GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Is there anyone who'd truly EVIL that posts regurally to GFY? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=229205)

CDSmith 02-01-2004 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by graphicsbytia
all I had to do was copy and paste his quotes.. I stand by what I said.. people who minimize the act of promoting child abuse is IMO just as bad as those who do the actual act
You are bounding into the realm of being a candidate for the idiot list now. If you have proof that the guy is out and out promoting child abuse then let's see it. Otherwise fuck off.

graphicsbytia 02-01-2004 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
You are bounding into the realm of being a candidate for the idiot list now. If you have proof that the guy is out and out promoting child abuse then let's see it. Otherwise fuck off.

I am commenting soley on what you said CDSmith, I didn't see this guy's website, I don't know what is on it.. all I saw was somone (you) trying to minimize the promotion of child porn.. perhaps you didn't mean to do it.. but you did it.. and telling me to fuck off doesn't change what you said

Libertine 02-01-2004 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
That's the thing.... I don't claim to know first-hand of all what is/was on sexped's site, but what I did see was mostly utter nonsense, and to use your words.... some of it was definitely creepy (in a moronic kind of way). But I've never seen, or hear of anyone saying, that there was actual cp on the site, pics of kids in sexual situations etc. If there was such evidence I would be wondering why he isn't locked up by now.
There was some of that stuff on his site, but it was censored (faces and genitals were censored) and had text along with it saying that stuff like that had to be stopped and such. Intensely stupid, naive, borderline retarded, crazy, creepy and fucked up - yes.
Far from participating in the distribution of child porn though.

Libertine 02-01-2004 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by graphicsbytia



I am commenting soley on what you said CDSmith, I didn't see this guy's website, I don't know what is on it.. all I saw was somone (you) trying to minimize the promotion of child porn.. perhaps you didn't mean to do it.. but you did it.. and telling me to fuck off doesn't change what you said

If the debate is about whether it's the promotion of child porn or not, saying it's not the promotion of child porn is NOT trying to minimize the moral implications of the promotion of child porn.

CDSmith 02-01-2004 01:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by graphicsbytia
I am commenting soley on what you said CDSmith, I didn't see this guy's website, I don't know what is on it.. all I saw was somone (you) trying to minimize the promotion of child porn.. perhaps you didn't mean to do it.. but you did it.. and telling me to fuck off doesn't change what you said
There you go. You are arguing a point that you don't even have first-hand knowledge of. The few jpg's I referred to were the ones punkworld is talking about. Get a clue, you obviously need one.

Libertine 02-01-2004 01:58 AM

But I'm off to watch Bridget Jones' Diary and drink herbal tea :glugglug

Night everyone.

graphicsbytia 02-01-2004 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld


If the debate is about whether it's the promotion of child porn or not, saying it's not the promotion of child porn is NOT trying to minimize the moral implications of the promotion of child porn.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sexpedo may be catering to the underage on his websites, but does that qualify as evil per se?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

sounds like a whole lot of minimizing to me

 Smokey The Bear  02-01-2004 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
That's the thing.... I don't claim to know first-hand of all what is/was on sexped's site, but what I did see was mostly utter nonsense, and to use your words.... some of it was definitely creepy (in a moronic kind of way). But I've never seen, or hear of anyone saying, that there was actual cp on the site, pics of kids in sexual situations etc. If there was such evidence I would be wondering why he isn't locked up by now.
Here is a screenshot of actual cp on his server

http://web.archive.org/web/200211301.../tiscali_2.jpg

Evil1 02-01-2004 02:02 AM

:eek7

CDSmith 02-01-2004 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
If the debate is about whether it's the promotion of child porn or not, saying it's not the promotion of child porn is NOT trying to minimize the moral implications of the promotion of child porn.
She is a ball buster, the worst evil on this planet.


Where is the pic of that woman's foot in the spike heel stomping a guy's nuts at?

Libertine 02-01-2004 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by *Smokey The Bear*


Here is a screenshot of actual cp on his server

http://web.archive.org/web/200211301.../tiscali_2.jpg

And here is the page containing it:
http://web.archive.org/web/200212050..._children.html

Quoting:
Quote:

"Lolita" is sexual internet/slang term for underage girls which have sex. The website in question advertises itself as an "underground lolita" website. Pedophiles search for the term "lolita" when looking for websites which cater to their sexual perversion and therefore this website is sexually abusing children and marketing itself to those with child sexual perversions.

