GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Nobody likes Lara Roxx (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=293228)

beergood 05-13-2004 08:32 AM

She's got horse face.......but......you don't fuck her face. I (would've) hit it.

johndoebob 05-13-2004 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ParasiteTV
whoa.

i can't belive the shit you guys are talking. leave the chick alone: ugly this, nasty that... I wonder what you all look like, seeing that you have to pay chicks to be within 2 ft of your fat asses, I'd presume you ain't much better off.

secondly i think i should be illegal to shoot no-condom porn, and if lara can bring this up, all the more power to her.

I hope she sues: coersion, no-condoms; endangerment, et al.
I hope she wins.

Mate if you ain't got a clue - stfu,kthx bye :thumbsup

To get it straight again.She says lots of bullshit,she's damn retarded,it doesn't matter how I look like cause I ain't getting payed to fuck.She thinks she's a star,looks good and can piss everybody off but in fact she is ugly,nobody wanted to book her and she did everything to get some cash.

If you work with or without condoms is your own decision and if you don't ask for hiv tests it's your own fault.

BVF 05-13-2004 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ParasiteTV

secondly i think i should be illegal to shoot no-condom porn, and if lara can bring this up, all the more power to her.

This must be coming from a NON-pornographer.

ParasiteTV 05-13-2004 08:49 AM

actually i've shot porn content, and ALWAYS had the actors use condoms.

HIV testing is not always accurate: example: I get tested, comes back negative on monday... my shoot is on friday... between monday and friday i sleep with 4 people...

thats why its imperative to always use condoms.

i think not using condoms is equal to doctors not sterilizing their instruments. and those who coerce their actors not to use condoms should be held responsible for infections just as people in the medical industry are held responsible for disease transmission.

Monique Niccole 05-13-2004 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ParasiteTV
I hope she sues: coersion, no-condoms; endangerment, et al.
I hope she wins.

that would be a bullshit suit. ever heard of "free will"?

ParasiteTV 05-13-2004 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Afrekete
that would be a bullshit suit. ever heard of "free will"?
ever heard of coersion? ever heard of taking advantage of mentally unstable individuals?

Monique Niccole 05-13-2004 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ParasiteTV
ever heard of coersion? ever heard of taking advantage of mentally unstable individuals?
She's your average unstable girl...there are thousands of them out there -- in porn and not in porn. Unless she's deemed mentally unstable or a mentally challenged retard, then there's no reason why anyone should think she's been taken advantage of.

Would the government come to your rescue if you decided to fuck someone (off-camera, totally consensual) and you happened to get HIV? NO.

CDSmith 05-13-2004 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ParasiteTV
ever heard of coersion? ever heard of taking advantage of mentally unstable individuals?
You should quit porn and become a lawyer.

ParasiteTV 05-13-2004 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Afrekete
She's your average unstable girl...there are thousands of them out there -- in porn and not in porn. Unless she's deemed mentally unstable or a mentally challenged retard, then there's no reason why anyone should think she's been taken advantage of.

Would the government come to your rescue if you decided to fuck someone (off-camera, totally consensual) and you happened to get HIV? NO.

No but proven that she was a drug addict, needed cash, and that the company coerced her to do the scene, ie: double anal, without condoms, or no deal..

things can get pretty messy.

CDSmith 05-13-2004 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ParasiteTV
No but proven that she was a drug addict, needed cash, and that the company coerced her to do the scene, ie: double anal, without condoms, or no deal..

things can get pretty messy.

Where exactly did you hear about the "coersion", or from whom?


I suggested there <i>MAY</i> have been some persuasion or coersion going on in her case, back when the story first broke. I was suggesting it as a possibility only, and a few guys who seemed to be in-the-know about her case came on and said flat-out that there was no coersion that they knew of.

I'd like to know where you're getting this knowledge or what you are basing your posts on.

Jaden 05-13-2004 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ParasiteTV
No but proven that she was a drug addict, needed cash, and that the company coerced her to do the scene, ie: double anal, without condoms, or no deal..

things can get pretty messy.

