GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Wmd Found In Iraq (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=296929)

directfiesta 05-17-2004 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by RocHard


Then for years they shot at our planes enforcing the United Nations treaty. Pay attention to that; Iraq shot million dollar missiles at our multi million dollar planes. That in itself is grounds for us to invade Iraq.

In the US sky????

Get an education before repeating stupidities that you read here....

No-Fly zone were NOT UN resolutions, but unilateral act of war from the US, UK and originaly France ( which pulled out after seeing that it was not to protect the Kurds and Shiites, but to spy and destroy iraq facilities).

BTW, how many planes and pilots did the US lose ...

With " million dollar" missiles, they must have shot down quite afew....

Buff 05-17-2004 08:22 AM

What perplexes me is that some people actually believe Hussein didn't want WMD and wasn't trying to develop WMD. They think he really destroyed all his stockpiles and shut down all his research.

The same people who believe this, believe bush is both a retard and a diabolical mastermind.

And then they tell those of us who know Hussein would be crazy NOT to develop WMD that we're the nutjobs.

Idiots.

FlyingIguana 05-17-2004 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff
Sarin Nerve Agent

So to recap:

1) Terrorists are in Iraq
2) WMD are in Iraq

Looks like Bush told the truth.


Suck a fat cock, you cross-eyed monkey-fucking leftard pieces of shit.

al queda wasn't in iraq.

my biggest beef was how they went about the war. they just rushed in without UN support which means the states flips the bill for the war. stupid, stupid move by bush.

the real terroist threat was allowed to regroup and start planning for another attack in the future. bush had his own agenda.

directfiesta 05-17-2004 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff
What perplexes me is that some people actually believe Hussein didn't want WMD and wasn't trying to develop WMD. They think he really destroyed all his stockpiles and shut down all his research.

Idiots.

True. That could never happen from a dictator!

Oooops. Forgot about Lybia... Kadafi.... Didn't he just do that?

Buff, go to school or pick up a book: food for your brain...

cluck 05-17-2004 08:26 AM

Stop calling leftists saddam sympathizers. NOBODY likes saddam over here. In fact, the left wing SHOULDN'T like muslims because we're supposed to be for a godless society.

The issue is doing what's right for our country and the world, economically if nothing else.

cosis 05-17-2004 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
If there is one there is more.


bringer 05-17-2004 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by NickPapageorgio
Means nothing at this point. CIA could have planted that shit. It is a 50/50 chance one way or the other.:2 cents:
you'd say that if they were found on day 1

The Truth Hurts 05-17-2004 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta
True. That could never happen from a dictator!

Oooops. Forgot about Lybia... Kadafi.... Didn't he just do that?



yeah, he did it out of the goodness of his heart.

Buff 05-17-2004 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta
True. That could never happen from a dictator!

Oooops. Forgot about Lybia... Kadafi.... Didn't he just do that?

Buff, go to school or pick up a book: food for your brain...

A coincidence right? That Libya comes clean after we attack Iraq?

Try studying history.

directfiesta 05-17-2004 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bringer
you'd say that if they were found on day 1
Please correct " they" for " one" ... and notice that :

Quote:

Kimmitt did not say where the weapon was found nor did he say if it originated in Iraq.

Corleone 05-17-2004 08:29 AM

50 false news

CIA sources on Iraq were 'deliberately misleading:' Powell
The Central Intelligence Agency and other US Government institutions were sometimes deliberately misled about alleged Iraqi weapons of mass destruction in the run-up to the war, Secretary of State Colin Powell has admitted.

The comments, made on Sunday in an interview with NBC television, represented the first public official admission that the US Government had been fed disinformation about Saddam Hussein's suspect arsenal of chemical and biological weapons and relayed it to the world community without questioning it.


again
news from this morning
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1110149.htm

Babel 05-17-2004 08:29 AM

I sell bridges for those who beleive that shit is not staged

bringer 05-17-2004 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta
Please correct " they" for " one" ... and notice that :
one so far
more to come
ill let you know when my cia buddies plant them

Buff 05-17-2004 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Babel
I sell bridges for those who beleive that shit is not staged
When you're sitting around your parents' basement masturbating with a jar of peanut butter and molding your shit into 10 pound busts of Lenin, do you know you're insane, or do you think you're normal?

Call us when the shuttle lands.

EviLGuY 05-17-2004 08:31 AM

What difference does it make at this point? :)

Too late and too much doubletalk I think.

cluck 05-17-2004 08:32 AM

I don't think it was staged. If they were going to plant it they'd have planted something serious.

My guess is it came in with some migrating terrorists who decided to set up cells in the new iraq.

bringer 05-17-2004 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by XxXotic
that still doesn't justify our presence there, nor does it take away from the fact bush is a crook and has run this nation into a hole
is that your new angle now that you cant say "BUSH LIED ABOUT WMD which made the war unjustified" ?

Buff 05-17-2004 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by cluck
I don't think it was staged. If they were going to plant it they'd have planted something serious.

My guess is it came in with some migrating terrorists who decided to set up cells in the new iraq.

