I hope Kerry crashes and burns! - GoFuckYourself.com

Digipimp · 02-12-2004, 11:29 PM

Is anyone with me? I can't stand King George but I think John Kerry is fucking horrible too.

p3rsian · 02-12-2004, 11:30 PM

fuckem all

baddog · 02-12-2004, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Digipimp
Is anyone with me? I can't stand King George but I think John Kerry is fucking horrible too.

so, who do you want to win?

Digipimp · 02-12-2004, 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog

so, who do you want to win?

I don't like any of them but I would feel safer with Edwards possibly over Kerry. I don't want someone to make me an outlaw for being involved in porn and I don't want someone who will sell our country out to the control of the UN either. I also figure he has the best choice at beating King George since he would be the most centered. But honestly I don't like any of them.

JDog · 02-12-2004, 11:33 PM

I just hope Bush gets out!

jDOG

baddog · 02-12-2004, 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Digipimp

I don't like any of them but I would feel safer with Edwards possibly over Kerry. I don't want someone to make me an outlaw for being involved in porn and I don't want someone who will sell our country out to the control of the UN either. I also figure he has the best choice at beating King George since he would be the most centered. But honestly I don't like any of them.

unfortunately, Edwards stands about as much a chance of winning the nomination as Dean

Digipimp · 02-12-2004, 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog

unfortunately, Edwards stands about as much a chance of winning the nomination as Dean

Are you kidding me or have you not been paying attention at all? Edwards by far has the best chance of capturing the votes compared to the rest of the democrats. The guy is slightly conservative, southern, democrat, young, pro military and speaks very well. The northern super liberal democrats will vote for whoever gets the nomination regardless, however the southern swing votes and in between votes will not vote for Kerry or Dean, that's what needs captured and Edwards is the only one that can do that.

Again I don't like any of them but that's the truth.

broke · 02-12-2004, 11:44 PM

Edwards is a better candidate than Kerry.

phelix · 02-13-2004, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by broke
Edwards is a better candidate than Kerry.

Amen to that. And it's not over yet. What happened to Dean shows that things can change VERY fast. Just look at how Kerry is being attacked from all sides at the moment.

I've heard many good things from insiders about Edwards and we need that type of relentless positivity in this country for a change. We need a uniter, not a divider. And we need a GLOBAL leader not a unilateralist.

Hey Wisconsin, vote Edwards!!!

Kingfish · 02-13-2004, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Digipimp

Are you kidding me or have you not been paying attention at all? Edwards by far has the best chance of capturing the votes compared to the rest of the democrats. The guy is slightly conservative, southern, democrat, young, pro military and speaks very well. The northern super liberal democrats will vote for whoever gets the nomination regardless, however the southern swing votes and in between votes will not vote for Kerry or Dean, that's what needs captured and Edwards is the only one that can do that.

Again I don't like any of them but that's the truth.

If you had been paying attention to the news, you would see a lot of your assumption are wrong. In a nationwide poll of likely voters John Kerry beats George Bush by 9pts and John Edwards beats Bush by 1pt. Also polls and exit polling are showing that Kerry has avoided the tag of northern liberal because of his military service. People see him as a real war hero especially when you stand him up next to Bush. Furthermore Kerry is doing better than any Democrat with the male NASCAR voter because of his military service. That particular group of voters is the most important to Democrats.

rooster · 02-13-2004, 10:30 AM

most people really dont know much about kerry, hes just the flavor of the day after dean imploded.

As time goes on, more of his scandals are going to come out, that although he served in the military he then went out of his way to bad mouth the country afterward, and he is of jewish desent.

Danny_C · 02-13-2004, 10:32 AM

I don't see that Kerry would be much of an improvement.

CraigA · 02-13-2004, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by phelix

Amen to that. And it's not over yet. What happened to Dean shows that things can change VERY fast. Just look at how Kerry is being attacked from all sides at the moment.

I've heard many good things from insiders about Edwards and we need that type of relentless positivity in this country for a change. We need a uniter, not a divider. And we need a GLOBAL leader not a unilateralist.

Hey Wisconsin, vote Edwards!!!

John Edwards is BY FAR the most dynamic candidate the Democrats have. He's articulate, bright and energetic. He commands attention. He's proven he can win a big political race as he drove the Jesse Helms right wing machine out of North Carolina when he won the US Senate seat there. He reminds me, in some ways, of Bill Clinton in 1992.
Kerry has the momenteum but you never know.

phogirl69 · 02-13-2004, 10:39 AM

I'm not really into politics so I don't really know what kind of ideals all the candidates stands for. Out off all the people possible for nomination, which one is the one most likely to be not so anti-porn like Clinton and best for the industry? Which is not so conservative and not likely to prosecute obscenity? And which one believes the most between separation of church and state?

Kingfish · 02-13-2004, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Danny_C
I don't see that Kerry would be much of an improvement.

So you want 4 more years of John Ashhahahahaha as Attorney General?

Nas7782 · 02-13-2004, 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by phogirl69
I'm not really into politics so I don't really know what kind of ideals all the candidates stands for. Out off all the people possible for nomination, which one is the one most likely to be not so anti-porn like Clinton and best for the industry? Which is not so conservative and not likely to prosecute obscenity? And which one believes the most between separation of church and state?

Dean is your man on those issues. He's very anti-federalist, which means, give more sovereignty to the state. All the Dems are strong believers of sep. of church and state.

Most least likely to prosecute porn is probably Dean. Kerry is kinda like Gore in that if lobbyist push him hard enough to prosecute porn, he'll do it. I believe Edward is the same way, afterall, both Edward and Kerry have huge special interest money by their side. Edward, and his trial lawyers interest group, Kerry and his many corporate money backers.

BobChezule · 02-13-2004, 12:32 PM

When it comes to a presidential race it's not really about the candidates. It's about which campaign can better smear the other candidate and which candidate the media chooses to prey on. In the 2000 election the media chose to prey on Al Gore and he was portrayed as a lying dope, and he lost the election (sort of). If John Kerry's team can smear Bush well enough and he doesn't have any big skeletons in the closet he may very well win.

Also, porn will thrive more under a democrat.

broke · 02-13-2004, 12:41 PM

Kerry will get CRUSHED in a smear campaign.

I hate liberals and most democrats in general and let me tell you again...

Edwards is your best man.

Hell -- he has me considering my vote.

SoBeGirl Video · 02-13-2004, 12:44 PM

Not now, not a democrat....

02-12-2004, 11:29 PM	#1
Digipimp BP4L OT DL Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: BP4L Swap Meet Posts: 13,481	I hope Kerry crashes and burns! Is anyone with me? I can't stand King George but I think John Kerry is fucking horrible too. __________________ Still Hosting at Webair and You Should Be Too

02-12-2004, 11:30 PM	#2
p3rsian Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,050	fuckem all __________________ boro en harfa chei

02-12-2004, 11:33 PM	#5
JDog Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Canby, OR Posts: 7,453	I just hope Bush gets out! jDOG __________________ NSCash now powering ReelProfits.com ALSO FEATURING: NSCash.com :: SoloDollars.com :: ReelProfits.com :: BiminiBucks.com :: VOD PROGRAMS COMING SOON: Greedy Bucks :: Vengeance Cash NOW OFFERING OVER 60 SITES CONTACT :: JAMES SMITH :: CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER :: ICQ (711385133)

02-12-2004, 11:44 PM	#8
broke Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Someplace Windy Posts: 4,501	Edwards is a better candidate than Kerry. __________________ Perfect Gonzo

02-13-2004, 10:30 AM	#11
rooster Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 2,384	most people really dont know much about kerry, hes just the flavor of the day after dean imploded. As time goes on, more of his scandals are going to come out, that although he served in the military he then went out of his way to bad mouth the country afterward, and he is of jewish desent. __________________ Ever notice that pretty much everything added to the Constitution after the original was a mistake.

02-13-2004, 10:32 AM	#12
Danny_C Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Philadelphia, PA Posts: 2,160	I don't see that Kerry would be much of an improvement.

02-13-2004, 10:39 AM	#14
phogirl69 Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,330	I'm not really into politics so I don't really know what kind of ideals all the candidates stands for. Out off all the people possible for nomination, which one is the one most likely to be not so anti-porn like Clinton and best for the industry? Which is not so conservative and not likely to prosecute obscenity? And which one believes the most between separation of church and state?

02-13-2004, 12:32 PM	#17
BobChezule Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: New York Posts: 779	When it comes to a presidential race it's not really about the candidates. It's about which campaign can better smear the other candidate and which candidate the media chooses to prey on. In the 2000 election the media chose to prey on Al Gore and he was portrayed as a lying dope, and he lost the election (sort of). If John Kerry's team can smear Bush well enough and he doesn't have any big skeletons in the closet he may very well win. Also, porn will thrive more under a democrat.

02-13-2004, 12:41 PM	#18
broke Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Someplace Windy Posts: 4,501	Kerry will get CRUSHED in a smear campaign. I hate liberals and most democrats in general and let me tell you again... Edwards is your best man. Hell -- he has me considering my vote. __________________ Perfect Gonzo

02-13-2004, 12:44 PM	#19
SoBeGirl Video So Fucking Banned Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Planet earth Posts: 2,493	Not now, not a democrat....