Ridiculous. Some offshore companies are gonna make bank filling the hole this creates.

The pros outweigh the cons .. this is a good thing. :thumbsup

*edit, added thumbsup

I'm not sure what you mean here. If you're implying that offshore=no censorship, I disagree.


We've seen a dramatic increase in conversions once we censored tours (spunkmouth.com and soon JOMG.com) and kept the guys from jacking to completion with the tour

With the current administration, it's very, very smart to censor...especially if you're a paysite owner.

Win-Win all the way around...

that censoring is weak at best. Not only does it not really censor much of anything, but it's a most lame way of doing it.

if you're going to censor, at least do a professional job of it. :2 cents:

covering the good bits helps on my tours but I don't do such hardcore sites.

http://www.blacksonblondes.com/newma...rooklyn/09.jpg

lol

Who are you kidding with those little stars.. or the lack of it..?

agreed.


IF bob is ever busted and shit like this is put in front of a jury the obvious response is the same as this poster.

who are they kidding? cover a labia, but leave an asshole?

come on!

if you really want to be proactive and keep the smut away from folks who don't want it, and allow parents to keep their kids off your shit you need to label your sites (ICRA).

at least then no one can say your didn't make an effort.

this sort of censoring will mostly just piss some members of a jury off.

true, it may increase conversions, but this will not keep the heat off.

censored tours sucks :(

I like censored tours myself.. when done correctly. :2 cents:

He's not censoring nudity, he's just censoring the sex.

50 censored tours :glugglug

If you're gonna censor tours then you have to censor galleries as well.

is a good idea :2 cents:

All tours I've pushed have been censored, so I wouldn't really know.

WG

http://www.darkcavern.com isn't censored yet and it converts EXTREMELY WELL on the same type of traffic as BoB.

Lensman, I asked your guys to send me an invoice for a May advertising package for the cavern and I even had a $300.00 contest to have the banner made, I never got the invoice.

I'm still interested.

Imagine the extra money we would all be making if that happens
:glugglug

exactly, why bother censoring anything on that site?

Censored galleries... hmmmm

may not be as stupid as it sounds....


stroke of genius, actually.


Depends on how you USE it :winkwink: :thumbsup

You aren't censoring shit if you are promoting his reality sites. I sat in JB's office and listened to him tell me about not wanting to risk anything by showing penetration on the tours, then I launched a trailer with an Asian girl taking it in the ass.

We'll see if it helps our ratios. :Graucho

awesomely censored i have to say

load the flash on:
from http://www.blacksonblondes.com/tour2/download.php?rid=a

and i downloaded the first trailer
cmon guys
dont tell me he is doing it to avoid legal problems
:1orglaugh

just download it and see yourself!

What the F*$k !!!!

You guys are talking about censoring a tour when the majority of affiliates are banging out 100's of Galleries that show full penetration and a whole lot more !! Surely the surfer (possibly under 18 !!) has "knocked one off" over one of your galleries, before they have even reached your site ?

When Paysites decide to drastically reduce the amount of free Hardcore Galleries that they offer to their affiliates etc.., then I feel the "legal" censorship of a Tour should be an issue.

Surely the same legal issues apply with a sites tour and their promotional material ?

just my :2 cents: