Babagirls |
05-18-2004 01:09 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by Trixie
Personally I think that if the "ugliest" of us had entered Malezia's pic we would have won. Maybe I'm being overly idealistic though. It was the highest quality and most creative picture.
I know this sounds bitchy, but the fact that uncreative low quality pics got votes at all probably has more to do with politics of this board than the fact that those entrants were eliminated. Still, it does suck that people who are not content producers probably don't have high quality camera equipment so in that respect I guess it was kind of unfair. Then again, seems like a successful webmaster who really wants to win would invest a couple hundred bucks in a decent camera.
|
i agree (and i like that you are being honest and not fake) with your post (well, mostly).
i didnt have a pro-photographer or cam. acutally, i did 3 different shoots ,each several times (and still have all of the pics) and 99% of them didnt turn out right. Why? Cuz the hubby doesnt know how to take pics LOL
it sucks that i put in at least 20+ acutal working hours into a pic, and had to send in an "ok" picture. my original idea was AWESOME but the pics didnt turn out. :(
and im more pissed that girls that took (and obviously took) less than 30 mins to do, got thru to week #2. and that girls that had great ideas got booted or got low votes and barely made the cut.
im glad malezia won, i voted for her pic as well (if my vote counted). i just highly disagree with certain aspects of the contest.
just my :2 cents:
|