jpg banners definitely obsolete vs flash ones ? - GoFuckYourself.com

Overseas · 02-03-2004, 07:53 AM

Do you think, since jpg static display could look obsolete, banners must be now only designed under flash ?

uptheyingyang · 02-03-2004, 08:16 AM

flash banners are good for people that have flash on their machine.

problem is, many do not.

animated gif gives best universality, although not as dynamic as flash.

surprising, but sometimes a simple text link will have just as good C-T-R.

depends on what you're trying to say, how long the banner will be seen on the page (ie. sometimes a flash banner at bottom of long text page will have better C-T-R than one at top of short page, because it will have more time to load, etc.)

lots of variables here.

scooby doo as scooby does · 02-03-2004, 08:17 AM

Well, I'm reading this using mozilla firebird with flash turned off. So JPG 1, Flash 0 so far

bluff · 02-03-2004, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by uptheyingyang
flash banners are good for people that have flash on their machine.

problem is, many do not.

animated gif gives best universality, although not as dynamic as flash.

surprising, but sometimes a simple text link will have just as good C-T-R.

depends on what you're trying to say, how long the banner will be seen on the page (ie. sometimes a flash banner at bottom of long text page will have better C-T-R than one at top of short page, because it will have more time to load, etc.)

lots of variables here.

In my experience, text links always get a better CTR than banners do

uptheyingyang · 02-03-2004, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by scooby doo as scooby does
Well, I'm reading this using mozilla firebird with flash turned off. So JPG 1, Flash 0 so far

my point exactly.

hentaibee · 02-03-2004, 08:19 AM

text and a gif, or a jpg / gif comboe table banner will work wonders...

02-03-2004, 07:53 AM	#1
Overseas Registered User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Paris - France Posts: 22	jpg banners definitely obsolete vs flash ones ? Do you think, since jpg static display could look obsolete, banners must be now only designed under flash ? __________________ Enfin des histoires érotiques illustrees et coquines, complètement inédites, sur www.histoirescoquines.com !

02-03-2004, 08:16 AM	#2
uptheyingyang Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: chicago Posts: 376	flash banners are good for people that have flash on their machine. problem is, many do not. animated gif gives best universality, although not as dynamic as flash. surprising, but sometimes a simple text link will have just as good C-T-R. depends on what you're trying to say, how long the banner will be seen on the page (ie. sometimes a flash banner at bottom of long text page will have better C-T-R than one at top of short page, because it will have more time to load, etc.) lots of variables here. __________________ promote our original content 30 niche site package with ccbill: www.gashflash.com/affiliates/

02-03-2004, 08:17 AM	#3
scooby doo as scooby does Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: A deep dark place. Posts: 314	Well, I'm reading this using mozilla firebird with flash turned off. So JPG 1, Flash 0 so far __________________ In 1904, Charles Newman-Berry connected two abacus's together using specially enhanced GrapeVine thus inventing the first Internet connection. NEWMAN-BERRY CASH Paying webmaster since 1904

02-03-2004, 08:19 AM	#6
hentaibee Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: netherlands Posts: 724	text and a gif, or a jpg / gif comboe table banner will work wonders... __________________ icq: 45649137 http://www.bigtitsponsors.com- good big tit sponsors list http://www.huge-tits-boobs.com a huge boobs blog