Will we see the end of Google image link with the proposed 2257?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Quotealex
    Confirmed User
    • Sep 2001
    • 6265

    #1

    Will we see the end of Google image link with the proposed 2257?

    That would be great IMO.
  • mrgica
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2004
    • 2169

    #2
    new 2257 = for hardcore sex images, adult stuff
    Fuck it dude, lets go bowling

    Comment

    • Quotealex
      Confirmed User
      • Sep 2001
      • 6265

      #3
      Originally posted by mrgica
      new 2257 = for hardcore sex images, adult stuff
      Don't they list all thumbs, soft and hard!

      Comment

      • crockett
        in a van by the river
        • May 2003
        • 76818

        #4
        they don't host the images, they only resize it and hotlink it
        In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

        Comment

        • enter »
          Confirmed User
          • Jul 2004
          • 2362

          #5
          Originally posted by Alex from Montreal
          Don't they list all thumbs, soft and hard!
          Yup.
          «-- offer extended through New Years (icq286487452)

          Comment

          • pornstar2pac
            Omaha Hi/Lo
            • Nov 2003
            • 17380

            #6
            what about google cached links too?
            Trump haters gonna hate. that's all they can do

            Comment

            • Quotealex
              Confirmed User
              • Sep 2001
              • 6265

              #7
              Originally posted by crockett
              they don't host the images, they only resize it and hotlink it
              And what's the different in term of the law? plus doesn't Google have a cache (host a backup) of every page on the net!

              Comment

              • extreme
                Confirmed User
                • Oct 2002
                • 2120

                #8
                Originally posted by Alex from Montreal
                And what's the different in term of the law? plus doesn't Google have a cache (host a backup) of every page on the net!
                dont think they cache the images themselves?

                Comment

                • Shoplifter
                  Richest man in Babylon
                  • Jan 2002
                  • 5878

                  #9
                  Hope not I do bank on the image searches...

                  I Like Blondes

                  Comment

                  • fr8
                    Confirmed User
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 5074

                    #10
                    dont they host the thumbs that show?
                    joesmut (a) gmail Dot com
                    Full Stack Developer

                    Comment

                    • strobi
                      Confirmed User
                      • Nov 2002
                      • 7383

                      #11
                      Originally posted by fr8
                      dont they host the thumbs that show?
                      I guess so... alot of times the page is dead but the thumb is still up.

                      Comment

                      • JulianSosa
                        Confirmed User
                        • Aug 2003
                        • 3042

                        #12
                        Originally posted by crockett
                        they don't host the images, they only resize it and hotlink it






                        http://images.google.com/images?q=tb.../couple059.jpg

                        Comment

                        • DamnGoodRatio
                          Confirmed User
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 855

                          #13
                          They definitely cache the images. The thumbnail will show, even on a result that is now a 404.
                          Obama Said: "We can absorb a terrorist attack."

                          Comment

                          • rowan
                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                            • Mar 2002
                            • 17393

                            #14
                            A judge isn't going to know or care what hotlinking is. If he can see a hardcore thumb in Google's results then he'll consider that Google are presenting that content.

                            Comment

                            • Satan
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jun 2005
                              • 1626

                              #15
                              Google already breaks the law, with the current images of beast etc.. so why should they worry? They're obviously above the law..
                              WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU?

                              Comment

                              • Rich
                                So Fucking Banned
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 11486

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Satan
                                They're obviously above the law..

                                Comment

                                • Quotealex
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Sep 2001
                                  • 6265

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Satan
                                  Google already breaks the law, with the current images of beast etc.. so why should they worry? They're obviously above the law..
                                  I guess there two laws in the USA! One for the Multi-Billion dollar corporations and indiviuals that can pretty much get away with murder, and another for the others....

                                  Comment

                                  • Quotealex
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Sep 2001
                                    • 6265

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by DamnGoodRatio
                                    They definitely cache the images. The thumbnail will show, even on a result that is now a 404.
                                    Exacly. All those super-computers they got all over the place must doing more than just crawling, indexing and running algo!

                                    Comment

                                    • Theo
                                      HAL 9000
                                      • May 2001
                                      • 34515

                                      #19
                                      Nothing will change for google. Mark my words.

                                      Comment

                                      • Quotealex
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Sep 2001
                                        • 6265

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Soul_Rebel
                                        Nothing will change for google. Mark my words.
                                        Well the DOJ could go after them just to scare off others and force them to comply with 2257

                                        Comment

                                        Working...