So it is. She took the risk getting HIV infected, the industry took the risk getting bad publicity if she was infected. But shouldn´t have the industry better done to advise her not being risky?

We don´t know anything. Neither how she get along with her situation nor how that "interview" was done. But the story is her only opportunity to make money now. And be honest, it´s all about money. Or is there a porn wellfare site which offers content for free to the poor?

hahaha...

.

everybody reacts to things differently... who is to say what a right or wrong reaction to something is? just because she wants money doesnt mean shes going to lie... as for who gave who what? i dont know... thats not really the issue here, unless you are inclined to try and judge this girl

""I am not going to answer any questions," Roxx said in a thick Canadian accent. "But if you ask questions about asking me questions then I'm willing to answer those questions. But if you want to make some kind of money with my life and make it a story, I need to..."

Whoever whote this article is an idiot. A frenchie from quebec is hardly representing of a candian accent. There is no such thing as a canadian accent. Jesus, what are you people taught in school?

That's not her only opportunity to make money, she can get a job. She goes back to canada, there is free health care and she can work. Millions of people arent in porn and make a living.

She's probably keeping it all in. But I think she should get as much money out of this as possible. To pay for her medical bills.

She is from Canada health care is free , no medical bills not like USA.

Of course she can. But I didn´t know that there is free healthcare in Canada. I´m from Europe and so I´m not informed about that.

But I thought of making money now. She went to LA making money by doing porn. I´m afraid her motivation wasn´t being so horny. Now she tries to make some money on interviews. I admit I wouldn´t think different in that situation.

youd think more aids infected americans would move to canada if that were an absolute.

What's the focus on the double anal thing here for? Hell, maybe she likes it, we don't know...

Every performer decides what they will and won't do on camera just like every person decides what they will or won't do in real life. If someone suggested double anal to me I'd laugh at their audacity, but then again if someone said they wanted to tie me up and cum on my face, I'd laugh at that too.

The girls bound to be in shock, scared and feeling very lonely right now, regardless of who she knows or doesn't know. And I'd imagine every other person on the first, second or third gen list has to be a total wreck right now too.

Sorry but you're talking out of your ass. She can visit a doctor for free. BUT the drugs that she is going to need every single day for the rest of her life are no more free here than they are in the US.

It is :( taken from http://www.civitas.org.uk/pdf/Canada.pdf)

Background Briefing: The Canadian Health Care System By Benedict Irvine and Shannon Ferguson. This briefing is based on a report by Stephen Pollard, which was commissioned by Civitas in 2002. Health care in Canada has long been a source of national pride. Known as ?medicare?, the system is publicly financed but privately run, it provides universal coverage and care is free at the point of use. The system is based on five founding principles. Care must be universal, portable, comprehensive, accessible, and publicly administered. But does medicare adhere to these principles? Many think not. Ten Systems and Five Founding Principles: The Development of Medicare Canada?s version of national public health insurance is characterised by local control, doctor autonomy and consumer choice ? patients theoretically have a free choice of physician and hospital. (Kraker, 2002). The ten provincial governments are the key providers of health care, having the constitutional responsibility for planning, financing, and evaluating the provision of hospital care, negotiating salaries of health professionals and negotiating fees for physician services. The result is that each provincial insurance plan differs slightly ? mostly in how far each extends public insurance coverage beyond medically necessary hospital and physician services (Kraker, 2002).

Damn straight. I've seen certain drugs cost over $300 a pill here. If you're in the hospital as a patient it's all free, but once you are discharged you're on your own unless your insurance plan has some benefits for prescription drugs.

I read somewhere that the drug cocktails will cost around 10-15k per year to prolong life for someone who is hiv positive. It will cost around 10-15k to add an additional year of healthy life to someone with HIV. Unfortunately it appears that people will more money get the better end of the deal :(

The only thing I learned from that article is that Gene Ross is an idiot.

Sounds like a smart girl to me.

Taken from : http://www.gpiatlantic.org/releases/pr_cost_aids.shtml

"Rather than becoming complacent about HIV/AIDS dues to successes at home, it is incumbent upon Canada and other wealthy nations to apply their successful experience abroad, to provide the necessary resources for education and prevention in developing nations, and to facilitate the low-cost provision of drugs that can assist HIV patients to manage the disease successfully. That assistance should not be regarded as a "cost," but as an "investment" that will reduce the appalling costs of the disease and has already been proven to do so in Canada."

I can only tell you by what I read ,I didnt make this up.