How many military deaths is acceptable? - GoFuckYourself.com

M_M · 06-21-2004, 02:26 PM

This question is mainly directed at supporters of war.

Let's say Bush or any other president, says that some country is a threat just like Iraq. Maybe Iran or Arabia or something... And we decide to invade them as well.

Assume that this country turns out to be a much tougher job.

How many troops dying would be an acceptable rate, until US decides to pull out because of the losses?

10 per day? 100? 1000?

We're lucky that we're averaging only 1 per day right now.

STiNKyMeAT · 06-21-2004, 03:03 PM

lilj · 06-21-2004, 03:04 PM

Not sure but i think 0 will do

TheWildcard · 06-21-2004, 03:05 PM

3 million a year.

M_M · 06-21-2004, 03:06 PM

WANTED: intelligent answers

StuartD · 06-21-2004, 03:06 PM

The military would tell you that 0 fatalities is all they will tolerate.

M_M · 06-21-2004, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
The military would tell you that 0 fatalities is all they will tolerate.

I said until the number of losses becomes a reason for pulling out.

We have more than 0 now, and it seems to be tolerated, as we are not pulling out because of it.

Shit man, how complicated is my question.

StuartD · 06-21-2004, 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by M_M
I said until the number of losses becomes a reason for pulling out.

We have more than 0 now, and it seems to be tolerated, as we are not pulling out because of it.

Shit man, how complicated is my question.

But your question has been answered, indirectly.

0 is all they will tolerate, and yet... there they are.

The truth of the matter is, the more they lose, the more they'll stay. It's a driving factor I think. If not a single US soldier died, if the people cheered..... well, I think the US would have pulled out a long time ago.

MiSsBeHeaDReSs · 06-21-2004, 03:11 PM

0 fatalities .

M_M · 06-21-2004, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
But your question has been answered, indirectly.

0 is all they will tolerate, and yet... there they are.

The truth of the matter is, the more they lose, the more they'll stay. It's a driving factor I think. If not a single US soldier died, if the people cheered..... well, I think the US would have pulled out a long time ago.

that still doesnt answer my main question

i'm not asking about toleration. i'm asking how many deaths it takes to have the military pulled out. how hard is that to understand?

obviously less than 1000 and more than 1, right?

but what would happen at a rate of 10 per day or 100? can you tell?

M_M · 06-21-2004, 03:19 PM

"0" is not the answer!!

we have more than 0 and not pulling out

please somebody show me a sign of intelligence and give a reasonable answer here.

StuartD · 06-21-2004, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by M_M
that still doesnt answer my main question

i'm not asking about toleration. i'm asking how many deaths it takes to have the military pulled out. how hard is that to understand?

obviously less than 1000 and more than 1, right?

but what would happen at a rate of 10 per day or 100? can you tell?

Like I said.. if you had read all of my post... the more fatalities, the more they stay. If they had 10 per day, they'd just send more troops.

if there was 0 per day, they'd have left by now.

M_M · 06-21-2004, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
Like I said.. if you had read all of my post... the more fatalities, the more they stay. If they had 10 per day, they'd just send more troops.

if there was 0 per day, they'd have left by now.

that is only true for countries that can easily be defeated.

if you can't slow down the deaths by sending more troops, then you will have no choice but pull out.

skinnay · 06-21-2004, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by M_M
"0" is not the answer!!

we have more than 0 and not pulling out

please somebody show me a sign of intelligence and give a reasonable answer here.

you ask a stupid question, you get stupid answers.

directfiesta · 06-21-2004, 03:32 PM

" as many as it takes to get the job done ... " G.W. Bush

could have said that.

or did he?

M_M · 06-21-2004, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by skinnay
you ask a stupid question, you get stupid answers.

if nobody has told you yet today, you are dumb

mardigras · 06-21-2004, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by M_M
that still doesnt answer my main question

i'm not asking about toleration. i'm asking how many deaths it takes to have the military pulled out.

You're asking when the US would wave the white flag? Not likely until they ran low on draftees...

06-21-2004, 02:26 PM	#1
M_M Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 1,167	How many military deaths is acceptable? This question is mainly directed at supporters of war. Let's say Bush or any other president, says that some country is a threat just like Iraq. Maybe Iran or Arabia or something... And we decide to invade them as well. Assume that this country turns out to be a much tougher job. How many troops dying would be an acceptable rate, until US decides to pull out because of the losses? 10 per day? 100? 1000? We're lucky that we're averaging only 1 per day right now.

06-21-2004, 03:03 PM	#2
STiNKyMeAT Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Kansass Posts: 167	0? __________________ !!TNACASH.COM!!

06-21-2004, 03:04 PM	#3
lilj Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 1,536	Not sure but i think 0 will do __________________ Does your network need a Reality Check? [ Find Out ]

06-21-2004, 03:06 PM	#6
StuartD Sofa King Band Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Outside the box Posts: 29,903	The military would tell you that 0 fatalities is all they will tolerate. __________________ This is me on facebook This is me on twitter

06-21-2004, 03:11 PM	#9
MiSsBeHeaDReSs Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Location: I'm the girl next door ;) ICQ~ 338579597 Posts: 534	0 fatalities . __________________ Why geeks like computers: unzip, strip, touch, finger, grep, mount, fsck, ram, more, yes,fsck,fsck,fsck,umount, sleep.

06-21-2004, 03:05 PM	#4
TheWildcard So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 4,759	3 million a year.

06-21-2004, 03:19 PM	#11
M_M Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 1,167	"0" is not the answer!! we have more than 0 and not pulling out please somebody show me a sign of intelligence and give a reasonable answer here.

06-21-2004, 03:32 PM	#15
directfiesta Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Montreal, Quebec Posts: 29,676	" as many as it takes to get the job done ... " G.W. Bush could have said that. or did he? __________________ I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....