GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   twin towers were brought down by explosive devices (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=266350)

rett11 04-09-2004 06:57 AM

this is a pretty funny thread!!

erehwon 04-09-2004 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lane
dont know about the twin towers, but building 6 going down was complete bullshit.. there wasnt any serious fire in there and nothing hit that building.. since when do steel building collapse just because of fire?
I think you are getting your towers confused.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...236nov29.story

"Most of the three other buildings in the complex, 4, 5 and 6 World Trade, remained standing despite suffering damage of all kinds, including fire. Still, experts concede, in a hellish day, 7 World Trade might have sustained structural injuries never envisioned in fire codes."

If you were talking about WTC 7, the reason I have heard from several sources was the number of diesel storage tanks for generating electricity on fire was the root cause of the collapse of the building.

But belive what you want, maybe this will help you with the voices from your showerhead, dog, mercury tooth fillings, etc.

Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie :1orglaugh :Graucho :1orglaugh

icedemon 04-09-2004 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SS396chevelleSS

read the thread for the motive, I already said it

I read the thread twice and don't see where you talk about a motive.

icedemon 04-09-2004 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SS396chevelleSS

Besides, why would it take alot of jackhammering to get the explosives set right.. a plane in the side of a building levels it perfectly every time? why have we wasted so much research on controlled destruction.. we could have just ran planes into everything we wanna knock down!

If you set alot of small exploives to take down a building, the explosives need to be put into the structure itself (right into the framework). You cann't just tape a bunch of small explosives to a build and hope it brings it down. To take down a building, you need to make holes in the framework and set the explosives in those holes. Therefore jackhammering comes into play.

You can cause damage to a building by just taping the explosives. But it's harder to take the building down if the explosives were just held in place instead of place with in the framework. I learned this from watch how they setup buildings to be taken down by explosives on tv. So I could be wrong on all of this.

spamofon 04-09-2004 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DavePlays


Now if you will excuse me, I have a tin-foil hat to make.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

WarChild 04-09-2004 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SS396chevelleSS

but the upper sections came down as a whole, the lowers blew up, the jet fuel was burning, where does heat go? oh yeah UP that should have caused the upper sections to FALL OVER if anything not fall through a solid building

A structure so tall and heavy could not POSSIBLY fall OVER. Gravity is too strong of a force. It would fall straight down, like it did.

baddog 04-09-2004 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SS396chevelleSS
there is no way in hell BOTH of thos buildings would come straight down like they did. There were Explosives, The gov't knew these buildings would be hit before they were. It was our Government that brought down those buildings. They would have stood:2 cents:
and you got your engineering degree from a box of Cracker Jack or Lego?

Doctor Dre 04-09-2004 12:48 PM

1st fireman: "It was as if they had detonators,"


IF they had ...

Maybe the building wasn't as safe as they tought!

baddog 04-09-2004 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MattO
Explosive Devices=Planes full of jet fuel
ah, there is intelligent life on this planet

baddog 04-09-2004 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SS396chevelleSS

not fall through a solid building

A solid building? We are not talking a pile of stacked bricks here. Ever heard of office space?

baddog 04-09-2004 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fabien
Vegas 2003
1715 posts

spanky part 2:
63 posts

Priceless
:1orglaugh

Don't let post counts sway you. Obviously spanky part 2 has a little more on the ball than does Vegas 2003.

baddog 04-09-2004 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Battuss
And another worthless vegas2003 thread. That guy has mental problems. And his friends as well.
You think his friends are "real?"

Xplicit 04-09-2004 12:55 PM

THE ALIENS ARE COMING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

gregtx 04-09-2004 01:00 PM

this is exactly why not everyone should be allowed to vote ;)

psyko514 04-09-2004 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog


You think his friends are "real?"


lol... i doubt it!

liquidmoe 04-09-2004 02:16 PM

What happened to Enron, who was inedited. Oh wait, all news of Enron disappeared after the towers collapsed. What happened to the financial hahahahahahahahas, oh wait, those were stored in Building 7.

You want a motive, how's a few million ?

You have to stop thinking of these things as conspiracies and other b.s., but think of it from a monetary standpoint, who has to gain from the collapse, and who has to lose. And since their collapse, who did lose, besides the individual families, I dont really hear much about the fall out. But the gains are huge, we goto war = very profitable, we rebuild = profitable, we clean up = profitable.

Could be wrong, just a thought. But if you believe everything the government tells you, well then there is really no point in voting or voicing your opinions, just let the government do that for you.

Vic Lagina 04-09-2004 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SS396chevelleSS
there is no way in hell BOTH of thos buildings would come straight down like they did. There were Explosives, The gov't knew these buildings would be hit before they were. It was our Government that brought down those buildings. They would have stood:2 cents:
Where can I score some of the shit you're on?

icedemon 04-09-2004 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by liquidmoe
What happened to Enron, who was inedited. Oh wait, all news of Enron disappeared after the towers collapsed. What happened to the financial hahahahahahahahas, oh wait, those were stored in Building 7.

You want a motive, how's a few million ?

You have to stop thinking of these things as conspiracies and other b.s., but think of it from a monetary standpoint, who has to gain from the collapse, and who has to lose. And since their collapse, who did lose, besides the individual families, I dont really hear much about the fall out. But the gains are huge, we goto war = very profitable, we rebuild = profitable, we clean up = profitable.

Could be wrong, just a thought. But if you believe everything the government tells you, well then there is really no point in voting or voicing your opinions, just let the government do that for you.

So the plane that went down in the field and the one into the pentagon had to do with Enron to? Nohahahaha believes everything the government feeds them. But nohahahaha believes that killing a bunch of people and causing a couple million (or billion) dollars worth of damage to just coverup something about Enron makes sense. You have got to be kidding me if you actually believe what you just wrote.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123