![]() |
100 little aprils
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
that chick look fucking 12 or younger, i see alot of people trying to convince themselves otherwise......
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Not knowing she's 15 or 16 and she looks like a woman, I disagree. Christ, you can't tell the difference in half these kids today. |
Anyone making galleries should have a link or url to the 2257 from the sponsor site , that simple . If the sponsor site doesnt have a 2257 link then you shouldnt be promoting it .
http://www.littleapril.com/18usc.html This isnt fucking brain surgery ...... |
smart idea
|
She does look super young. Maybe its the braces. I believe of course she is legal, but shes just to damn young looking and the domian name don't help, for me at least.
|
so oraclepig when are you finally leaving GFY?
|
hard to believe they don't keep up with stuff
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
120
people are slowwww today:( |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
doubt triplexcash would have an underage site...just because she looks young doesn't mean she is under 18
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
you seem to be obsessed with oracle, maybe the 2 of you should both leave |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I wonder how many CP complainments triplexcash allready got because of their little april site, even though she's legal.
|
Quote:
|
did all the *** reps disappear from this thread?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Amazing. |
That chick doesn't look underage.
|
Quote:
lol i hate that dude :winkwink: |
Seems little April might be a bit too much bother. I reckon I'll stay clear of it for now.
|
The only unbelievable thing is the lack of regular gfy posters that didn't condemn this site when it was launched two weeks ago on this board. There are certainly hundreds of people who feel the same way, but didn't post because they were afraid. That original thread"Is She Even Legal?" had very few negative comments?
Someone said something about splitting hairs? Defining pedo may be splitting hairs but my post was not. I believe she is legal, so if they were investigated they would be right with the law. But she looks 13 and they produced the site to make that reality come across. This site looks, sounds, and feels like child porn. She looks like a child and not old enough to pose nude. There is not a grey area with anything said above. A question for adult webmasters: Is it okay for legitamate pornographers to produce legal websites of models who look underage and promote that reality indirectly to surfers? I think more than half of folks would say stay away from sites like little april. How does a program that has (CFF) one of the most popular websites in the history of universe get to little april?:1orglaugh They clearly made a mistake and should focus on coming up with the next great reality site. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123