someone lend me $100 so I can keep posting? :1orglaugh

I keep a low profile here because it's a controversial place and I say controversial things, if you don't like it then YOU LEAVE. Or, buy the board and ban me. :321GFY

Rich 06-24-2004 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
You've got to be kidding. A $250,000 fine and 2 years in jail is not pleasing to this voter and the fact that you would dismiss it as "eye candy" is really pathetic. That was one frightening time for the business when that law passed. The only difference is that you are trying to tell a story "Bush Bad, Clinton Good" and to do so you are willing to argue that Clinton was "just trying to please voters" by imposing $250,000 fines and 2 year jail sentences on us. Sad, Rich. I know you weren't around back then but read up on it a little. You'll see what I mean.
That's the maximum, and it was for illegal sites such as beastility and child porn accesible to minors if I'm not mistaken. If I remember correctly this law was NOT going to affect pay sites or AVS sites at all. (thank God for me, lol).

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
Please... you talk about a time when internet was new and the though of regulating the internet was a legitimate idea.
Interesting theory but then three years later Clinton signed COPA and again there was a trial and again it was ruled unconstitutional.

BVF 06-24-2004 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
you couldn't be more wrong.
If a surfer came in here and started threatening to file complaints, he'd be banned.
Bich is nothing more than a surfer pretending to be in this industry. Threatening someone else's business on a business board, should be grounds for banning.

Which is why 49th Parallel should be banned for some stupid shit he said to me. He's just a fucking lowlife who hides and does nothing but file complaints like a BITCH.

http://board.gofuckyourself.com/show...hreadid=311668

This fuck should be banned.

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
That's the maximum, and it was for illegal sites such as beastility and child porn accesible to minors if I'm not mistaken. If I remember correctly this law was NOT going to affect pay sites or AVS sites at all. (thank God for me, lol).
You think it was ruled unconstitutional to protect bestiality and child porn? No, it was ruled unconstitutional because it violated the court's interpretation of what the first amendment protects.

You are correct that pay sites and AVS would have likely not been targeted. I don't see that argument as any different than the many adult webmasters who think the chance of the current admin prosecuting them in particular as being very low. You are making the same argument Republicans are. "I don't think it will effect me so who cares?"

Rich 06-24-2004 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
You think it was ruled unconstitutional to protect bestiality and child porn? No, it was ruled unconstitutional because it violated the court's interpretation of what the first amendment protects.

You are correct that pay sites and AVS would have likely not been targeted. I don't see that argument as any different than the many adult webmasters who think the chance of the current admin prosecuting them in particular as being very low. You are making the same argument Republicans are. "I don't think it will effect me so who cares?"

I didn't say I didn't care, I said I would be against it as well. While I don't support it, I do however see the DIFFERENCE between an honest attempt to keep kids away from porn, and shutting down legal adult only websites.

Please don't get the idea that I think Clinton was the almighty perfect President. I do think he was a great man who was honestly trying to make the world a better place, and did, but he also did fuck up several times. Rwanda being #1, I was sending letters to everyone in his administration while that was going on.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123