GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   2005 Chevy Camero! (Pics) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=249770)

Veterans Day 03-10-2004 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by iroc409


bingo.


and i don't think the mustang is a total piece of crap, although i'm not a ford fan and would never own one. i just prefer the chevy.

i used to hang out with a couple mustang familes, they mostly had first gens. in fact, one had a completely beautiful 68 mustang. it was an awesome restore. unfortunately, it was a dog. he put a truck crate 302 in it with an edelbrock dual-4bbl. the carbs killed it so much it spits raw fuel out the tailpipes, even with a reduction linkage to the 2nd card :):)

ya no shit dual quads on a crate small block is a joke. Dual quads on 500 inches and over with heads minimum.

iroc409 03-10-2004 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Veterans Day
ya no shit dual quads on a crate small block is a joke. Dual quads on 500 inches and over with heads minimum.

but you have to admit, dual quads on anything looks damn cool :)


if i remember my math, a holley 850 will run a 302 to like 8000 rpm or something... lol. so many people use so much overkill on their motors :)

bryany 03-11-2004 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by iroc409



but you have to admit, dual quads on anything looks damn cool :)

:thumbsup

Mr. Marks 03-11-2004 11:30 PM

50 thumbs up!:thumbsup

Veterans Day 03-11-2004 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by iroc409



but you have to admit, dual quads on anything looks damn cool :)


if i remember my math, a holley 850 will run a 302 to like 8000 rpm or something... lol. so many people use so much overkill on their motors :)

no way 650 with vacuum secondarys on a small block anything under 400 inches with stock heads, anything bigger and it will be a pig. :glugglug
http://www.feetfantasys.com/hataks707.jpg
Heres one we built 3 years ago with dual quads 707 inch

buddyjuf 03-11-2004 11:36 PM

fucking wow~!

Homegrownvideo 03-12-2004 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by iroc409
for those who want to know, the production of the F body was actually stopped not necessarily due to GM's direct decision to remove the camaro, but due to the fact that they had to close the canadian plant that _produces_ the camaro.

the reason the mustang outsold the camaro is simple. it was a cheap car. you could get into a basic v6 manual stripped mustang cheaper than a base-model camaro. and everyone from 16 y.o. girls to great grandmas were (are) getting in on the action. hell, some families would buy several at a time. and why not get a piece of american history for each kid when it's cheaper than a new corolla?

with the extra price of the camaro generally came extra performance. and the sad part is, it wasn't a whole lot more expensive :(

they're both nice cars tho, and i hope the camaro makes a comeback. GM has been replacing it with things like the GTO, SSR (which is a pretty nice replacement, but not the same), and they've got a new roadster concept that could be promising. they even thought about bringing back the bel-air with a mucho retardo I-5 turbo and a body that looked like a cross of a late-model malibu and a poor attempt at retro 57 bel-air convertible. but i see gmc is making a truck with an i-5 now :)

in my opinion, over the years, from best to worst, i'd rank it the models this way:

1 - 1st generation
2- 3rd generation (i'm biased ;) )
3 - 4.5 generation

and #4 is tied between 2nd generation and early 4th gens. i've never been a fan of the 2nd gens, but the nasty "geo" front end and ugly wheels they slapped on most 4th gens really made it a poor looker. although some of the slp units with racing strupes and 5-spoke vette wheels looked fairly decent, the rest sucked (even the colors weren't that great on most).

and if anyone's else is wondering, that color combo on the green is a classic color as well :)

Interesting. From what I heard, the 4th gen f-body didn't meet 2003 crash standards. That, mixed with poor sales, (Suv's totally outsold them) Chevy discontinued them.

Real shame. With the underestimated HP the LS1 camaros put out, (98+) they were said to be the best performance-dollar car out on the market.

I'd agree, from all i've read at ls1tech.com.

High Quality 03-12-2004 12:18 AM

That car looks totally crazy. :thumbsup

High Quality 03-12-2004 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Veterans Day
no way 650 with vacuum secondarys on a small block anything under 400 inches with stock heads, anything bigger and it will be a pig. :glugglug
http://www.feetfantasys.com/hataks707.jpg
Heres one we built 3 years ago with dual quads 707 inch

:eek2

johnbosh 03-12-2004 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fu-Q
i like this front better:

http://hp-car.com/images/0309phr-5camaro04_z.jpg

w00t

exspamr 03-12-2004 12:33 AM

its not a real design, some kid made it... see this article

Joetanto 03-12-2004 12:35 AM

looks like a vet

pimplink 03-12-2004 01:50 AM

I've been dreaming for that kind of car!

skiv 03-12-2004 03:26 AM

Why does it burn when I pee?

pornojail 03-12-2004 03:58 AM

hot , realy hot !

goth 03-12-2004 05:14 AM

now it's my favorite car

http://hp-car.com/images/0309phr-5camaro04_z.jpg

boris77 03-12-2004 05:21 AM

more style, more class than that pimpcar i've see in another topic:winkwink:

bryany 03-12-2004 12:44 PM

even if these pics are just created, it still would/is going to be a kick ass car :)

They gotta come back with the Camaro

JohnnyPearl 03-12-2004 01:58 PM

That is one badass looking Camaro. If they came out with that one I would think about buying. Myself I'm a huge Mustang fan.. I own a 92 with 350HP. So I'm looking forward for the new 2005..

MetaMan 03-12-2004 02:01 PM

that car is hot ass i like the new style of cars that many companies are coming out with, a kinda new techno look while mixed in with a retro look, the mustang and camaro both look DAMNMMNMN HOT.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123