Why wouldn't those migrating terrorists used the WMD somewhere else already? Because the WMD are from Iraq.

Buff 05-17-2004 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bringer
is that your new angle now that you cant say "BUSH LIED ABOUT WMD which made the war unjustified" ?
Well it's either going to be that or "Bush put them there."

Either way, the leftist peace party will never admit they were wrong.

Flu 05-17-2004 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by cluck
I don't think it was staged. If they were going to plant it they'd have planted something serious.

My guess is it came in with some migrating terrorists who decided to set up cells in the new iraq.

we have a winner...


hardly seems like that was much of a WMD if it was detonated and nothing was mass destroyed :1orglaugh

bringer 05-17-2004 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff
Why wouldn't those migrating terrorists used the WMD somewhere else already? Because the WMD are from Iraq.
i guess the terrorists can afford them but saddam couldnt

unconnected 05-17-2004 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff
Sarin Nerve Agent

So to recap:

1) Terrorists are in Iraq
2) WMD are in Iraq

Looks like Bush told the truth.


Suck a fat cock, you cross-eyed monkey-fucking leftard pieces of shit.

Wow..
The prime example of inbred brain washed americans steps forward

the artillery shell was found on an Al-Queda bomber you fucking moron.. Meaning it was probably brought into the country. Plus I don't quite think that ONE artillery shell with a small amount of nerve gas, which didn't even hurt anyone after it went off, really constitutes Weapons of Mass Destruction.. As the name says these weapons are supposed to be able to cause MASS DESTRUCTION..
How is it possible that you could possible be so in love with Bush, so fucking stupid, and yet live in the USA? What the fuck have you been smoking man

magicmike 05-17-2004 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Corleone
http://www.benybont.com/other/wmd.jpg

haha

its true.

:)

xenophobic 05-17-2004 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Corleone
http://www.benybont.com/other/wmd.jpg
Did everyone else keep their receipts too?

The 12,000-page weapons declaration that Iraq delivered to the United Nations on Dec. 7 details the history of its chemical weapons program before the 1991 gulf war, listing dozens of foreign companies that provided most of the chemicals and equipment needed for the program.
American officials and private weapons specialists say the list identifies 31 major foreign suppliers - including two based in the United States.
Of the 31 companies named in 1996, most are European, including 14 from Germany, 3 each from the Netherlands and Switzerland and 2 each from France and Austria.
Spokesmen for both TUI and one of the successor companies of Hoechst said their major chemical units were sold off years ago; the spokesmen said they were convinced that Preussag and Hoechst had done nothing wrong in their dealings with Iraq.
The Iraqi declaration said that in 1982, Preussag provided Iraq with 30 tons of phosphorous oxychloride, a chemical used to make the deadly nerve gas sarin, and equipment for its chemical weapons laboratories. Hoechst is identified as the seller of 10 tons of phosphorous oxychloride.
Alcolac, the Baltimore company, pleaded guilty in 1989 to federal export violations involving shipments of chemicals that could be used by Iraq to make mustard gas.
According to the Iraqi declaration, officials said, Alcolac provided thiodiglycol, the mustard gas precursor, while Al Haddad, the other American company, was the source of 60 tons of a chemical that could be used to make sarin.
There is no telephone listing for Al Haddad in Nashville, where it was based. News reports in the 1980's identified the company's owner as Sahib al-Haddad, an Iraqi by birth, who denied that he had shipped any chemicals to Iraq for use in weapons.
By sheer bulk, a Singapore-based company may have been the largest supplier of the chemicals used in the 1980's to make chemical weapons, including 3,300 tons of a chemical that can be used to make nerve gas and 950 tons of an separate chemical used to make mustard gas and sarin.

Flu 05-17-2004 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bringer
is that your new angle now that you cant say "BUSH LIED ABOUT WMD which made the war unjustified" ?

my god you're daft.
ONE round hardly justified an entire war.

bringer 05-17-2004 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Flu
my god you're daft.
ONE round hardly justified an entire war.

you're right. we finished searching iraq completely and only found 1 round. idiot
ill bookmark and bump this thread when they find more
then what will you say? "we only found enough to kill the state of california! hardly enough to justify a war"

Buff 05-17-2004 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by xenophobic
Did everyone else keep their receipts too?

