changes at ARS - GoFuckYourself.com

mrthumbs · 02-24-2004, 04:21 AM

good or bad?

Trax · 02-24-2004, 04:23 AM

its both, mr thumbs

beemk · 02-24-2004, 04:23 AM

mrthumbs · 02-24-2004, 04:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Trax
its both, mr thumbs

theres no such thing as both in this world

polish_aristocrat · 02-24-2004, 04:35 AM

Changes are perhaps good in the long run, but I think ARS will lose some webmasters now, because:
1. many big niches like asian, ebony etc are not covered ( not yet? )
2. the default payout was reduced to $25 per su and the new sites may better retain members, but not necessarly convert better ( assuming scrubbing stays the same, althoguth...if the members area is better = less charge backs = hopefully less scrubbing )
Sure, there are other programs paying only $25 per su, like Gamma Cash or Epic Cash, but on the other hand there are still programs paying $40 per su.

Basic_man · 02-24-2004, 04:49 AM

interesting reflexion...

Sylver7 · 02-24-2004, 04:51 AM

The 25.00 payout with the way their transactions are scrubbed to death is a joke.

Peaches · 02-24-2004, 07:39 AM

Having current links that go to a "catch all" site which may or may not cover the site you're promoting is obviously not a good thing for webmasters.

But in the long run, I think (hope) it's a strategy that insures they are here for the duration.

johnbosh · 02-24-2004, 07:41 AM

strobi · 02-24-2004, 07:45 AM

I dont know, mrthumbs, time will tell. For me it's bad because they are going to remove the "direct linking to join page".

Steve · 02-24-2004, 07:49 AM

good start
next thing they should work on is the member's areas

Anna_O · 02-24-2004, 07:50 AM

Mr Thumbs, right now it feels like the changes are more bad than good... It will be interesting to see exactly what the champ system has to offer, but my feelings for it is not that good. So Mr Thumbs, I voted "bad".

mrthumbs · 02-24-2004, 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Anna_O
Mr Thumbs, right now it feels like the changes are more bad than good... It will be interesting to see exactly what the champ system has to offer, but my feelings for it is not that good. So Mr Thumbs, I voted "bad".

thanks

Anna_O · 02-24-2004, 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by mrthumbs

thanks

You're welcome

View Poll Results: changes at ARS: good or bad
good, mrthumbs	5	15.15%
bad, mrthumbs	25	75.76%
i dont know, mrthumbs	3	9.09%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

02-24-2004, 04:21 AM	#1
mrthumbs salad tossing sig guy Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: mrthumbs*gmail.com Posts: 11,702	changes at ARS good or bad?

02-24-2004, 04:23 AM	#3
beemk CLICK HERE Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 20,829	bad __________________ I host with Vacares

02-24-2004, 04:35 AM	#5
polish_aristocrat Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 40,377	Changes are perhaps good in the long run, but I think ARS will lose some webmasters now, because: 1. many big niches like asian, ebony etc are not covered ( not yet? ) 2. the default payout was reduced to $25 per su and the new sites may better retain members, but not necessarly convert better ( assuming scrubbing stays the same, althoguth...if the members area is better = less charge backs = hopefully less scrubbing ) Sure, there are other programs paying only $25 per su, like Gamma Cash or Epic Cash, but on the other hand there are still programs paying $40 per su. __________________ I don't use ICQ anymore.

02-24-2004, 04:49 AM	#6
Basic_man Programming King Pin Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Montreal Posts: 27,360	interesting reflexion... __________________ UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress! Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !

02-24-2004, 04:23 AM	#2
Trax [----------------------] Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 14,486	its both, mr thumbs

02-24-2004, 04:51 AM	#7
Sylver7 Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: [206] Posts: 489	The 25.00 payout with the way their transactions are scrubbed to death is a joke.

02-24-2004, 07:39 AM	#8
Peaches Old broad Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Away Posts: 13,933	Having current links that go to a "catch all" site which may or may not cover the site you're promoting is obviously not a good thing for webmasters. But in the long run, I think (hope) it's a strategy that insures they are here for the duration.

02-24-2004, 07:41 AM	#9
johnbosh Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: The Netherlands, Rotterdam Posts: 8,965	bab

02-24-2004, 07:45 AM	#10
strobi Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Belgium Posts: 7,383	I dont know, mrthumbs, time will tell. For me it's bad because they are going to remove the "direct linking to join page".

02-24-2004, 07:49 AM	#11
Steve Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: USA Posts: 6,894	good start next thing they should work on is the member's areas

02-24-2004, 07:50 AM	#12
Anna_O Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Sweden Posts: 5,773	Mr Thumbs, right now it feels like the changes are more bad than good... It will be interesting to see exactly what the champ system has to offer, but my feelings for it is not that good. So Mr Thumbs, I voted "bad". __________________ Fetish by Anna Paysite - Nylons Bondage Latex Lesbians Glamour Annas Dungeon - 70k / day Fetish TGP ICQ 246797915