Please take the time, regardless of where you live in the world to visit Tiscali.net and let them know hosting child pornography will NOT make them money - and will NOT be tolerated. When you email them - if you wish - send me a copy of the email to [email protected].

Libertine 02-01-2004 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by graphicsbytia


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sexpedo may be catering to the underage on his websites, but does that qualify as evil per se?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

sounds like a whole lot of minimizing to me

Catering *to* the underage, not catering underage. As in, having info for kids on his site, not promoting cp on his site. Do you even get the point at all? :eek7

Ah well, fuck it. My herbal tea (mango/peach - yummy) is ready, so now I'm really outta here.

graphicsbytia 02-01-2004 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
There you go. You are arguing a point that you don't even have first-hand knowledge of. The few jpg's I referred to were the ones punkworld is talking about. Get a clue, you obviously need one.
Quote:

If someone showed me proof that he actually harmed kids I would tend to agree with you, but putting shit up on a website? Criminal, perhaps. Evil?...
I have firsthand knowledge of your posts on this subject which is all I'm commenting on

CDSmith 02-01-2004 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by graphicsbytia
sounds like a whole lot of minimizing to me
Fine, woman. based on your zero knowledge of what is being discussed, you are right. I am wrong. He is evil. I said he was sick, that wasn't good enough. I said he was a moron, still not good enough. I said that if there is actual proof of him phyically harming or physically abusing anyone (which is what you said as well) then I would call him evil.... and THAT wasn't good enough for you.

Woman, you like to argue. You will obviously argue about two flies crawling up a wall, and hammer home your opinion until everyone around you is sick of you enough to concede your minute point. Just tell me you are happy now. Please. I'll do anything. I will go out of my way to warn other GFY members not to disagree with you or risk 19 paged threads of you splitting hairs and frying the quote button.

Kill me, kill me now.

AbulletAway 02-01-2004 02:13 AM

Sexed/cockblogger, whatever the fuck he is today. He's evil. I don't care if he grew up in Greece. What he does is wrong. And not only do I think he is evil I think he's shallow and stupid. I don't really wish any harm on anyone but if he got hit by a bus and died choking on his own pedo blood, I'd giggle. God only knows what crimes he's committed against children. If he's posting that shit and has no problem with it what else does he does he do that he thinks is acceptable.

nofx 02-01-2004 02:15 AM

http://getridofbills.com/images/head1.jpg

he loves it too

graphicsbytia 02-01-2004 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
She is a ball buster, the worst evil on this planet.


Where is the pic of that woman's foot in the spike heel stomping a guy's nuts at?

lol

you'll have to forgive me CDSmith.. I get a little testy (no pun intended) when it comes to child porn being talked about like it deserves a slap on the wrist.. maybe I was wrong about how I read your posts.. hope so.. you seem like a nice guy

Libertine 02-01-2004 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AbulletAwayGoneBad
If he's posting that shit and has no problem with it what else does he does he do that he thinks is acceptable.
:eek7

He posted it *because* he had a problem with it... he called upon the visitors of his website to start emailing tiscali to put a stop to them hosting the shit. He was actually *taking action* against it... stupidly, yes, but still...

But now my herbal tea is getting cold, so I'm REALLY out of here. Gfy is pure evil.

graphicsbytia 02-01-2004 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
Fine, woman. based on your zero knowledge of what is being discussed, you are right. I am wrong. He is evil. I said he was sick, that wasn't good enough. I said he was a moron, still not good enough. I said that if there is actual proof of him phyically harming or physically abusing anyone (which is what you said as well) then I would call him evil.... and THAT wasn't good enough for you.

Woman, you like to argue. You will obviously argue about two flies crawling up a wall, and hammer home your opinion until everyone around you is sick of you enough to concede your minute point. Just tell me you are happy now. Please. I'll do anything. I will go out of my way to warn other GFY members not to disagree with you or risk 19 paged threads of you splitting hairs and frying the quote button.

