| xxxdesign-net |
03-21-2004 09:54 AM |
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
Making an XXX extension doesn't take away the government's interest in censoring porn, nothing does that. Do you think the justice department will suddenly like porn because it's on a .xxx domain? That's is ridiculous. It just makes it much easier to censor adult content. Look at what has been happening with Visa and Mastercard. Do you believe that the government has no influence over decisions that private companies make?
By making a mandatory .xxx extension, you are giving the government all the tools they need to shut down all adult content on the internet by putting pressure on private companies to block access to .xxx domains.
|
You are paranoiac really..
The concept of putting porn on a specific extension like .xxx already exist... its called specialized channels on cable TV or pay per view.. is the US government tring to shut them down!?? NO.... !!!!!!!!!!! You are dreaming if you think the US governmnet will outlaw porn sites on a .xxx extension...! THey would have NO argument in court....
As for Visa and Mastercard.. now you are into conspiracy theories first... second.. if thats the case... the government's arguments will not have as much weight to them if all adult sites are on .xxx extensions.. since it will be now easy controlled by adults/parents.... like cable TV is... The government do NOTHING about that!
Quote:
Even if the government didn't do anything, can't you imagine AOL, Earthlink, and others deciding that .xxx should be blocked because a few right wing idiots threaten to boycott? Look what happened with Janet's boob on the superbowl. Why do you think that the right wing wouldn't force every major ISP to block .xxx?
|
lol please... an easy answer for those right wingers is put your .xxx filter on... case closed... can you imagine the Boycot threaths millions and millions of pistoff users and those that care about free speech will give to those companies.!??!? The Janet Jackson exemple is not good for this situation....
Quote:
Who decides what is on .xxx? The government? Do you think that softcore should be on .xxx? What about bikini content? What about GFY?
Why not just support a .kids extension and let adults enjoy the full internet? The internet is not intended for children unsupervised. It never was and it never will be. If you want to make the entire internet kid friendly, because you are too lazy to monitor your children, then you are destroying the entire interet and killing free speech.
|
Who decides? Who decides whats blocked on netnanny!? HOw Visa decide that you have an adult site?
If you have an adult site.. selling stimulation for you to rub one out... you should be on .xxx
ANd the .kids... thats the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard... what about teens from 12 to 17yo.. ?! Should they only be able to surf on .kids sites !? LOL |