And there it is....or no deal. SHE is the one who put the price tag on her life. She wasn't physically restrained and helped captive being forced to do it. She could have made the decision to put a higher price on her life and walked out. It was still her choice. And I know for me...short of putting a gun to my head, or a knife to my throat there is little in this world that would get me to take that gamble.

Easton 05-13-2004 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ajpiii
she isnt that hot, he claim to fame is what happend to her, and if you dont know who she is why would ya click
agreed

ParasiteTV 05-13-2004 09:42 AM

Take a step back for 1 minute.

Would you push a young girl to do a double anal with no condoms, knowing that your major male actor just spent time in brazil shooting no condom content?

Think for 1 minute and stop being such idiotic keyboard warriors.

Ofcourse she has some blame, afterall she made the desicion to do the scene, but come on. There is definate blame to be laid on all the assholes in this biz that don't give a fuck about anyone's safty just as long as they make a profit.

If it was your sister, your daughter, I'm sure you'd see things a little differently.

C-Bass 05-13-2004 09:45 AM

Those have to be the shittiest 15 minutes of fame ever.....

johndoebob 05-13-2004 09:49 AM

She could've asked him about a HIV test,she didn't do that.She wanted the money.

Quote:

If it was your sister, your daughter, I'm sure you'd see things a little differently.
I'm taking this quote from another thread as the answer.

Quote:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Brat
you wouldnt be saying the same thing if it happened to someone you loved so please...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Maybe. But I don't think I could love someone THIS stupid.

Ie.: My younger brother is a total idiot: He is a junky, he is a thieve, (robbed my father many times ) he is a lyer, all he is good at is making trouble.

I don't talk with him anymore and I don't see him anymore.

He would die tomorrow and I woudn't care.

candyflip 05-13-2004 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
Where exactly did you hear about the "coersion", or from whom?


I suggested there <i>MAY</i> have been some persuasion or coersion going on in her case, back when the story first broke. I was suggesting it as a possibility only, and a few guys who seemed to be in-the-know about her case came on and said flat-out that there was no coersion that they knew of.

I'd like to know where you're getting this knowledge or what you are basing your posts on.

If I'm not mistaken...he has mentioned here before that he was once friends with her or he has worked with her in the past.

cosis 05-13-2004 10:49 AM

Something about a girl with AIDS just turns me off

Easton 05-13-2004 11:00 AM

well it always comes down to $ with the girls

ie. a girl says "i never swallow" , but you offer her an extra $100 to eat the load from the stunt cock and she goes "OK"

how do you explain that?

davidd 05-13-2004 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ChrisExtreme
If McDoanlds can get sued and lose because the coffee is too hot then I'm sure a hiv infected pornstar can sue someone and win.

:2 cents:

A person goes into a restaurant with the assumption they are to be fed food and drink. If you ever saw what happened to the woman you would no longer use that as an example. The woman had her inner thighs completely removed of their flesh. She needed skin grafts from crotch to knee. If this happened to your grandmother would you still use it as a 'stupid lawsuit'?

A person can not expect to go into a double anal scene with any expectations of a 'good outcome'.

I personally am waiting for this to go to court so it can be determined who truly was 'Patient Zero'.

-dd

Shoehorn! 05-13-2004 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SYNIKAL
She wanted to take double anal, she is her own fault... She shoulda taken percautions... She didnt, so her lawsuit is BULLSHIT and should be thrown out
I agree. :2 cents:

johndoebob 05-13-2004 11:35 AM

Quote:

If this happened to your grandmother would you still use it as a 'stupid lawsuit'?
Geez why does everybody come up with those personal crap.It's not about my granny it's about Lara. :2 cents:

Quote:

A person can not expect to go into a double anal scene with any expectations of a 'good outcome'.
If you are a pro it's no problem,take Katja Kassin for example.

ParasiteTV 05-13-2004 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Easton
well it always comes down to $ with the girls

ie. a girl says "i never swallow" , but you offer her an extra $100 to eat the load from the stunt cock and she goes "OK"

how do you explain that?

they're desperate for cash. desperate people do desperate things.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123