Its simple.......

Oral sex is less risky than vaginal/anal sex.

Of course the only real safe sex is no sex....... but that would be boring so we have opt for just "safER sex"

and JDog..... sorry but u are just plain wrong :)

umm thats easy so she wont get pregnant. but yeah by doing that it can lead to HIV infection anyways

Isn't that what I just said?

*sigh*

:1orglaugh

Sorry Elli, didnt mean to ignore your post. Just didnt realize you were talking to the same person becuase you didnt quote, but yes, I basically said similar to what you said. :)

That's ok. I'll swallow the pain and struggle gamely on. :1orglaugh

looks like everything has already been said... well I guess some safety is better than none...

Have you ever seen anyone eat pussy through a dental dam?

I have on a set and it looks soooo stupid. :1orglaugh

Why not wear a condom during oral sex with a stranger? Let?s just say the female is positive and has some open soars in her mouth, she is giving a blow job and one thrust is to hard so she chokes and happens to clamp her jaws and on the dick happens to be bitten but he still shoots his load all over her face.

Wearing the condom even though she bit the dick gives one a fighting chance that the dick didn?t come in contact with her open soars.

Sorry to be so graphic but the ignorance about aids on this board is so stupid. Without sounding like some other people on this board, the minimum wage is what 6-7 dollars an hour without the risk of getting aids and what is the hourly rate to fuck for money.

Before you flame me, I am just trying to say content has risks involved and should really educate themselves because their health/life is involved.

You thought right. Preventing infection and pregnancy....
my God! Did you live under a rock or something?

This is SO obvious

50 vd's

All your Sex Education questions can be answered here:

http://www.sexeducation.com

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

"In laboratory studies, various factors involving saliva have been found to have either a direct effect, or an indirect effect, against the HIV virus in vitro (in a test tube). Some of these factors include secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI), thrombospondin (TSP), mucins, virus-specific antibodies, hypotonic disruption of HIV infected cells inside saliva, and other factors.

What does all this mean in real life situations? These factors may explain why the concentrations of HIV in saliva are so low. Since the concentrations of HIV in saliva are so low, activities involving saliva (such as kissing and receiving oral sex) are extremely low risk for HIV (as long as the saliva is not visibly contaminated with blood). "

so they cant get DNA evidence