No, but I have a problem with your double standards. I hardly doubt you would say 'that's ****** slang' to 'toodamnfli', yet you have no problem suggesting that a reasonably intelligent person is a hillbilly for using a certain word.

Kids under 13 communicating unsupervised on the internet is illegal as far as I know. 13 is a minor but face it they're old enough to see it. It's just easier than in the old days when you started trying to buy dirty magazines off kids at school at 10 years old.

" i know when youre home, i was thinking about you
there was something i forgot to say..."

:glugglug

I didn't call him a Hillbilly.

I said "Yall" isn't a word. It isn't.

I then said it's hillbilly slang. If you care to dispute this that is your prerogative. It certainly is a term that is used by hillbillies.

However, I am retracting nothing.

Email it to me.

Actually, it is! It is a contraction for you all.:)

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=y%27all

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Sure. But it is still regional slang.

Dictionary.com is an American site and contains American slang.

double :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

This thread is just starting and it's already getting funny ;P

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh the poor guy is getting bashed all the way

Ok, but it doesn't make all us Southerners "hillbillies". To me, y'all makes more sense than Yankees calling everyone "you guys".:winkwink:

Look there is some GOOD things and BAD things on the internet . For kids there are plenty of sites with nice games ... tv channels sites etc . They can learn a lot too with some CD roms etc.

But there is the spam and porn . If you install a good anti-spam like norton's one and a net nanny or something like that it's kinda safe.

Yea but will you do that when she will be 15-16 ... cauz if I was at that age I'd be fucking MAD ... my parents spying on me ? hell nah :)

I have an opt-in list of 7 year olds that have purchased porn before. Hit me up and i'll send you a test list.

But seriously, If your 7 year old wants to send granny pics of her playing the sandpit why dont you just send them for her?

Most kids like to do things by themselves ... Maybe not yet at 7 years old but at 9-10 certenly ... And they will learn sooner or later at school how it works anyways . My little brother had internet access at his primary school ... and they had emails and everything.

Sent to you man.

I have 2 boys ages 9 and 7 and they have their own computer and e-mail account. I would also be pissed if they got porn spam:321GFY I have their ratings low but a person can't really control e-mail.:BangBang:

Exactly. He is stereotyping all those who use the word (particularly Southerners). He has most likely been watching too much Jerry Springer.

It's ok VideoVoyeur I'll give you a job as a spam reporter, .50 cents a email. Tell me when you're ready to apply.

Y'all a bunch of goddang hillbillies.

That should be:

"Y'all ARE a bunch of goddang hillbillies."

:1orglaugh :winkwink:

Pardon me. :winkwink:

maybe a seven year old doesn't need an email account. who could she possibly need to correspond with besides relatives?

Sorry, but if you're a parent and your kid is under 12 and is on the internet WITHOUT absolutely DIRECT supervision of activies- you're not doing a very good job.

The net is not like TV. Some shitty parents of my friends used to dump them in front of a TV to get them to fuck off.
The net is different.

My opinion is that if you have a child unsupervised on the internet- you are a fucking TERRIBLE parent. I don't care if you set out "bookmark" rules. Chances are they will get curious and start fucking around.

Tell a kid not to do something what do you think they're going to do?

I respect your opinion. However I think you should consider mine.

sorry, but i don't want gangbang porn sent to my kids email account (even though fully supervised). I also think it should be illegal for people to send it to minors, regardless of the fact that there may be a parent sitting there filtering it all out manually.

I respect you opinion, and agree to a point. The net is different, it's more like the real world than TV. But, in the real world, if a pervert comes up and flashes his wares to my kids, while i'm escorting them down the street, i could have him arrested.

If at any point I said it was okay to spam that shit... let me know

I havn't seen anyone in this thread say it's ok to spam kids with porn and I was not in any way meaning to insinuate that you did.

exactly correct.


porn has no business in UCE, none.

and within the next 12 months a few webmasters will go down not necessarily because of UCE, but because it makes people on a jury so angry they will say something is obscene mostly because they are so fed up with this shit.

here's a clue.

don't foist your shit on someone, anyone, that does not want it.

fucked up your kid got it - spam sucks

Lensman,

this guy is a pathological liar.. He even said he made the 2 millionth post on gfy..

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...postid=3424027

Just because you or I wouldn't necessarily let as child of that age on the net or have an email account, doesn't mean those that do are bad parents. You must've missed that she monitors and filters. So, do you think it is ok to spam every email account out there and blame the parents? Nice. Gives this industry such a pristine glow!

BTW...using the word "yall" is not necessarily a reflection of someone's intelligence. It may not be the best english in the world and not a word I would use in conversation outside friends and family, but certainly no worse than "shizzle".

try the support forum

You're naive if you think only kids under 12 will do this. All kids will attempt in some way to work outside the rules. Yes supervision is key, but it is virutally impossible to supervise EVERYTHING your child does at all times. That is why you depend on montioring and filtering software.

Exactly what slack said, but before I had him arrested, I would beat the living shit out of him. :thumbsup

Problem is a lot of young jocks on here have no idea what is like to have children, most are still children themselves. Especially the ones making the remarks like I thought she would like it, etc.

Hell I cannot let my daughter stand beside me while I check my email even though she is so interested in what her dad does. Why? because you jackasses out there that will send the hardcore spam to any email address you can get a hold of. :feels-hot

you know sadly enough I thought that I was protecting my children. They are not allowed to access the internet at home unless myself or my husband is sitting right beside them. My 11 year old does have an email account but I filter it first and automatically delete any email that is not from her contact list. However, with that said, I recently found out that she has been able to access her email account from her school. I assumed that any internet access at school was monitored as it's a small school and they do have the faculty to do so. I guess I was wrong so now it's time for mama to show the school how pissed she is.

On a side note though, being in the business that we are we do know what transpires online by spammers and chat room predators. Why in the world would you allow your child free reign to the internet when you are aware of the things that can happen. My children are allowed nowhere near a chat room. If they are ever caught using one even if it is supposed to be a kids related chat room they will be permanently grounded from the internet. No ifs ands or buts about it!

Yep

Hey shithead, if you dont know dont say


Return-path: <[email protected]>
Received: from ms-mta-01-eri0 (ms-mta-01-qfe1 [10.10.5.70])
by ms-mss-03.southeast.rr.com
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))
with ESMTP id <[email protected]> for
@carolina.rr.com; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:22:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ncmx02.mgw.rr.com (ncmx02.mgw.rr.com [24.25.4.96])
by ms-mta-01.southeast.rr.com
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))
with ESMTP id <[email protected]> for
@carolina.rr.com (ORCPT @carolina.rr.com); Mon,
01 Mar 2004 15:22:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.adult.com (mail.adult.com [66.60.188.44])
by ncmx02.mgw.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i21KMPRW002264 for
<@carolina.rr.com>; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:22:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ics60569a8465d [66.60.188.9] by mail.adult.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.13) id AC3079F00B6; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:25:20 -0800
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:24:15 -0800
From: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Spam my daughter recieved
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
To: '<@carolina.rr.com>
Message-id: <20040301122514.SM01000@ics60569a8465d>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_9254_01C3FF88.1CE76DF0"
Thread-index: AcP/SnhzcaiKl2uVR6qS69ZWW13yTgAgJ/Hg
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Original-recipient: rfc822;@carolina.rr.com


Thanks we're going to block him.

Lens







Verify with lens if you want too