US, UK to crackdown on porn - GoFuckYourself.com

Roger · 03-11-2004, 03:35 AM

Quote:

LONDON - In the wake of a man being sentenced to life for killing a teacher after he visited Websites featuring necrophilia and "other extreme sexual activity," law enforcement in Great Britain and the United States plan a joint crackdown on such Websites ? and a few players in the U.S. adult Internet are not exactly unhappy about it.

Free speech be damned hey.

Mr.Fiction · 03-11-2004, 05:45 AM

"I guess The Catcher In The Rye should be banned, too, on the same criteria," said Chicago-based attorney J.D. Obenberger, alluding to the long-controversial J.D. Salinger novel often targeted by censorship supporters and, most notoriously, in the possession of the man who murdered former Beatle John Lennon in 1980. "I guess the thinking goes, any sensory stimulation that is received within a couple of hours before some criminal commits a crime should be banned," he said. "And, then, we'd have no crime. Of course, we'd have no literature, either."

http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary...ntent_ID=76807

Shoehorn! · 03-11-2004, 05:50 AM

Complete bullshit. Movies, TV, Music, the Internet or any form of media DOES NOT influence people. If people do something that they see on TV, the internet, hear in a song, etc., they were fucked up beforehand and should be sent away. More regulations are bullshit.

Observing · 03-11-2004, 05:51 AM

Feel free to come a crackin

{fusion} · 03-11-2004, 05:54 AM

in the 70's there were films like game of death, animal farm, and many others that were a million times worse than any porn site.

Roger · 03-11-2004, 05:57 AM

US being the biggest exporter of torture devices poses no harm, nothing to see. But a couple of criminals out of 6 billion people who happened to view porn during the time they committed there crime is a huge deal; and porn sites are to blame

What kind of thinking is that?

=^..^= · 03-11-2004, 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
"I guess The Catcher In The Rye should be banned, too, on the same criteria," said Chicago-based attorney J.D. Obenberger, alluding to the long-controversial J.D. Salinger novel often targeted by censorship supporters and, most notoriously, in the possession of the man who murdered former Beatle John Lennon in 1980. "I guess the thinking goes, any sensory stimulation that is received within a couple of hours before some criminal commits a crime should be banned," he said. "And, then, we'd have no crime. Of course, we'd have no literature, either."

Again JD is right

how many people killed after reading the bible?
they havent banned THAT yet

Firehorse · 03-11-2004, 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by =^..^=

Again JD is right

how many people killed after reading the bible?
they havent banned THAT yet

Some would say that is blasphemous!

03-11-2004, 05:45 AM	#2
Mr.Fiction Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Free Speech Land Posts: 9,484	"I guess The Catcher In The Rye should be banned, too, on the same criteria," said Chicago-based attorney J.D. Obenberger, alluding to the long-controversial J.D. Salinger novel often targeted by censorship supporters and, most notoriously, in the possession of the man who murdered former Beatle John Lennon in 1980. "I guess the thinking goes, any sensory stimulation that is received within a couple of hours before some criminal commits a crime should be banned," he said. "And, then, we'd have no crime. Of course, we'd have no literature, either." http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary...ntent_ID=76807 __________________ Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU \| Free Speech Coalition \| EFF \| IMPA

03-11-2004, 05:50 AM	#3
Shoehorn! Die With Your Boots On Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Hawaii Posts: 22,872	Complete bullshit. Movies, TV, Music, the Internet or any form of media DOES NOT influence people. If people do something that they see on TV, the internet, hear in a song, etc., they were fucked up beforehand and should be sent away. More regulations are bullshit. __________________

03-11-2004, 05:51 AM	#4
Observing Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 809	Feel free to come a crackin __________________ ICQ: 278-457-533

03-11-2004, 05:54 AM	#5
{fusion} Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,650	in the 70's there were films like game of death, animal farm, and many others that were a million times worse than any porn site.

03-11-2004, 05:57 AM	#6
Roger Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: MetroCity Posts: 3,181	US being the biggest exporter of torture devices poses no harm, nothing to see. But a couple of criminals out of 6 billion people who happened to view porn during the time they committed there crime is a huge deal; and porn sites are to blame What kind of thinking is that?