anti-porn activist email dialogue

[xenigo]

You obviously don't understand that art is a subjective term, used differently by everyone. I hardly think you stand qualilified to determine the definition of "art". Your art, is everyone else's sleaze, garbage, shit etc... keep that in mind.

And why do you keep using the term "we", as if you speak for all of society. You're speaking for yourself. If you don't agree with it, that's perfectly fine, but don't get up on your high horse and act like you speak for everyone.

The adult industry is one of the largest in existence, and has been around since the beginning of mankind. If you look at the fact that it's a billion dollar industry, I think you will find that society does indeed agree with pornography.


mel little <[email protected]> wrote:
How come everytime someone tries to get the sleazey
post out of the arts section, because they don't
belong there, dirtbags like you think it's religeos,
prudish, censorship, etc, etc.

we just are sick of sleazy shits like you who think
porn is the same as sexuality. your version of
sexuality perhaps. but at any rate you're posting in
the wrong location, so get used to being flagged, you
moron.

by the way the correct spelling is "holy" moron



--- Noah Couchot wrote:
>
> PaintGirl,
> It would be interesting to know what qualifies you
> to make such statements. Would it be that you go to
> church, and you're somehow more holey, or closer to
> God than us "sleaze"? Please learn that you're not
> in any way above the rest of society. If you do, by
> any chance, think that you're somehow above us for
> the reasons of religion, you need to take into
> account that most of the conflict of the world is
> caused by religion, and this world is not the
> peaceful place you like to pretend it is, because of
> that fact. Religious wars, wars over holey land...
> are some of the most violent things I've ever
> witnessed. Until you can say that you don't believe
> in the gruesom killing and wars that are celebrated
> by religion, I hardly think you stand qualified to
> judge others for visually expressing human
> sexuality. To call yourself "moral", and someone
> that doesn't agree with you "immoral" is hypocrital
> by definition, because of your conflicted religious
> perspectives.
>
> God created sexuality and the female form, right? So
> I'd like to hear your argument about why sexuality
> is such a bad thing, or why it should be hidden, and
> kept secret. Seriously, if you actually have
> something intelligent to say, I'd like to hear it.
> Don?t bother if all you can give me is mindless
> drivel.
>
> Honestly I think you should grow out of mid-evil
> times and come into the year 2004, where sexuality
> is celebrated and not something to be ashamed of.
> Pornography is the least of society's problems, and
> by telling us we don't have a right to produce it
> only makes you look like an ignorant jackass.
>
> -Noah
>
>
>
> > -------------------------------------
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "mel little"
>
> To:
>
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 9:54 PM
>
> Subject: pornographer go away
>
>
>
> > you have no business being in the CL art section,
> you
>
> > sleaze.
>
> >
>
> > Photographer seeks paid nude female models
>
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Reply to:
> > Date: 2004-05-06, 9:24PM PDT
>
> >
>
> > My company is looking for attractive women 18-25
> to
>
> > pose for very tasteful nude photos. The images
> will be
>
> > used for high-end adult websites. You will be paid
> up
>
> > to $1,000 for a 5 hour shoot. Please send an
> e-mail
>
> > with clear photos of yourself and contact
> information.

[hottshot]

just send them here www.pornactivists.com