The 12,000-page weapons declaration that Iraq delivered to the United Nations on Dec. 7 details the history of its chemical weapons program before the 1991 gulf war, listing dozens of foreign companies that provided most of the chemicals and equipment needed for the program.
American officials and private weapons specialists say the list identifies 31 major foreign suppliers - including two based in the United States.
Of the 31 companies named in 1996, most are European, including 14 from Germany, 3 each from the Netherlands and Switzerland and 2 each from France and Austria.
Spokesmen for both TUI and one of the successor companies of Hoechst said their major chemical units were sold off years ago; the spokesmen said they were convinced that Preussag and Hoechst had done nothing wrong in their dealings with Iraq.
The Iraqi declaration said that in 1982, Preussag provided Iraq with 30 tons of phosphorous oxychloride, a chemical used to make the deadly nerve gas sarin, and equipment for its chemical weapons laboratories. Hoechst is identified as the seller of 10 tons of phosphorous oxychloride.
Alcolac, the Baltimore company, pleaded guilty in 1989 to federal export violations involving shipments of chemicals that could be used by Iraq to make mustard gas.
According to the Iraqi declaration, officials said, Alcolac provided thiodiglycol, the mustard gas precursor, while Al Haddad, the other American company, was the source of 60 tons of a chemical that could be used to make sarin.
There is no telephone listing for Al Haddad in Nashville, where it was based. News reports in the 1980's identified the company's owner as Sahib al-Haddad, an Iraqi by birth, who denied that he had shipped any chemicals to Iraq for use in weapons.
By sheer bulk, a Singapore-based company may have been the largest supplier of the chemicals used in the 1980's to make chemical weapons, including 3,300 tons of a chemical that can be used to make nerve gas and 950 tons of an separate chemical used to make mustard gas and sarin.

Don't go there yet -- I want to watch them squirm about the discovered WMD first, then you can make them dance to that other tune.

Flu 05-17-2004 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bringer
you're right. we finished searching iraq completely and only found 1 round. idiot
ill bookmark and bump this thread when they find more
then what will you say? "we only found enough to kill the state of california! hardly enough to justify a war"

when you find more al qaeda members using nerve gas? cool, it'll justify finding osama..

VeriSexy 05-17-2004 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff
Sarin Nerve Agent

So to recap:

1) Terrorists are in Iraq
2) WMD are in Iraq

Looks like Bush told the truth.


Suck a fat cock, you cross-eyed monkey-fucking leftard pieces of shit.

"In 1995, Japan's Aum Shinrikyo cult unleashed sarin gas in Tokyo's subways, killing 12 people and sickening thousands. In February of this year, Japanese courts convicted the cult's former leader, Shoko Asahara, and sentence him to be executed. "

Mass destruction? 12 people out of maybe hundreds on the train?

"Antidotes to nerve gases similar to sarin are so effective that top poison gas researchers predict they eventually will cease to be a war threat. "

Wow, looks so deadly. :1orglaugh





http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...a/iraq_sarin_4

Mike AI 05-17-2004 08:57 AM

What about the mustard gas that was found 2 weeks ago?

The Truth Hurts 05-17-2004 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by VeriSexy

Wow, looks so deadly. :1orglaugh

If one of those 12 was your mother, I'd bet you'd have a different opinion.

xenophobic 05-17-2004 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by VeriSexy
"In 1995, Japan's Aum Shinrikyo cult unleashed sarin gas in Tokyo's subways, killing 12 people and sickening thousands. In February of this year, Japanese courts convicted the cult's former leader, Shoko Asahara, and sentence him to be executed. "

Mass destruction? 12 people out of maybe hundreds on the train?

"Antidotes to nerve gases similar to sarin are so effective that top poison gas researchers predict they eventually will cease to be a war threat. "

Wow, looks so deadly. :1orglaugh



http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...a/iraq_sarin_4


You're incorrect, the problem with that attack was delivery, if the same attack had used aerosolized sarin everyone on that train would have been dead.

VeriSexy 05-17-2004 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts
If one of those 12 was your mother, I'd bet you'd have a different opinion.
Point is it's no more deadly than a AK14.

bringer 05-17-2004 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by VeriSexy
Point is it's no more deadly than a AK14.
i guess if you had enough rounds, you could kill the same amount as a nuke too

FlyingIguana 05-17-2004 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bringer
you're right. we finished searching iraq completely and only found 1 round. idiot
ill bookmark and bump this thread when they find more
then what will you say? "we only found enough to kill the state of california! hardly enough to justify a war"

this is a moronic statement. one fucking shell isn't the same as finding more. when they find enough to kill a small country then talk.

kenny 05-17-2004 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by xenophobic
You're incorrect, the problem with that attack was delivery, if the same attack had used aerosolized sarin everyone on that train would have been dead.
Correct.

VeriSexy 05-17-2004 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bringer
i guess if you had enough rounds, you could kill the same amount as a nuke too
A nuke can kill millions in a few seconds, can't really compare. With your logic, you can kill just as many with knives. Just need lot's of time :)

jas1552 05-17-2004 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by FlyingIguana
this is a moronic statement. one fucking shell isn't the same as finding more. when they find enough to kill a small country then talk.
The thing is everybody with at least half a brain knew they existed in the first place. More don't need to be found to prove their existence. The fact that Saddam used them in the past proved their existence years ago.

Buff 05-17-2004 09:09 AM

You know, Iraq admitted when Saddam's brother in law defected that they had several hundred sarin gas shells, but claim that they exploded them all. I guess they lied...

Buff 05-17-2004 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by jas1552
The thing is everybody with at least half a brain knew they existed in the first place. More don't need to be found to prove their existence. The fact that Saddam used them in the past proved their existence years ago.
No, see, there are people HERE on GFY who don't believe that -- they think he destroyed all his WMD under (get this) pressure from the UN!!!

hahahahaha


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123