Kill me, kill me now.

lol.. ok I concede

CDSmith 02-01-2004 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by graphicsbytia
lol.. ok I concede
Too late. You've flattened my balls and killed me.

I am dead. Goodnight.

graphicsbytia 02-01-2004 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
Too late. You've flattened my balls and killed me.

I am dead. Goodnight.

what a shame, I hate it when I flatten a guy's balls

nuclei 02-01-2004 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
He posted it *because* he had a problem with it...
There are a number of threads here that say differantly. Threads in which he was proven to be what people are saying he is, and in which he had no rebuttal.

You think 50 people hijack every thread he starts because they are just bored?

I think maybe you should go back a year or 2 and do some reading on the guy before defending him here.

AbulletAway 02-01-2004 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld


:eek7

He posted it *because* he had a problem with it... he called upon the visitors of his website to start emailing tiscali to put a stop to them hosting the shit. He was actually *taking action* against it... stupidly, yes, but still...

But now my herbal tea is getting cold, so I'm REALLY out of here. Gfy is pure evil.



No, he posts because he's an idiot. I have seen him get banned on other boards. I have seen his site when it had CP on it. I have listened to him try to defend the right post CP. This guy is disturbed and just plain sick. He gets slammed for a reason. He doesn't come and post here for help. It's advertising plain and simple. People are going to look at his site. Not everyone that surfs this board is a decent person. This board is beyond huge. He shows up and asks for help. People go to his site and some sick bastards out there might like it. Why else would anyone post and continue to post on a board where they are spanked so hard. Simple. Anyone who is in to CP is gonna find a link to his threads and then visit his site. I'm sorry but he's a pedo, he hasn't changed and he uses the board. I can't imagine why anyone would seriously defend this guy.

bluff 02-01-2004 03:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
Do you think there is anyone who's truly evil that posts regurally to GFY?

if so who is it?

LOL regurally

shermo 02-01-2004 04:14 AM

Definitly Turd. :ak47:

Libertine 02-01-2004 04:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by nuclei


There are a number of threads here that say differantly. Threads in which he was proven to be what people are saying he is, and in which he had no rebuttal.

You think 50 people hijack every thread he starts because they are just bored?

I think maybe you should go back a year or 2 and do some reading on the guy before defending him here.

I read the stuff from the beginning. The guy's a complete nutjob, no doubt about that. He's an attention whore, too, and seems to get off on getting slammed on message boards in much the same way as someone like Lawrence Connor.

He's said dumb things, too. Many of them. Countless, actually. If you accuse him of sticking small furry animals up his ass, he'll reply by saying that vaginal orgasm is a lie and that the mainstream media are trying to prevent him from spreading that message. He'll actually believe that, too. So obviously there are many threads in which he had no rebuttal for things being said about him... he's a mildly retarded nutcase.

It has, however, in no way been "proven" that he's a pedo. In fact, he took action against child porn... something that wasn't pointed out by him but discovered by the GFY community, which then by some odd reasoning turned into it an idea of him being a child pornographer.

Of the 50 people hijacking every thread he starts, 49 are just bandwagon jumpers who go into a frenzy when someone even mentions the words "child porn". Not that there's anything wrong with that - it just tends to lead to public lynchings of relatively innocent people.

Libertine 02-01-2004 04:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AbulletAwayGoneBad




No, he posts because he's an idiot. I have seen him get banned on other boards. I have seen his site when it had CP on it. I have listened to him try to defend the right post CP. This guy is disturbed and just plain sick. He gets slammed for a reason. He doesn't come and post here for help. It's advertising plain and simple. People are going to look at his site. Not everyone that surfs this board is a decent person. This board is beyond huge. He shows up and asks for help. People go to his site and some sick bastards out there might like it. Why else would anyone post and continue to post on a board where they are spanked so hard. Simple. Anyone who is in to CP is gonna find a link to his threads and then visit his site. I'm sorry but he's a pedo, he hasn't changed and he uses the board. I can't imagine why anyone would seriously defend this guy.

So you believe it's all an elaborate scheme to get a few pedos a few cp images? Are you fucking joking me?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123